Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy.

Background: We aimed to investigate the predictive value of a systematic serum inflammation index, pan-immune-inflammatory value (PIV), in pathological complete response (pCR) of patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy to further promote ideal patients' selection. Methods: The clinicopathological and baseline laboratory information of 128 NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between October 2019 and April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm to screen candidate serum biomarkers for predicting pCR, which further entered the multivariate logistic regression model to determine final biomarkers. Accordingly, a diagnostic model for predicting individual pCR was established. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to estimate curves of disease-free survival (DFS), and the Log rank test was analyzed to compare DFS differences between patients with and without pCR. Results: Patients with NSCLC heterogeneously responded to neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and those with pCR had a significant longer DFS than patients without pCR. Through LASSO and the multivariate logistic regression model, PIV was identified as a predictor for predicting pCR of patients. