Emojis and Emoticons in Health Care and Dermatology Communication: Narrative Review.

Background: Emoticons and emojis have become staple additions to modern-day communication. These graphical icons are now embedded in daily society through the various forms of popular social media and through users' personal electronic conversations. With ever-increasing use and inclusivity, exploration of the possible health care and dermatology applications of these tools is imperative. Objective: The goal of this narrative review was to provide and evaluate an up-to-date literature survey examining the utility of emoticons and emojis in medicine. Special attention was paid to their existing and potential uses in the field of dermatology, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A PubMed search of peer-reviewed publications was performed in mid-2021 to collect articles with emoticon or emoji keywords in combination with other health care-relevant or dermatology-relevant keywords. Screening of publications and described studies was performed by the authors with education and research experience in health care, dermatology, social media, and electronic communication trends. Selected articles were grouped based on common subjects for qualitative analysis and presentation for in-depth discussion. Results: From this extensive search, researchers were able to identify a wide variety of publications detailing the use of emoticons and emojis in general health care, pediatric health care, public health, and dermatology. Key subject areas that emerged from the investigation included the ability of emoticons and emojis to improve communication within pediatric health care, enhance mood and psychological assessment or mental health screening in adults, develop interventions to improve patient medication adherence, complement novel means of public health and COVID-19 surveillance, and bolster dermatology-specific applications. Conclusions: This review illuminated the repurposing of emojis and emoticons for a myriad of advantageous functions in health care and public health, with applications studied in many populations and situations. Dermatology-specific uses were relatively sparse in the literature, highlighting potential opportunities for growth in future studies and practices. The importance of diversity and inclusivity has extended to emojis, with the recent introduction of skin color customization and new emojis better representing the comprehensive spectrum of users' experiences. A continuously evolving and technology-driven population creates a unique niche for emoticons and emojis to ease worldwide communication and understanding, transcending the barriers of age, language, and background. We encourage future studies and innovations to better understand and expand their utility.

Direct-to-Consumer Teledermatology Growth: A Review and Outlook for the Future.

The direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine industry, including teledermatology, has seen rapid expansion in recent years, partly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The shortage of dermatologists and the visual nature of dermatologic conditions attracted DTC companies to dermatology. As more patients continue to seek medical consultations and prescription medications from these for-profit companies, we must approach their growth with healthy skepticism. Shortcomings of DTC teledermatology include concerns about conflicts of interest (COIs), overdiagnosis, and overprescribing. Although DTC teledermatology is certainly here to stay, an appropriate understanding of this industry will allow dermatologists to advise patients and advocate for best practices.

Patient willingness to receive full-body skin exams based on the sex and/or gender and training level of provider: a survey study.

Full-body skin examinations (FBSEs) involve examination of the patient's skin from head to toe, and may be uncomfortable for some patients. While many patients prefer same-sex providers for pelvic, genital and rectal exams, desire for same-sex providers for FBSEs is not well characterized. This may be further magnified when FBSE is performed by medical trainees. We surveyed 566 subjects using Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT), an online crowdsourcing platform, to assess the public's willingness to receive FBSEs based on the sex and/or gender and the level of training of the healthcare provider (HCP). The overall willingness by all respondents to undergo FBSE performed by a dermatologist, dermatology resident and medical student was 84.3%, 77.5% and 65.7%, respectively, if the HCP was the same sex/gender, compared with 60.6%, 54.8% and 45.7% if the HCP was a different sex/gender (P < 0.001). In our cohort, unwillingness for FBSEs was greater if the patient was female, if the HCP was a different gender/sex from the patient and if the HCP was a medical student.

Extrafacial Merkel Cell Carcinoma Presenting as a Cyst.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin tumor that presents as an erythematous or violaceous nodule in elderly white males with an extensive history of sun exposure. Herein, we report two cases of extrafacial MCC. On exam, lesions presented as a cystic nodule and a firm plaque. We summarize tools from literature review that may aid in earlier diagnosis of MCC as well as implications of primary tumor location in prognosis. In addition, we provide an algorithm for diagnostic workup. MCC is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and a high risk of local recurrence and nodal metastasis. It is imperative to include MCC in differential diagnosis of cyst/nodule in order to facilitate early detection. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(3):304-308. doi:10.36849/JDD.6248.

The presence of accountability in digital interventions targeting non-adherence: A review.

