Acute Abortive Therapies for Seizure Clusters in Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVES: To describe acute seizure treatment for the long-term care setting, emphasizing rescue (acute abortive) medications for on-site management of acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters. DESIGN: Narrative review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: People with seizures in long-term care, including group residences. METHODS: PubMed was searched using keywords that pertained to rescue medications, seizure emergencies/epilepsy, seizure action plans, and long-term care. RESULTS: Seizure disorder, including epilepsy, is prevalent in long-term care residences, and rescue medications can be used for on-site treatment. Diazepam rectal gel, intranasal midazolam, and diazepam nasal spray are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved seizure-cluster rescue medications, and intravenous diazepam and lorazepam are approved for status epilepticus. Benzodiazepines differ by formulation, route of administration, absorption, and metabolism. Intranasal formulations are easy and ideal for public use and when rectal treatment is challenging (eg, wheelchair). Intranasal, intrabuccal, and rectal formulations do not require specialized training to administer and are easier for staff at all levels of training compared with intravenous treatment. Off-label rescue medications may have anecdotal support; however, potential disadvantages include variable absorption and onset of action as well as potential risks to patients and caregivers or care partners. Delivery of intravenous-administered rescue medications is delayed by the time needed to set up and deliver the medication and is subject to dosing errors. Seizure action plans that include management of acute seizures can optimize the quality and timing of treatment, which may reduce emergency service needs and prevent progression to status epilepticus. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Seizure disorder is prevalent across all ages but is increased in older adults and in those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Prompt intervention may reduce negative outcomes associated with acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters. Seizure action plans that include acute seizures can improve the treatment response by detailing the necessary information for staff to provide immediate treatment.

Intravenous ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus: Results from an open-label, dose-finding, phase 2 trial.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) have failed treatment with benzodiazepines and ≥1 second-line intravenous (IV) antiseizure medication (ASM). Guidelines recommend IV anesthesia when second-line ASMs have failed, but potential harms can outweigh the benefits. Novel treatments are needed to stop and durably control RSE without escalation to IV anesthetics. Ganaxolone is an investigational neuroactive steroid in development for RSE treatment. This study's objective was to determine the appropriate dosing for IV ganaxolone in RSE and obtain a preliminary assessment of efficacy and safety. METHODS: This was an open-label, phase 2 trial conducted from February 19, 2018 to September 18, 2019, at three sites in the United States. Patients were aged ≥12 years, had convulsive or nonconvulsive SE, and failed to respond to ≥1 second-line IV ASM. Twenty-one patients were screened; 17 were enrolled. Patients received IV ganaxolone added to standard-of-care ASMs. Ganaxolone infusion was initiated as an IV bolus (over 3 min) with continuous infusion of decreasing infusion rates for 48-96 h followed by an 18-h taper. There were three ganaxolone dosing cohorts: low, 500 mg/day; medium, 650 mg/day; and high, 713 mg/day. The primary end point was the number of patients not requiring escalation to IV anesthetic treatment within 24 h of ganaxolone initiation. RESULTS: Most of the 17 enrolled patients (65%) had nonconvulsive SE, and had failed a median of three prior ASMs, including first-line benzodiazepine and second-line IV ASM therapy. Median time to SE cessation following ganaxolone initiation was 5 min. No patient required escalation to third-line IV anesthetics during the 24-h period following ganaxolone initiation. Two treatment-related serious adverse events (sedation) were reported. Of the three deaths, none was considered related to ganaxolone; all occurred 9-22 days after completing ganaxolone. SIGNIFICANCE: IV ganaxolone achieved rapid and durable seizure control in patients with RSE, and showed acceptable safety and tolerability.

Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a once-daily oral anti-seizure drug (ASD), in older and younger adult patient populations. METHODS: Two post-hoc pooled data analyses were performed: one from three Phase III studies in patients with focal (partial-onset) seizures who were taking 1-3 concomitant ASDs; the other from five Phase II studies in patients from non-epilepsy populations not taking other ASDs chronically and/or at a clinically-effective anti-seizure dose. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were calculated for the older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults separately. RESULTS: In the focal seizures study pool, 4.1 % of patients (58/1431) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 77.5 % in older ESL-treated patients and 72.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.495). For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs was 50.0 % in the older adults and 57.5 % in the younger adults (p = 0.531). The overall placebo-adjusted frequency of TEAEs was 27.5 % in older adults and 15.1 % in younger adults. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs dizziness, somnolence, headache, nausea, diplopia, blurred vision, and ataxia were ≥5 % higher, and frequencies of vomiting and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older than younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 15.0 % in older ESL-treated patients and 17.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.647); the frequency increased with increasing ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 5.6 % in older adults and 6.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.847). In the non-epilepsy study pool, 30.2 % of patients (515/1705) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 56.9 % in older ESL-treated patients and 58.8 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies were 14.9 % in older and 15.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older adults, whereas somnolence was ≥2 % higher in younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 18.3 % in older ESL-treated patients and 12.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.003); frequencies were not related to ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 8.0 % in older adults and 5.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.407). CONCLUSION: Analyses of adverse event data support the safety and tolerability of ESL in adults aged ≥60 years. In the limited number of older patients with focal seizures taking ESL plus concomitant ASDs (n = 40), the frequency of TEAEs was generally higher than in younger adults. However, in the non-epilepsy patient group (in which the number of older patients was ten times larger; 427 patients taking ESL without concomitant ASDs), no marked age-related TEAE differences were observed, suggesting that increased ASD load associated with adjunctive therapy may complicate treatment selection in older patients, due to risk of increased adverse events. As is common practice for all ASDs, balancing clinical response and tolerability is needed in this vulnerable group of patients.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of weight-based IV loading dose of lacosamide in the ICU.

Among the newer antiseizure medications, lacosamide (LCM) has been increasingly used for acute seizures and status epilepticus in intensive care unit (ICU). We reviewed retrospectively weight-based dosing of IV LCM in patients admitted to ICU with acute seizures and status epilepticus. We have analyzed 354/382 patient treated with IV LCM in ICU during the years 2013-2016. Data collected were age, total body weight, body mass index (BMI), loading dose, post-IV infusion LCM blood level, duration of infusion, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressures, and documented initiation of pressor agents during or within in 30 min of infusion. Larger doses >8 mg/kg of IV LCM that can be safely administered in ICU patients produce effective plasma levels of 15-20 µg/ml with relatively constant volume of distribution.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetics following oral and stable-labeled intravenous administration in young and elderly adult epilepsy patients: Effect of age.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of age on pharmacokinetic parameters of lamotrigine (LTG) and estimate parameter variability. METHODS: Patients (>18 years old) who were already on a steady-state dose of LTG therapy with no interacting comedications were enrolled. Patients with significant cardiac disease, severe kidney dysfunction, or moderate-to-severe liver dysfunction were excluded. Fifty milligrams of a stable-labeled intravenous LTG formulation (SL-LTG) replaced 50 mg of a patient's normal daily oral LTG dose. Thirteen blood samples were collected in each person over 96 hours. SL-LTG and unlabeled LTG concentrations were measured simultaneously by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM version 7.3). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients representing 16 young (18-48 years old) and 12 elderly (63-87 years old) patients were included, yielding 382 unlabeled and 351 SL-LTG concentrations. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the plasma concentration-time data. Bioavailability of oral LTG was approximately 74% and did not differ by age. LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly than in young patients (1.80 L/h for a 70-kg patient). SIGNIFICANCE: Although LTG bioavailability was not affected by age, LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly versus young patients of comparable body weight, possibly indicating lower dosages being needed in this population.

