Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network.

CONTEXT: Intrauterine infection is thought to be one cause of preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM). Antibiotic therapy has been shown to prolong pregnancy, but the effect on infant morbidity has been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To determine if antibiotic treatment during expectant management of PPROM will reduce infant morbidity. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: University hospitals of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. PATIENTS: A total of 614 of 804 eligible gravidas with PPROM between 24 weeks' and 0 days' and 32 weeks' and 0 days' gestation who were considered candidates for pregnancy prolongation and had not received corticosteroids for fetal maturation or antibiotic treatment within 1 week of randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous ampicillin (2-g dose every 6 hours) and erythromycin (250-mg dose every 6 hours) for 48 hours followed by oral amoxicillin (250-mg dose every 8 hours) and erythromycin base (333-mg dose every 8 hours) for 5 days vs a matching placebo regimen. Group B streptococcus (GBS) carriers were identified and treated. Tocolysis and corticosteroids were prohibited after randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The composite primary outcome included pregnancies complicated by at least one of the following: fetal or infant death, respiratory distress, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, stage 2 or 3 necrotizing enterocolitis, or sepsis within 72 hours of birth. These perinatal morbidities were also evaluated individually and pregnancy prolongation was assessed. RESULTS: In the total study population, the primary outcome (44.1 % vs 52.9%; P=.04), respiratory distress (40.5% vs 48.7%; P=.04), and necrotizing enterocolitis (2.3% vs 5.8%; P=.03) were less frequent with antibiotics. In the GBS-negative cohort, the antibiotic group had less frequent primary outcome (44.5% vs 54.5%; P=.03), respiratory distress (40.8% vs 50.6%; P=.03), overall sepsis (8.4% vs 15.6%; P=.01), pneumonia (2.9% vs 7.0%; P=.04), and other morbidities. Among GBS-negative women, significant pregnancy prolongation was seen with antibiotics (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that women with expectantly managed PPROM remote from term receive antibiotics to reduce infant morbidity.

Prenatal screening for group B Streptococcus. I. Impact of antepartum screening on antenatal prophylaxis and intrapartum care.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate current obstetric practice regarding screening and prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus and to evaluate the impact of screening on antepartum and intrapartum care. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1232 members of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians were asked to indicate their practices regarding screening for group B Streptococcus. Respondents were then asked their practices regarding antepartum and intrapartum prophylaxis on the basis of screening cultures, prior antimicrobial treatment, and other risk factors for neonatal sepsis. RESULTS: Of the 925 respondents (75.1%), 30.8% performed routine screening in all pregnancies: first prenatal visit (42.3%), 26 to 28 weeks (41.3%), and 34 to 38 weeks (22.1%). In addition, 65.9% would screen patients only under high-risk situations. Although 70.5% sample multiple sites, respondents were inconsistent regarding the sites from which cultures are obtained: distal vagina (64.2%), cervix (53.9%), proximal vagina (40.0%), anal canal (38.5%), and urethra (4.3%). A total of 34.7% of respondents would treat the patient at the time of a positive culture. Knowledge of maternal group B Streptococcus carriage would significantly alter intrapartum prophylaxis in low-risk (60.3% vs 0.5%) and various high-risk populations (74.0% to 98.4% vs 11.3% to 55.0%). However, no consensus as to optimal practice was identified. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates significant inconsistencies in screening and prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus by specialists in maternal-fetal medicine. In addition, it reveals that the recommendations of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics are not routinely followed by these specialists. Knowledge of group B Streptococcus carriage significantly increases antepartum and intrapartum treatment regardless of the presence of other risk factors for neonatal sepsis. The impact of this practice on neonatal therapy warrants further evaluation.

Prenatal screening for group B Streptococcus. II. Impact of antepartum screening and prophylaxis on neonatal care.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to evaluate the current practice of antimicrobial prophylaxis of preterm and low-birth-weight infants and to determine the impact of intrapartum fever, group B Streptococcus carriage, intrapartum antimicrobial therapy, and duration of membrane rupture on neonatal therapy. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1356 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics were asked their practice regarding neonatal screening and antimicrobial prophylaxis. Respondents were asked to define how maternal fever, group B Streptococcus carriage, intrapartum antimicrobial therapy, and prolonged membrane rupture would affect their decisions regarding neonatal therapy. RESULTS: A total of 982 responses were obtained (72.4%). Routine antimicrobial prophylaxis is given to asymptomatic preterm neonates by 33.7% of pediatricians. Prophylaxis is inconsistently given at 32 to 36 weeks but is nearly universal after intrapartum fever, regardless of intrapartum therapy. If empiric intrapartum prophylaxis was given before a preterm birth, both the incidence (47.1% vs 29.1%) and frequency of prolonged neonatal therapy (30.1% vs 17.4% > or = 7 days) would be increased. Knowledge of maternal group B Streptococcus carriage would lead to a 2.6-fold increase in treatment (75.1% vs 29.1%) and 1.8-fold increase in the incidence of prolonged therapy of preterm infants (30.9% vs 17.4%), with 45.3% giving antibiotics for > or = 1 week if intrapartum treatment had been instituted. Surprisingly, 18% of pediatricians would treat term neonates without any risk factors other than maternal group B streptococcal carriage, and 32.7% would continue treatment for > or = 7 days. The majority of pediatricians (82.6%) felt that intrapartum prophylaxis would reduce early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis, but only 46.0% felt overall neonatal sepsis would be decreased by such therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Antepartum screening and intrapartum prophylaxis against group B Streptococcus by obstetricians may lead to an increased incidence and duration of treatment of preterm and term neonates by the pediatrician. The efficacy, cost, and risk of such treatment in broadly applied screening and treatment programs should be considered before a standard of care is established.