ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: PEPDar compared the tolerability and safety of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r)-based post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with the tolerability and safety of standard of care (SOC). The primary endpoint was the early discontinuation rate among the per-protocol population. METHODS: PEPDar was an open-label, randomized, multicentre, prospective, noninferiority safety study. Subjects were stratified by type of event (occupational vs. nonoccupational, i.e. sexual) and were randomized to receive DRV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) or SOC PEP. Twenty-two private or university HIV clinics in Germany participated. Subjects were ≥ 18 years old and had documented or potential HIV exposure and indication for HIV PEP. They initiated PEP not later than 72 h after the event and were HIV negative. RESULTS: A total of 324 subjects were screened, the per-protocol population was 305, and 273 subjects completed the study. One hundred and fifty-five subjects received DRV/r-based PEP and 150 subjects received ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based PEP for 28-30 days; 298 subjects also received tenofovir/emtricitabine. The early discontinuation rate in the DRV/r arm was 6.5% compared with 10.0% in the SOC arm (P = 0.243). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 68% of DRV/r subjects and 75% of SOC subjects (P = 0.169). Fewer DRV/r subjects (16.1%) had at least one grade 2 or 3 ADR compared with SOC subjects (29.3%) (P = 0.006). All grades of diarrhoea, nausea, and sleep disorders were significantly less frequent with DRV/r, while headache was significantly more frequent. No HIV seroconversion was reported during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Noninferiority of DRV/r to SOC was demonstrated. DRV/r should be included as a standard component of recommended regimens in PEP guidelines.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Darunavir/administration & dosage , Darunavir/adverse effects , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Ritonavir/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Withholding TreatmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of highly active combined antiretroviral therapy (c-ART) mortality and morbidity of HIV patients declined substantially. Earlier studies reported that c-ART was able to save health-care costs due to a reduction of other direct medical costs, particularly for inpatient treatments and concomitant medication. To date, analyses of costs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients under c-ART are lacking in Germany. Hence, this study aims to estimate the current cost of illness and HRQOL of HIV-patients under c-ART in different treatment lines. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective observational study was carried out in 12 specialised German centres for infectious diseases: 8 private practices/outpatient centres and 4 specialised hospitals offering both inpatient and outpatient services. Demographic, clinical and medication data were derived from patient records. Resource utilisation, information on productivity, out of pocket costs and HRQOL (EQ-5D) were collected every 12 weeks via a patient questionnaire. All costs were calculated based on price information from publicly accessible databases. RESULTS: N=1,154 patients were included in the analysis. Mean direct disease-related costs of -patients under c-ART amounted to 22,563 Euro/year. Patients beyond the 3(rd) line of treatment -incurred considerably higher costs 24,654 Euro/year. In the 1(st) treatment line, c-ART accounted for 83.2% of the total direct costs, in the 2(nd)/3(rd) line for 80.8% and in >3(rd) line for 83.4%, respectively. Indirect costs due to impaired productivity were higher in the 2(nd)/3(rd) treatment line (2,843 Euro) compared to the 1(st) (1,604 Euro) and >3(rd) (1,752 Euro) treatment lines, respectively. The average HRQOL (EQ-5D) varied between 0.77 (self-assessment via visual analogue scale) and 0.91 (utility score based on the German time trade-off tariff). CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, cost of illness of HIV patients under c-ART decreased slightly with average costs per year still being substantial. Main cost driver of overall costs is c-ART. There have been, however, noticeable shifts between different cost domains.