Factors in Variability of Serial Gabapentin Concentrations in Elderly Patients with Epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize and quantify the variability of serial gabapentin concentrations in elderly patients with epilepsy. METHODS: This study included 83 patients (age ≥ 60 yrs) from an 18-center randomized double-blind double-dummy parallel study from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative 428 Study. All patients were taking 1500 mg/day gabapentin. Within-person coefficient of variation (CV) in gabapentin concentrations, measured weekly to bimonthly for up to 52 weeks, then quarterly, was computed. Impact of patient characteristics on gabapentin concentrations (linear mixed model) and CV (linear regression) were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 482 gabapentin concentration measurements were available for analysis. Gabapentin concentrations and intrapatient CVs ranged from 0.5 to 22.6 µg/ml (mean 7.9 µg/ml, standard deviation [SD] 4.1 µg/ml) and 2% to 79% (mean 27.9%, SD 15.3%), respectively, across all visits. Intrapatient CV was higher by 7.3% for those with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m2 (coefficient = 7.3, p=0.04). CVs were on average 0.5% higher for each 1-unit higher CV in creatinine clearance (coefficient = 0.5, p=0.03) and 1.2% higher for each 1-hour longer mean time after dose (coefficient = 1.2, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial intrapatient variability in serial gabapentin concentration was noted in elderly patients with epilepsy. Creatinine clearance, time of sampling relative to dose, and obesity were found to be positively associated with variability.

Safety & pK of IV loading dose of lacosamide in the ICU.

A restrospective review of patients treated in the ICU for refractory status epilepticus who had received an initial IV loading dose of lacosamide (LCS) was performed. A total of 142 patients were identified. The first 34 patients received 400mg which by weight-based measurement ranged from 2 to 11 mg/kg. Higher mg/kg dosing had been used subsequently with doses up to 13 mg/kg. No patient required reduction in rate or cessation of infusion. Initiation of pressor agents was not needed during the infusion of the loading dose. Postinfusion LCS blood levels were drawn, and dosing of 10-12 mg/kg and higher resulted in blood levels above 15 µg/ml while doses of 2-6 mg/kg resulted in levels below 10 µg/ml. We conclude that a weight-based loading dose of 10-12 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 0.4 mg/kg/min is safe and will produce levels of 15 µg/ml and higher. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of immediate-release and extended-release formulations of lamotrigine in elderly epilepsy patients: Use of stable isotope methodology.

A classic 2-period crossover bioavailability study was conducted to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavailability of immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (XR) lamotrigine formulations under steady-state conditions in elderly patients with epilepsy. On treatment days, each subject's morning dose (IR or XR lamotrigine) was replaced with an intravenous 50-mg dose of stable-labeled lamotrigine. Lamotrigine concentrations were measured at 13 points between 0 and 96 hours. XR and IR lamotrigine formulations were similar with respect to steady-state area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24 h ss), average concentration (Cavg, ss), and trough concentration (Cτ, ss). A 33% lower fluctuation in concentrations with XR was observed relative to IR lamotrigine. The time to peak concentration (Tmax, ss) was delayed for XR lamotrigine (3.0 vs 1.3 hours) with lower peak concentration (15% lower). The absolute bioavailability for IR and XR formulations was 73% and 92%, respectively. The formulations were bioequivalent with respect to AUC0-24 h ss, Cτ, ss, and Cavg, ss indicating that it may be possible to switch directly from IR to XR lamotrigine without changes in the total daily dose.

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound and total drug concentrations following intravenously administered carbamazepine in elderly and younger adult patients with epilepsy.

