Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Practice patterns and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly relied on to bridge patients with respiratory failure to lung transplantation despite limited evidence for its use in this setting. This study evaluated longitudinal trends in practice patterns, patient characteristics, and outcomes in patients bridged with ECMO to lung transplant. METHODS: A retrospective review of all adult isolated lung transplant patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2019 was performed. Patients were classified as "ECMO" if supported with ECMO at the time of listing or transplantation and "non-ECMO" otherwise. Linear regression was used to evaluate trends in patient demographics during the study period. Trends in mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards modeling, with time period as the primary covariate (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, or 2015-2019) and age, time on the waitlist, and underlying diagnosis as covariates. RESULTS: The number of patients included were 40,866, of whom 1,387 (3.4%) were classified as ECMO and 39,479 (96.6%) as no ECMO. Average age and initial Lung Allocation Score increased significantly during the study period in both cohorts, but occurred at a slower rate in the ECMO population. The hazard of death was significantly lower in more recent years (2015-2019) for both the ECMO and non-ECMO cohorts (aHR (adjusted hazards ratio) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.96 and aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.79) when compared to the early years (2000-2004) of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplantation survival for patients bridged to transplantation with ECMO demonstrates ongoing improvement despite cannulation of progressively older and sicker patients.

A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify key elements for a recommended model. Methods: We searched PubMed and four other engines for animal ECPR studies examining neurological outcomes. Inclusion criteria were: animals experiencing cardiac arrest, ECPR/ECMO interventions, comparisons of short versus long cardiac arrest times, and neurological outcomes. Results: Among 20 identified ECPR animal studies (n = 442), 13 pigs, 4 dogs, and 3 rats were used. Only 10% (2/20) included both sexes. Significant heterogeneity was observed in experimental protocols. 90% (18/20) employed peripheral VA-ECMO cannulation and 55% (11/20) were survival models (median survival = 168 hours; ECMO duration = 60 minutes). Ventricular fibrillation (18/20, 90%) was the most common method for inducing cardiac arrest with a median duration of 15 minutes (IQR = 6-20). In two studies, cardiac arrests exceeding 15 minutes led to considerable mortality and neurological impairment. Among seven studies utilizing neuromonitoring tools, only four employed multimodal devices to evaluate cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue oxygenation, and intracranial pressure. None examined cerebral autoregulation or neurovascular coupling. Conclusions: The substantial heterogeneity in ECPR preclinical model protocols leads to limited reproducibility and multiple challenges. The recommended model includes large animals with both sexes, standardized pre-operative protocols, a cardiac arrest time between 10-15 minutes, use of multimodal methods to evaluate neurological outcomes, and the ability to survive animals after conducting experiments.

Rising Mortality in Coronavirus-19 Patients Supported With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

We aimed to describe practice patterns and outcomes in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support throughout the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with the hypothesis that mortality would improve as we accumulated knowledge and experience. We included 48 patients supported on veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) at a single institution between April 2020 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into three waves based on cannulation date, corresponding to the wild-type (wave 1), alpha (wave 2), and delta (wave 3) variants. One hundred percent of patients in waves 2 and 3 received glucocorticoids, compared with 29% in wave 1 ( p < 0.01), and the majority received remdesivir (84% and 92% in waves 2 and 3, vs . 35% in wave 1; p < 0.01). Duration of pre-ECMO noninvasive ventilation was longer in waves 2 and 3 (mean 8.8 days and 3.9 days, vs . 0.7 days in wave 1; p < 0.01), as was time to cannulation (mean 17.2 and 14.6 days vs . 8.8 days in wave 1; p < 0.01) and ECMO duration (mean 55.7 days and 43.0 days vs . 28.4 days in wave 1; p = 0.02). Mortality in wave 1 was 35%, compared with 63% and 75% in waves 2 and 3 ( p = 0.05). These results suggest an increased prevalence of medically refractory disease and rising mortality in later variants of COVID-19.

Cardiac Surgery Outcomes: A Case for Increased Screening and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Because of the limited published information on complications that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients experience during and after cardiac surgery, we investigated OSA as a risk factor for postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This project used the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group's data collected between 2011 and 2017 based on The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Data Collections form. A retrospective analysis of 1555 patients with OSA and 10,450 patients without OSA across 5 medical centers undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, isolated valve surgery, and combined coronary artery bypass grafting valve surgery was conducted. We used 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching with no replacement to balance characteristics among patients with and without OSA. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increased risk of postoperative pneumonia, increased length of total and postoperative stay, and time to initial extubation. Two outcomes trended toward significance: intra- and postoperative intraaortic balloon pump use. Outcomes that failed to show statistical significance were surgical site infection, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident, permanent pacemaker placement, and blood products given. A chart review conducted on a subset of the study cohort revealed that more than 40% of OSA patients did not receive continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure therapy postoperatively during their hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study aligns with the literature in concluding that OSA has deleterious effects on postoperative outcomes of cardiac surgery patients. Further research to better stratify OSA patients by severity are still needed. Additionally heightened awareness of the need to screen, diagnose, and properly treat patients for OSA is needed.