Mutation screening of the RYR1-cDNA from peripheral B-lymphocytes in 15 Swedish malignant hyperthermia index cases.

BACKGROUND: Malignant hyperthermia (MH), linked to the ryanodine receptor 1 gene (RYR1) on chromosome 19, is a potentially lethal pharmacogenetic disorder which may lead to a disturbance of intracellular calcium homeostasis when susceptible individuals are exposed to halogenated anaesthetics, suxamethonium, or both. Central core disease (CCD) is a rare dominantly inherited congenital myopathy allelic to MH-susceptibility. METHODS: In this study, 14 unrelated MH-susceptible probands and one CCD patient from Sweden were screened for mutations in the RYR1. Since the RYR1 is also expressed in B-lymphocytes, RYR1-cDNA was transcribed from total RNA extracted from white blood cells. RESULTS: We detected two known RYR1 mutations and two previously described unclassified sequence variants. In addition, six novel sequence variants were detected. All mutations or sequence variants were verified on genomic DNA. Seven of the probands did not show any candidate mutation, although the total coding region of RYR1 was sequenced. Segregation data in in vitro contracture tested family members of three probands support a causative role of three of the novel sequence variants. CONCLUSIONS: Our study contributes to the genetic aetiology of MH in Sweden, but also raises questions about the involvement of genes other than RYR1 since nearly half of the probands did not show any sequence variants in the total coding region of the RYR1.

Malignant hyperthermia and central core disease causative mutations in Swedish patients.

BACKGROUND: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility is a pharmacogenetic disorder of intracellular calcium homeostasis. In susceptible individuals, halogenated anaesthetics and/or suxamethonium may trigger an MH reaction. The diagnosis of MH susceptibility is made by an in vitro contracture test of biopsied muscle strips. METHODS: In 27 MH susceptible (MHS) probands and four MH negative (MHN) probands, exons 17, 39, 40, 45 and 46 of the RYR1 gene were screened for MH causative mutations. In addition, in three patients with established central core disease (CCD), exons 17, 39, 40, 45 and 46 and exons 95, 100, 101 and 102 were screened for MH and CCD causative mutations. All screenings were performed by direct sequencing of the entire exons. RESULTS: MH causative mutations were found in five of the 27 MHS probands (19%). CCD causative mutations were found in two of three CCD patients in the C-terminal exons. None of the CCD patients showed a mutation in N-terminal exon 17 or in the central exons. CONCLUSIONS: In a Swedish population, screening of N-terminal exon 17 and the central exons for MH causative mutations in the RYR1 gene covers 19% of families. Thus, other mutations must also be responsible for MH susceptibility in Sweden. Although the number of CCD patients in this study was small, screening of the C-terminal exons for CCD causative mutations seems to be a promising tool in the process of making a diagnosis.

Reproducibility of in vitro contracture test results in patients tested for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: The in vitro contracture test (IVCT) is the golden standard to diagnose malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS). A high reproducibility is important for a high validity of a test. METHODS: We have therefore analyzed IVCT in 838 patients, investigated in two laboratories. Each halothane and caffeine test was performed in two muscle strips. The test results were analyzed with respect to reproducibility of abnormal outcomes within pairs of tested muscle strips and size of contractures, thresholds and quality criteria. The patients were tested according to the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group protocol (EMHG). To fulfill quality criteria in the EMHG protocol the twitch height should be 10 mN (1 g) or more. For the caffeine test a minimum contracture of 50 mN (5 g) or more at 32 mmol l-1 caffeine could be used as an alternative quality criterion. RESULTS: There was better reproducibility with larger contractures. The correlation between size of contractures and fraction of muscle strips with abnormal contractures was 0.77 or larger. Contractures < 5 mN (0.5 g) were reproducible in less than half of the tests. There was no difference in reproducibility or size of contractures between tests fulfillling all quality criteria and those not fulfillling these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: IVCT responses close to cut off limits, i.e. <5 mN (0.5 g) in the EMHG protocol, are less reproducible and must scientifically be considered as less reliable. The clinical cut off limits must remain unchanged for reasons of clinical safety. The outcome of quality measurements does not influence the test results.