The objective of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of unbound and total plasma carbamazepine (CBZ) concentrations following simultaneous administration of intravenous and oral formulations. We tested the hypothesis that age-related alterations in physiology and patient characteristics influence CBZ disposition and protein binding. Patients (n = 113) on maintenance therapy received a 100 mg dose of a novel, intravenous, stable-labeled (SL) CBZ formulation as partial replacement of their morning CBZ dose. A two-compartment model described unbound and total SL-CBZ data. The stable-labeled intravenous dosing methodology enabled the estimation of the CBZ clearance (CL) and volumes of distribution. The CL of CBZ was dependent on race through the model equation unbound CL (L/hour) = 11.2 × (1.30)(Race); where Race = 1 for Caucasian, 0 for African American. Total body weight explained 57% and 70% of the interindividual variability in the central and peripheral volumes of distribution, respectively. Age, sex, smoking, plasma albumin, and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentrations had no effect on CL, binding or volumes of distribution. The model was evaluated via bootstrap and predictive check. Results may support race specific dosing for CBZ where an average African-American individual would receive 70% of the standard dose prescribed for the Caucasian person.

Application of volumetric MR spectroscopic imaging for localization of neocortical epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate volumetric proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) for localization of epileptogenic foci in neocortical epilepsy. METHODS: Twenty-five subjects reporting seizures considered to be of neocortical origin were recruited to take part in a 3-T MR study that included high-resolution structural MRI and a whole-brain MRSI acquisition. Using a fully automated MRSI processing protocol, maps for signal intensity normalized N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine, and choline were created, together with the relative volume fraction of grey-matter, white-matter, and CSF within each MRSI voxel. Analyses were performed using visual observation of the metabolite and metabolite ratio maps; voxel-based calculation of differences in these metabolite maps relative to normal controls; comparison of average grey-matter and white-matter metabolite values over each lobar volume; and examination of relative left-right asymmetry factors by brain region. RESULTS: Data from 14 subjects were suitable for inclusion in the analysis. Eight subjects had MRI-visible pathologies that were associated with decreases in NAA/creatine, which extended beyond the volume indicated by the MRI. Five subjects demonstrated no significant metabolic alterations using any of the analysis methods, and one subject had no findings on MRI or MRSI. CONCLUSIONS: This proof of principle study supports previous evidence that alterations of MR-detected brain metabolites can be detected in tissue areas affected by neocortical seizure activity, while additionally demonstrating advantages of the volumetric MRSI approach.

Characterization of the time course of carbamazepine deinduction by an enzyme turnover model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Carbamazepine is a potent inducer of drug metabolizing enzymes, which results in a number of clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Deinduction occurs when long-term carbamazepine therapy is discontinued. The goal of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the time course of carbamazepine deinduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stable-labelled carbamazepine was administered intravenously on three occasions during the deinduction period to 15 patients with epilepsy for whom carbamazepine therapy was being discontinued. Data were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model (NONMEM). An enzyme turnover model consisting of a one-compartment model linked with a hypothetical enzyme compartment was applied to characterize the time course of carbamazepine deinduction. Model evaluation was performed using the bootstrap approach and a visual predictive check. RESULTS: In the final model, the deinduction process was accomplished by decreasing the rate of enzyme synthesis, resulting in a decrease in the relative amount of enzymes. The estimated rate constant for enzyme degradation was 0.00805 h-1, corresponding to a half-life of the combined enzymes of 86.1 hours (3.6 days). CONCLUSION: An enzyme turnover model adequately characterized the experimental data. Based on the predicted enzyme half-life from the final model, the deinduction process should be completed within 2 weeks after carbamazepine therapy is terminated.

Rapid onset of seizure suppression with pregabalin adjunctive treatment in patients with partial seizures.

PURPOSE: To determine the time at which pregabalin demonstrates seizure-suppressing activity when given as adjunctive treatment to patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Data from four similar 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials in patients with refractory partial seizures were pooled to provide an adequate sample to compare the proportion of patients free of seizures on each study day between pregabalin (combined 150-600 mg/day groups) and placebo (combined groups). A generalized estimating equation (GEE) statistical model was used to perform pairwise comparisons on each study day. In several pregabalin dosage groups the dosage was escalated during days 1-7, whereas in others pregabalin was initiated at a fixed dosage without escalation. RESULTS: The proportion of patients free of seizures on any treatment day was greater in the combined pregabalin groups compared with baseline. Differences were not observed between the placebo group and baseline. A significantly greater proportion of patients were free of seizures in the combined pregabalin 150-600 mg/day and the pregabalin 600 mg/day fixed-dosage groups compared with the placebo groups from treatment day 2 onward (p < 0.05). From day 8 (coinciding with completion of the 1-week dosage-escalation period in two studies) onward, the proportion of patients free of seizures per day in the pregabalin groups remained relatively constant. DISCUSSION: This exploratory analysis of a refractory population using a rigorous endpoint demonstrates that pregabalin rapidly reduced the frequency of partial seizures. At the dosing schemes most commonly used in placebo-controlled trials, significant seizure-suppressing activity was observed after only 2 days of treatment.

