Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 87: 105694, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physical exercise programs are commonly designed without consideration for sex differences. Nevertheless, disease progression exhibits sex-specific patterns, resulting in different functionality and strength performances. OBJECTIVES: To analyze sex differences in strength, functional capacity, and mobility, and to evaluate sex-dependent differences in leg strength in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 35 participants (female: n = 19; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)= 3.0 ± 1.2, male: n = 16; EDSS= 3.3 ± 1.2). Body composition, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), explosive strength (rate of force development, RFD), central activation ratio (CAR), functional capacity, and mobility were assessed. RESULTS: Differences were observed between males and females (p = 0.001) in height, lean body mass and MVIC. No differences were observed in the other variables. Regarding the leg asymmetry, men showed higher values in the stronger leg for both MVIC (p < 0.001, d=large) and RFD, whereas women showed higher values only in RFD. Men with MS demonstrated a greater capacity to produce maximal strength than women with this disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results found suggest that maximum strength differs between men and women in our sample of patients with multiple sclerosis. Furthermore, the weaker leg, regardless of sex, exhibits poorer results in explosive strength compared to the stronger leg. However, maximum strength only shows differences in men and not in women. Therefore, these findings should serve as a basis for rehabilitation professionals when planning training programs for this population.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Muscle Strength , Sex Characteristics , Humans , Female , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Body Composition/physiology , Leg/physiopathology , Sex Factors
2.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med ; 9(4): e001797, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38022757

ABSTRACT

The relationship between multiple sclerosis (MS) and females is a crucial aspect in the development of the disease, with the ovarian hormonal cycle being a sensitive stage, especially in females with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The objectives of the study are to identify moderating variables that modify satisfaction with physical activity practice throughout the menstrual cycle (MC) in females in or out of their MC, during high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and strength training sessions and to compare the acute effects of different types of physical activity sessions in females with and without MS. This protocol is the methodology used in the EMMA Study, a randomised, single-blind crossover trial study conducted in females with MS who were matched 1:1, based on age, lifestyle factors and country of residence, with females without MS, to analyse the effect of physical activity practice on satisfaction, functionality, fatigue and inflammatory profile through their MC. Participants will visit the facilities approximately 10 times (4 preliminary familiarisation visits and 6 visits to carry out a physical activity session in each phase of the MC) for 3-4 months. A total sample of 30 females (15 females without MS and 15 with MS) is necessary for the study. The evaluation will comprise clinical, nutritional and psychological interviews, including different variables. It is hypothesised during the luteal phase, females with MS are expected to exhibit different acute responses to HIIT and strength training sessions as compared with females without the disease. Before starting the study, all participants will read and sign an informed consent form. Trial registration number: This research protocol is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov to ensure transparency and accessibility of study information (NCT06105463). The university's ethics committee number for this study is UALBIO2022/048.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...