Between-center variability of results of the in vitro contracture test for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

UNLABELLED: The in vitro contracture test (IVCT) remains the standard test for the diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility. The aim of this study was to investigate whether results of the IVCT varied between two diagnostic centers. The study took place at the national MH centers in Denmark and Sweden. Forty-three patients investigated for MH gave informed consent to have four extra muscle specimens excised. These were sent to the other center and immediately used for a parallel IVCT, according to the protocol of the European MH Group. Results of the IVCTs performed in the two centers on muscle samples from the same patients were compared. Each patient was assigned a diagnosis according to the result obtained in the "mother-center." Identical diagnostic results were obtained for 56% of the patients. The differing diagnostic outcomes were almost exclusively seen in cases with contractures of <5 mN (0.5 g) and abnormal results in only one or two muscle strips. We suggest different criteria for the interpretation of results for clinical and scientific purposes. The clinical criteria should remain unchanged. The scientific designation of susceptibility should be used in cases with contractures of > or =5 mN and abnormal results in at least 75% of the tested muscle strips. IMPLICATIONS: The diagnostic outcomes of tests for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility were compared between two laboratories by using muscle tissue from the same patients. Identical outcomes were found for 56% of the patients. Almost all diverging outcomes were seen in cases with a few small contractures near the cutoff limit. Different diagnostic criteria for clinical and scientific purposes are suggested.

In vitro contracture test for diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia following the protocol of the European MH Group: results of testing patients surviving fulminant MH and unrelated low-risk subjects. The European Malignant Hyperthermia Group.

BACKGROUND: Determination of sensitivity and specificity of the in vitro contracture test (IVCT) for malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility using the European MH Group (EMHG) protocol has been performed in some laboratories but only on a small sample from the combined EMHG. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine combined EMHG sensitivity and specificity of the test. METHODS: Results of IVCT of patients with previous fulminant MH and normal, low-risk subjects (controls) were collected from 22 centres of the EMHG. IVCT was performed according to the EMHG protocol. Patients were included in the study if the clinical crisis had a score of at least 50 points with the Clinical Grading Scale. Low-risk subjects were included provided they did not belong to a family with known MH susceptibility, they had not developed any signs of MH at previous anaesthetics, and they did not suffer from any neuromuscular disease. For inclusion of both MH patients and low-risk subjects, at least 1 muscle bundle in the IVCT should have twitches of 10 mN (1 g) or more. For evaluation of individual tests, only muscle bundles with twitch heights of 10 mN (1 g) or more were used. RESULTS: A total of 1502 probands had undergone IVCT because of a previous anaesthesia with symptoms and signs suggestive of MH. Of these, 119 had clinical scores of 50 and above. From these 119 MH-suspected patients and from 202 low-risk subjects, IVCT data were collected. Subsequently, 14 MH-suspected patients were excluded from further analysis for the following reasons: In 3 patients, the suspected MH episode could be fully explained by diseases other than MH; in 11 MHS patients, IVCT was incomplete (n = 1), data were lost (n = 3), or none of the muscle bundles fulfilled twitch criteria (n = 7). Of the remaining 105 MH-suspected patients, 89 were MHS, 10 MHEh, 5 MHEc, and one MHN. Thus, we observed a diagnostic sensitivity of the IVCT of 99.0% if the MHE group is considered susceptible (95% confidence interval 94.8-100.0%). Of the 202 low-risk subjects, 3 were MHS, 5 MHEh, 5 MHEc, and 189 MHN. This gives a specificity of the IVCT of 93.6% (95% confidence interval 89.2-96.5%). CONCLUSION: The IVCT for diagnosis of MH susceptibility in Europe has a high sensitivity and a satisfactory specificity.

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, an autosomal dominant disorder?

A large series of Swedish nuclear families, in which malignant hyperthermia (MH) reactions had occurred during anaesthesia, have been examined with respect to malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. In vitro contracture tests (IVCT) of muscle strips were conducted to diagnose MH status. Included in this series were some families where only one of the parents was tested by IVCT, while in 79 of the families both parents were tested by IVCT. Six known mutations in the gene encoding the calcium release channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal muscle (the RYR1 gene), believed to cause MHS in man, were searched for in 41 nuclear families. The present paper focuses on findings in eight families, where both parents were malignant hyperthemia negative (MHN), while at least one child was either malignant hyperthermia susceptible (MHS) or malignant hyperthermia equivocal (MHE). There was no suggestion of non-paternity. The RYR1 mutations investigated were Arg163Cys, Gly341Arg, Ile403Met, Arg614Cys, Gly2433Arg and Arg2434His. No family had any of the six RYR1 mutations searched for.

Results of in vitro contracture tests for the diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in monozygote twins.

BACKGROUND: Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility is a pharmacogenetic disorder in which susceptible individuals may develop a potentially life-threatening hypermetabolism when exposed to certain anaesthetic agents. The most common diagnostic method is the in vitro contracture test (IVCT) of skeletal muscle biopsies. There is a wide variation in the size of contractures between susceptible individuals and the reproducibility of the test in humans has not been evaluated. METHODS: We have performed the IVCT in 4 monozygote pairs of twins, which gave us on opportunity to study the reproducibility. RESULTS: The clinical diagnoses were consistent in all twin pairs, although slight differences in contractures and thresholds were seen. CONCLUSION: In this material the reproducibility of the IVCT was found to be satisfactory.