Defining and diagnosing epilepsy in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: To distinguish between nonepileptic and epileptic seizures and further categorize epileptic seizures. To describe the prevalence and risk factors related to epilepsy in the elderly, including seizure triggers. To explain how to evaluate elderly patients who present with seizure symptoms. DATA SOURCES: Live symposium presentation based on clinical practice and research. Current clinical research and guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Seizures and epilepsy are prevalent in the elderly (> or =65 years of age). It is important to recognize that seizures in the elderly may present differently and can mimic other conditions common in the aged. Consultant pharmacists should understand these differences and be able to classify seizure types to allow for more appropriate treatment and management recommendations.

Epilepsy in the elderly: medications and pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pharmacokinetics of the different antiepileptic drugs. To discuss optimal pharmacologic use of antiepileptic therapy as it relates to elderly individuals taking multiple medications. To understand the controversy over generic versus brand-name antiepileptic drugs. DATA SOURCES: Live symposium presentation based on clinical practice and research. CONCLUSIONS: While the goal of antiepileptic drug therapy is to have patients be seizure-free without experiencing side effects, this ideal may be difficult to achieve. Classical and newer antiepileptic drugs have varying mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics that consultant pharmacists must understand. Because of the potential of drug interactions, selecting an appropriate antiepileptic drug requires a thorough assessment of patient health history to determine which therapy will be most effective and safe. Generic options are available and are effective for some, but concerns about bioequivalence make their use controversial.

Managing epilepsy: issues in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: To describe key factors that can affect treatment of epilepsy in the elderly. To outline steps to reduce or discontinue antiepileptic drug therapy in those who have been seizure-free. To design a care plan for a resident with a diagnosis of epilepsy. DATA SOURCES: Live symposium presentation based on clinical practice and research. CONCLUSIONS: Treating and managing epilepsy in the elderly may be complicated by confounding factors, including comorbidities and polypharmacy. Special attention must be paid to reduce drug interactions and monitor for effectiveness and toxicity. Consultant pharmacists play a key role in managing patients with epilepsy, and nursing facilities should strive to integrate consultant pharmacists into all stages of care plan development and revision.

Topiramate in older patients with partial-onset seizures: a pilot double-blind, dose-comparison study.

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can be altered by age-related changes in physiology, thereby altering clinical effects, especially tolerability, in older adults. We compared two dosages of topiramate (TPM) in a pilot study of patients >or=60 years of age with partial-onset seizures. METHODS: In this 24-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, patients with one or more seizures in previous 6 months were randomized to treatment with 50 or 200 mg/day TPM. TPM was initiated as monotherapy or added to one AED and titrated by 25 mg/day per week to target or maximum tolerated dose as the concomitant AED, if any, was withdrawn. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized to the 50 mg/day TPM (mean age, 68 years) and 39-200 mg/day TPM (69 years). Seizure control was similar with the two dosages when TPM could be used as monotherapy, whereas 200 mg TPM was more effective than 50 mg in patients requiring adjunctive therapy. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar for the two dosages--66% with 50 mg and 62% with 200 mg TPM. Most common adverse events were somnolence (TPM 50, 13%; TPM 200, 8%), dizziness (13% vs. 8%), and headache (13% vs. 5%). Of 10 (13%) patients reporting a cognitive-related adverse event, six patients were assigned to the 50-mg group. A total of 14 patients (18%; seven in each group) discontinued TPM due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study supports the practice of using low-to-moderate dosages of AEDs in older adults.

