ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Although the proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) were shown to significantly lower low-density lipoprotein and reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in clinical trials, there is a dearth of use data on these agents in real-world settings. This study compares PCSK9i use in a population of real-world patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or familial hypercholesterolemia. This was a matched cohort study of adult patients who were dispensed a PCSK9i along with adult patients who did not receive a PCSK9i. PCSK9i patients were matched on a propensity to have received a PCSK9i score up to 1:10 to non-PCSK9i patients. The primary outcomes were changes in cholesterol levels. Secondary outcomes included a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, and ischemic strokes along with health care utilization during follow-up. Adjusted conditional, multivariate Cox proportional hazards, and negative binomial modeling were performed. Ninety-one PCSK9i patients were matched to 840 non-PCSK9i patients. Seventy-one percent of PCSK9i patients either discontinued or switched PCSK9i therapy. PCSK9i patients had greater median reductions in low-density lipoprotein (-73.0 mg/dL vs. -30.0 mg/dL) and total (-77.0 vs. -31.0) cholesterol (both P < 0.001). No adjusted between-group differences in the composite outcome or individual components of the composite outcome were identified (all P > 0.05). PCSK9i patients had a lower rate of medical office visits during follow-up (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.61, P = 0.019). These findings support the effectiveness of PCSK9i therapy in real-world settings but suggest that use may be limited by PCSK9i adverse reactions and patient cost barriers.
Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents , Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Adult , Humans , PCSK9 Inhibitors , Cholesterol, LDL , Cohort Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Subtilisin/therapeutic use , Proprotein Convertase 9 , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
The few studies that compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. warfarin in the setting of advanced renal insufficiency have focused on patients with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this observational, matched, cohort study of patients was to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOAC vs. warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30 mL/min. This observational, cohort study included patients with VTE and CrCl < 30 mL/min who were newly initiated on a DOAC or warfarin between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. DOAC patients were matched up to 1:2 to warfarin patients. Primary outcome was a composite of recurrent VTE, clinically-relevant bleeding, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted conditional, multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess outcomes. 626 DOAC patients were matched to 1071 warfarin patients. DOAC patients had a higher mean age, higher mean baseline CrCl, and were less likely to have been receiving dialysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the composite outcome between groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.47) or in the individual components of the composite (all HR 95% CI crossed 1.00). Identification of statistically non-significant rates of bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes suggest that the use of DOAC or warfarin is reasonable in patients with VTE and CrCl < 30 mL/min.