OBJECTIVES: Provider-centered accountability, defined as the anticipation of a social interaction between a patient and their provider, increases patients' adherence to prescribed treatment. Digital adherence interventions based on accountability may be especially effective at promoting adherence. The current study aimed to assess whether publications on digital adherence interventions discuss accountability, include intervention components related to accountability, and measure feelings of patient accountability as an outcome. METHODS: PubMed was queried between January 2010 and March 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials incorporating digital adherence interventions. Full-text articles were assessed for participant demographics, interventions utilized, outcomes, and intervention effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 131 publications met inclusion criteria. Only four publications discussed accountability as a potential factor influencing patient adherence. Although 11% of publications included an intervention with direct accountability, only one did so by design. None of the included studies assessed feelings of accountability as an outcome. CONCLUSIONS: While provider-centered accountability has the potential to boost the efficacy of digital adherence interventions, accountability is rarely incorporated in studies of such interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Additional investigation into the influence of accountability on adherence interventions will allow for the development of these interventions as effective tools applicable to the full range of patients.

Accountability in reminder-based adherence interventions: A review.

OBJECTIVE: Interventions to elicit accountability capitalize on social behaviors to improve adherence but are distinct from reminders. However, little is known about the impact of accountability in reminder-based adherence interventions. Through a literature review, we aim to identify the frequency and effectiveness of accountability in reminder-based intervention studies. METHODS: PubMed and PsycArticles were searched for reminder-based adherence studies. Articles were categorized as reminder-only or reminder with accountability studies. Studies were characterized by outcome measures, and differences between control and intervention groups were compared for studies that used electronic monitoring devices. RESULTS: 165 studies met the inclusion criteria; 154 used reminders without accountability (93%). 79 of the 154 reminder-only studies (51%) improved adherence in intervention groups compared to controls. Eleven of the 165 studies (6.6%) included an accountability aspect. The intervention group had better adherence than controls in 10 out of the 11 reminder with accountability studies (91%). CONCLUSIONS: Although distinct from reminders, accountability can be incorporated in reminder-based interventions. However, it is not commonly included in reminder-based interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is important to consider accountability's effects on encouraging patient medication adherence. The addition of accountability interventions may further boost adherence, but few studies currently incorporate these types of interventions.

Unexpected Complications: A Case of Rosacea Fulminans in Pregnancy.

Rosacea fulminans (RF) is a rare facial dermatosis that typically affects women with a fulminating course that presents with superficial and deep-seated papules, pustules, and nodules, as well as an intense reddish or cyanotic erythema localized to the face. Although the etiology of RF remains unknown, immunologic, hormonal, and vascular factors have been implicated. We describe a case of a 32-year-old pregnant woman presenting with RF. Presentation in a pregnant patient is not commonly reported and requires special consideration to manage.

How the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey has been used to identify health disparities in the care of patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparities negatively impact patient health outcomes; addressing disparities could improve quality of life and decrease overall healthcare cost. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) is an objective and reliable source for collecting information on United States (U.S.) ambulatory medical care service visits and may be a useful tool for identifying potential disparities in care. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this literature review is to describe studies utilizing NAMCS to capture U.S. healthcare disparities. METHODS: PubMed was searched for scientific articles that utilized NAMCS to determine health disparities in the U.S. The keywords queried included "NAMCS" or "National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey" and "disparity" or "disparities" as a pair or additionally paired with one of the following: "race", "ethnicity", "age", "gender", "geography", or "insurance". RESULTS: 66 studies were found that incorporated NAMCS data from 1980-2016 into their methods to measure outcomes relating to health disparities. Disparities were found in the following categories: race/ethnicity, geographic location, age, insurance type, gender, specialist care versus primary care, body habitus, and preexisting conditions affecting patient outcomes. Disparities were identified in pain management, neurology, dermatology, psychiatry, patient communication access, and non-specialty specific or primary care visits related to disease conditions, screening, and treatment plans. LIMITATIONS: Only PubMed was utilized as a search engine and may not encompass all studies on NAMCS and health disparities. NAMCS is a cross-sectional database and does not allow for longitudinal analyses. CONCLUSIONS: NAMCS may be an underused tool given the limited number of articles that identify health disparities using it. Research studies utilizing NAMCS may identify potential disparities ultimately leading to better healthcare outcomes.