Pretreatment plasma testosterone and estradiol levels in patients with locally advanced or metastasized prostatic cancer. FINNPROSTATE Group.

BACKGROUND: Studies concerning pretreatment plasma hormonal environment in relation to stage of prostatic cancer have given conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to compare the pretreatment plasma testosterone (T), free T (fT), estradiol (E2), and free E2 (fE2) levels in patients with locally advanced (T3-4 M0) and metastatic (T1-4 M1) prostatic cancer, and to further examine the effect of the patients' general condition on these levels. METHODS: The present series consisted of 238 patients (Finnprostate 6 study). The variables analyzed were E2, fE2, T, fT, age, body mass index (BMI), sex hormone binding globulin capacity (SHBG), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), hemoglobin concentration (Hb), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and performance status (PS). RESULTS: The E2 and fE2 levels were significantly higher in M0 patients than in M1 patients, with no significant differences in T and fT levels. In multivariate analyses, a decline in performance status (PS), an increase in ESR, or a decrease in Hb, were related to a decrease in T, fT, E2, or fE2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment plasma estradiol was significantly lower in M1 patients than in M0 patients, but there were no significant differences in T levels, although the poor general condition was related to a decrease in the pretreatment levels of both testosterone and estradiol.

Parenteral polyoestradiol phosphate vs orchidectomy in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. Efficacy and cardiovascular complications: a 2-year follow-up report of a national, prospective prostatic cancer study. Finnprostate Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and cardiovascular complications of orchidectomy or polyoestradiol phosphate (PEP) in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study 444 patients (mean age 73 years, range 45-91) with T3-4 M0 or T1-4 M1 prostatic cancer were treated either by orchidectomy (group 1, n = 217) or parenteral PEP (group 2, n = 227; 240 mg/month). The patients were examined at 3 and 6 months after start of the therapy and thereafter every 6 months; they were also assessed whenever they had symptoms indicating progression. Possible cardiovascular complications included myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 2 years there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in progression-free time; 65 of 217 (30%) patients in group 1 showed evidence of progression, including seven (3%) who died from prostate cancer. In group 2, 64 of 227 (28%) patients showed progression and eight (3.5%) died from prostatic cancer. There were 10 (5%) cardiovascular complications in patients in group 1, including five (2%) cardiovascular deaths; in group 2 there were 24 (11%) and 14 (6%), respectively. During the first year of treatment there were three (1.4%) cardiovascular complications in group 1 and 14 (6%) in group 2 (P < 0.05), and during the second year, seven (4%) and 10 (6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Parenteral PEP (240 mg/month) seems to be as efficient as orchidectomy in inhibiting disease in patients with advanced prostatic cancer (T3-4 M0 and T1-4 M1). There were more cardiovascular complications in patients treated with PEP than after orchidectomy; the difference was statistically significant during the first year of treatment.

Prostate tumour markers and differentiation grade in prostatic cancer.

Serum acid phosphatase activity, prostate specific phosphatase and prostate specific antigen were measured in 100 patients with prostatic cancer. The patients were divided according to the differentiation grade into 3 groups: G1 (well), G2 (moderately) and G3 (poorly differentiated) carcinoma. Bone metastases were identified by scintigraphy. Among the 76 M0 patients the mean levels of all 3 markers were slightly higher in patients with moderately differentiated prostatic carcinoma. Among the 24 M1 patients the primary tumour was either G2 (18 patients) or G3 (6 patients); none had G1 lesions. Significantly higher serum ACP and PAP levels were found in patients with G2 tumours than in those with G3 lesions. It was concluded that the histological differentiation grade of prostatic carcinoma did affect serum levels of prostatic tumour markers; the tendency towards higher levels in the G2 group was noticeable in both non-metastatic and metastatic cases despite the limited number of patients in the latter category. In clinical practice this information may be an important additional tool in staging prostatic cancer.

Prostate tumour markers as an aid in the staging of prostatic cancer.

Serum acid phosphatase activity (ACP), prostate specific phosphatase (PAP) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were measured in 100 patients with prostatic cancer. The patients were divided into 4 groups: T1-2 MO, T3-4 MO and M1 patients with less than or equal to 10 or greater than 10 metastatic foci in bone scintigraphy. The mean serum ACP levels were almost identical in the T1-2 MO and T3-4 MO groups and there was no significant difference between the mean PAP values. Significantly higher PSA levels were observed in the MO patients in the extracapsular category compared with those in the intracapsular category. The mean serum levels of all 3 tumour markers were significantly higher in the M1 than in the MO category. PSA seems to be the marker of choice as a diagnostic aid for differentiating between patients with intracapsular and those with extracapsular tumour growth. In prostatic cancer patients with bone metastases these markers were of similar value for staging the disease.

Pyelo-intestino-cutaneous conduit in the treatment of renal carcinoma of solitary kidneys.

A pyelo-intestino-cutaneous conduit, either by colonic or ileal segment, was used successfully in 4 patients with urothelial carcinoma affecting a solitary kidney. Primary healing was good but involved the risk of stricture formation. During the follow-up period (10-48 months), repeated endoscopic check-ups were easily performed through the conduit, enabling coagulation of recurrent tumour growth. Two patients are still alive and well; 2 are dead.

High dose polyoestradiol phosphate with and without acetosalicylic acid versus orchiectomy in the treatment of prostatic cancer. Finnprostate Group.

The clinical efficacy of high dose (160 mg) polyoestradiol phosphate (PEP) was compared with that of orchiectomy in a prospective randomised multicentre study including 200 prostatic cancer patients. The effect of daily low dose (75 mg) acetosalicylic acid (ASA) on possible cardiovascular complications during the first 6 months of therapy was also evaluated. Oestrogen-treated patients had more progressions, but follow-up was too short to draw any definite conclusions on the efficacy of treatment. There was no cardiovascular mortality and there were no thromboembolic complications in any treatment group. It was concluded that parenteral high dose PEP is not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications and there is no need for daily low dose ASA.