Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(3): 297-303, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928376

ABSTRACT

Hair loss, in particular androgenetic alopecia, has troubled humans since the dawn of history. Treatment options for hair restoration have undergone massive transformation from punch grafting to follicular unit transplantation. Current surgical treatment options in hair restoration fall broadly under two categories, follicular unit transplantation most commonly known as strip method and follicular unit extraction (FUE). The strip method though widely used initially is not so common now due to its fair share of disadvantages ranging from linear donor scar, scar widening to strip overharvesting and wastage of grafts. Follicular unit excision (FUE) was introduced as an alternative method for extraction of grafts to combat the donor linear scar produced by strip method but the disadvantages of FUE include the number of grafts harvested in a single session, moth eaten appearance of donor area caused by over extraction of grafts and harvesting from outside the safe zone. Newer developments like extraction of axillary hair, body hair and pubic hair have been sought to overcome the limitations of number of grafts harvested in a single session of FUE. With more patients now affected by alopecia in their early 20s, there is an ever-increasing demand from the patients for the youthful hairline and hence the focus has shifted towards mega and giga sessions of hair transplantation which pose danger of over extraction of grafts leading to depletion of available donor sites. This article elaborates the combined sequential strip and FUE method along with an intraoperative calculation model to overcome the limitations of over extraction and wastage of grafts. (1) Combination of techniques Strip method with FUE. (2) An intraoperative calculation model that aids in limiting over extraction and wastage of grafts. (3) It is a real time model which can be applied in practice with ease.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Cicatrix , Hair Follicle , Humans , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Hair/transplantation , Alopecia/surgery
2.
Acta Trop ; 183: 84-91, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29625090

ABSTRACT

Culex mosquitoes can act as vectors of several important diseases, including Japanese encephalitis, West Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis and equine encephalitis. Besides the neurological sequelae caused in humans, Japanese encephalitis can lead to abortion in sows and encephalitis in horses. Effective vector control and early diagnosis, along with continuous serosurveillance in animals, are crucial to fight this arboviral disease. However, the success of vector control operations is linked with the fast and reliable identification of targeted species, and knowledge about their biology and ecology. Since the DNA barcoding of Culex vectors of Japanese encephalitis is scarcely explored, here we evaluated the efficacy of this tool to identify and analyze the variations among five overlooked Culex vectors of Japanese encephalitis, Culex fuscocephala, Culex gelidus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex pseudovishnui and Culex vishnui, relying to the analysis of mitochondrial CO1 gene. Variations in their base pair range were elucidated by the entropy Hx plot. The differences among individual conspecifics and on base pair range across the same were studied. The C (501-750 bp) region showed a moderate variation among all the selected species. C. tritaeniorhynchus exhibited the highest variation in all the ranges. The observed genetic divergence was partially non-discriminatory. i.e., the overall intra- and inter nucleotide divergence was 0.0920 (0.92%) and 0.125 (1.25%), respectively. However, 10X rule fits accurately intraspecies divergence <3% for the five selected Culex species. The analysis of individual scatter plots showed threshold values (10X) of 0.008 (0.08%), 0.005 (0.05%), 0.123 (1.23%), 0.033 (0.33%) and 0.019 (0.19%) for C. fuscocephala, C. gelidus, C. tritaeniorhynchus, C. pseudovishnui and C. vishnui, respectively. The C. tritaeniorhynchus haplotypes KU497604, KU497603, AB690847 and AB690854 exhibited the highest divergence range, i.e., from 0.465 -0.546. Comparatively, the intra-divergence among the other haplotypes of C. tritaeniorhynchus ranged from 0-0.056. The maximum parsimony tree was formed by distinctive conspecific clusters with appreciable branch values illustrating their close congruence and extensive genetic deviations. Overall, this study adds valuable knowledge to the molecular biology and systematics of five overlooked mosquito species acting as major vectors of Japanese encephalitis in Asian countries.


Subject(s)
Culex/genetics , DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic , Encephalitis, Japanese/transmission , Mosquito Vectors/genetics , Animals , Asia , Culex/physiology , Ecology , Genetic Variation , Haplotypes , Humans , Mosquito Vectors/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...