Role of medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural effusions.

BACKGROUND: Medical thoracoscopy (semi-rigid and rigid thoracoscopy) have revolutionized the management of undiagnosed pleural effusions. Though semi-rigid thoracoscopy has a good diagnostic yield in malignant and tubercular effusions, its role in the management of a complicated pleural effusions is debatable. Hence, rigid thoracoscopy becomes handy in these cases. The present study looked into the role of medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural effusions in different conditions. METHODS: This study included all patients who underwent medical thoracoscopy at our center between May-2010 and March-2020. Basic demographics data, type of medical thoracoscopy used, and histopathology details were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 373 patients were subjected to medical thoracoscopy (202 semi-rigid thoracoscopy and 171 rigid thoracoscopy). Out of whom 246 (66%) were males, the mean age was 51.9 ± 13.2 years. Diagnosis was achieved in 370 patients with a yield of 99.2%. The diagnostic yield in semi-rigid thoracoscopy was 99.5% with lung malignancy being the most common diagnosis (41%; n = 81), followed by tuberculosis (31%; n = 61). The diagnostic yield in rigid thoracoscopy was 100% in our study. Along with high diagnostic yield, complete drainage and lung expansion was seen in 93.5% (160 out of 171 patients) without requiring a second procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Semi-rigid thoracoscopy and rigid thoracoscopy should complement each other in the diagnosis of pleural effusions. Rigid thoracoscopy should be considered as the procedure of choice in a complicated pleural effusion.

Role of medical thoracoscopy in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions.

OBJECTIVE: The role of medical thoracoscopy in the treatment of pleural infections is increasingly being recognized. This study was done to assess the role of medical thoracoscopy in the management of carefully selected subset of patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions (PPEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data of 164 thoracoscopic procedures performed at our center on patients with complicated PPE in the past 10 years. Patients were subjected to medical thoracoscopy based on ultrasonographic stratification and a computed tomography (CT) thorax. Medical thoracoscopy was performed after an intercostal block under conscious sedation with midazolam (2 mg) and fentanyl (50 mcg) and local anesthesia with lignocaine 2% (10-15 ml), through a single port 10 mm diameter thoracoscope. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients (119 males and 45 females) underwent medical thoracoscopy during the study period. The mean age was 47.4 ± 15.9 (median, 50; range, 16-86). The final diagnosis by thoracoscopy was bacterial empyema in 93 patients and tuberculosis in 71 patients. Medical thoracoscopy was successful without subsequent intervention in 160 (97.5%) patients, two patients underwent a second procedure, in the form of decortication, and two patients died due to sepsis. There were no major procedure-related complications that required intervention. CONCLUSION: Early adhesiolysis and drainage of fluid using medical thoracoscopy should be considered in patients with multiloculated complicated PPE after careful radiological (ultrasonography and CT) stratification, as a more cost-effective and safe method of management.

Multidisciplinary team obviates biopsy in most patients with diffuse parenchymal lung diseases-A retrospective study from India.

INTRODUCTION: The inflammation and fibrosis in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs) in varied proportions give rise to different patterns in radiology and histopathology. The radiological pattern on CT of the thorax most often allows us to make a diagnosis with varying levels of confidence, to optimize management. With a multidisciplinary team bringing the strengths of their individual domains of knowledge, clinical, radiological, histopathological, and in many cases rheumatological, the level of confidence in making this diagnosis increases, often to the stage where the diagnosis is most often right, is concordant with the diagnosis achieved at histopathology and therefore obviates the need for lung biopsy which carries its own costs and risks of complications. Our study emphasizes the role of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the management of DPLDs at a tertiary care referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Every case of DPLD presenting to our pulmonology department was discussed in an MDT meeting before subjecting them to any diagnostic intervention or therapy. A clinico-radiological diagnosis was made according to the 2002 ATS/ERS guidelines initially. Later an official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and a 2013 ATS/ERS consensus for the classification and diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia was used. The concordance in our study was defined as the percentage of histopathological diagnoses that were identical to the clinico-radiological MDT diagnosis prior to the biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 434 patients with DPLDs were evaluated. The MDT suggested biopsy for only 38.7% (168/434) patients since the pattern was very clear in 266 (61.3%) cases. As not all patients consented to undergo the biopsy procedure when recommended, histopathology was obtained in 102 patients. The histological diagnosis was concordant with the initial MDT diagnosis in 80.3% (82/102) of samples. On an individual basis, connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease and sarcoidosis showed the best concordance (87%). In idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonitis (NSIP) cases, the histopathological diagnosis concurred in only 53.3% (8/15), out of which 8 were NSIP, 4 were usual interstitial pneumonia, and 3 were reported as inadequate sampling on histopathology. CONCLUSION: The MDT plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of DPLDs. Not every pattern requires biopsy confirmation. However, an idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonitis diagnosis by the MDT should probably be better confirmed by biopsy.