Population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in elderly patients.

Lamotrigine is being used more frequently in elderly patients. Dosing of lamotrigine in elderly patients is based largely on studies from younger adults and not evidence-based data from elderly patients. The goal of this study is to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters, such as clearance, and the factors that have a significant effect on these parameters to provide evidence-based information that can be used to dose elderly patients taking lamotrigine. Lamotrigine plasma concentrations from 148 elderly patients (aged 59-92 years) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. Data were analyzed using NONMEM. Model evaluation was performed using the bootstrap approach and predictive check. The results showed that the blood urea nitrogen/serum creatinine ratio, weight, and phenytoin use significantly affect apparent clearance of lamotrigine. These results show that clinicians may need to take into account these covariates when dosing lamotrigine in this population.

Special issues in the management of young children, older adults, and the developmentally disabled.

The very young, the very old, and those with developmental disability have an increased risk of both epilepsy and prolonged and repetitive seizures. The special issues that affect their management are reviewed. Polypharmacy that occurs because of comorbid illnesses requiring chronic medication can result in dangerous drug-drug interactions. The antiepileptic drug's pharmacokinetic profile must be factored when treating young children and older adults. Patients who have taken an older enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug for years may have a markedly induced hepatic enzyme system that may alter drug metabolism. Overdose or toxicity may occur in older adults who may metabolize and clear antiepileptic drugs more slowly than younger patients. Benzodiazepines are the most rapidly effective acute therapy for repetitive or prolonged seizures. It is important to have a plan for management of prolonged and repetitive seizures. Long-term therapy should be managed in a manner that will eliminate the need for rescue therapies and visits to the emergency department.

Diagnosing epilepsy in the elderly.

Elderly individuals represent the fastest-growing segment of the US population. Seizures are common among elderly persons, and the etiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis of seizure disorders can often differ between elderly patients and younger individuals. However, published information regarding the diagnosis and management of epilepsy in elderly patients is scarce. Because a number of conditions that are common in elderly patients may resemble epilepsy, diagnosis can be challenging. Cardiovascular conditions, migraines, drug effects, infections, metabolic disturbances, sleep disorders, and psychiatric disorders are all associated with signs and symptoms that may often mimic epilepsy. New paradigms must be put into practice to establish an accurate diagnosis in the elderly patient; besides an initial evaluation, the patient history and an electroencephalogram should be obtained. Proper diagnosis is essential for proper treatment in the elderly patient.

Recruitment and retention in clinical trials of the elderly.

The recruitment and retention of elderly patients in clinical trials provide many challenges. Factors affecting recruitment, retention, and cost of recruitment are discussed in this chapter. Various methods are described that were used in recruiting and retaining elderly patients in a Veterans Affairs (VA) Administration clinical trial that compared two newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), gabapentin and lamotrigine, to the established standard AED, carbamazepine. Various strategies were utilized in the VA study to improve recruitment, and each strategy's overall effectiveness was monitored. Modification of the patient inclusion criteria, by lowering the age of eligibility from 65 to 60 years, added approximately 100 patients to the study. Replacing five trial sites that had poor recruiting records, extending the patient recruitment period by 3 months, and conducting site visits also improved patient recruitment rates, such that 82.4% of target enrollment (720 patients) was achieved. The main reasons that screened patients were excluded from the study included: lack of seizures during the prior 3 months, unstable medical condition, adequate treatment with an AED, satisfaction with current treatment, and the inability to give informed consent. Retaining patients for 1 year was the primary outcome measure of this trial, with 46.8% of patients completing the year. The most common reasons for early termination were study drug-related adverse events (43.0%) and lack of seizure control (10.8%). Comorbidities and polypharmacy occurred more frequently in the elderly, and both had a negative influence on recruitment and retention.