Discordance between malignant hyperthermia susceptibility and RYR1 mutation C1840T in two Scandinavian MH families exhibiting this mutation.

The ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1) mutation C1840T has been reported to segregate with malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility in several families. We have investigated several Scandinavian MH families with respect to five different RYR1 mutations reported to cause predisposition to MH, and we here report on two of the families in which the C1840T mutation was detected. In these two families there was recombination between MH susceptibility and this mutation in one and three individuals, respectively. These findings may suggest that it is necessary to reconsider the specificity of the IVCT and the role of C1840T as a cause of MH susceptibility in some families exhibiting this mutation.

Recombination between the postulated CCD/MHE/MHS locus and RYR1 gene markers.

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility is considered a subclinical myopathy or a pharmacogenetic trait, and is believed to be closely associated with central core disease (CCD). Data support the notion that MH susceptibility is heterogeneous, with the ryanodine receptor I (RYR1) locus on chromosome 19 being one locus harboring a gene that can cause MH susceptibility. The gene for CCD is believed to reside in the locus on chromosome 19. In the family presented here, a girl has CCD, and several close relatives are MH susceptible (MHS). DNA studies conducted on available family members uncovered recombination between the MH susceptibility locus and RYR1 markers. Consequently, if one postulates that the CCD gene in this family resides in the same locus as the MH susceptibility gene, an additional CCD locus different from the RYR1 locus must also be postulated.

Results of in vitro contracture testing of both parents of malignant hyperthermia susceptible probands.

BACKGROUND: Malignant Hyperthermia (MH) is regarded as a dominantly inherited condition. Therefore, most investigators do not test the second parent if the first parent is found to be MH susceptible (MHS). The purpose of this study was to validate this policy. METHODS: In vitro contracture tests (IVCT) have been performed in both parents of 101 MH susceptible probands. Diagnoses were made according to the European MH group protocol and include MH susceptible (MHS), MH equivocal (MHE) and MH negative (MHN). Our control material consists of 60 patients without any personal or family history of MH. RESULTS: Thirty-seven pairs of parents were MHS-MHN, 20 were MHE-MHN, 6 were MHS-MHS, 20 were MHS-MHE, 6 were MHE-MHE, and 12 were MHN-MHN. The frequency of MHE was greater in the parents than in the controls (26% versus 8%, P < 0.05). Several possible explanations exist: the IVCT produces false positive and/or false negative results; the MH genes may be more frequent in the population than previously expected; MH susceptibility may have more than one mode of inheritance; the mutation rate may not be negligible. Our test results in controls and fulminants point at a combination of these explanations. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that both parents should be tested whenever possible. For genetic research it is important that labelling any parent "presumed normal" may give misleading results.

RYR mutation G1021A (Gly341Arg) is not frequent in Danish and Swedish families with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a pharmacogenetic disorder. Susceptibility to MH (MHS) is presumed to be inherited in an autosomal dominant way. MH crises are triggered by halogenated inhalational anaesthetics and suxamethonium, and may be lethal if not treated early and adequately. Until now, eight mutations in the RYR1 gene have been described as causes of MHS phenotype in various MH families. The mutation RYR1 G1021A (Gly341Arg) has been reported to account for approximately 10% of Caucasian MHS cases. However, in our study this mutation was discovered in only 1 out of 89 Scandinavian families, indicating that this mutation may be the cause of MHS in only about 1% of MHS families in those populations. The mutation may have been brought to Scandinavia by an immigrant.

Evaluation of anaesthesias in malignant hyperthermia negative patients.

In vitro contracture test is still the most reliable method for diagnosing malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. In order to investigate the reliability of Malignant Hyperthermia Negative (MHN) results, a questionnaire was sent to 237 persons of whom 133 were consecutively investigated and found to be MHN, together with 104 of their children. In 17 anaesthetics with triggering agents in 7 MHN patients and 7 children of MHN patients, no signs of malignant hyperthermia were observed in any patient. This material is, however, too small to draw any conclusion about the reliability of MHN test results. This can only be done in a large multicentre study or a metaanalysis of several studies.

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility without central core disease (CCD) in a family where CCD is diagnosed.

Central Core Disease (CCD) is a myopathy closely linked to malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility. We present a family with a girl suffering from CCD. Due to the CCD diagnosis, all available relatives were investigated for MH-susceptibility. No other family member has CCD. In vitro contracture tests revealed that several relatives are MH-susceptible. Thus our results suggest that healthy members of families with CCD could be at risk for being malignant hyperthermia susceptible.

Malignant hyperthermia: the clinical syndrome.

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) reactions can be classified into four categories: the fulminant form, the abortive MH, the masseter spasm and atypical presentations. The latter group includes syndromes such as hyperthermia and heat strokes, sudden death and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. The different signs and symptoms of each category are recalled thus offering criteria for the differential diagnosis with other clinical entities.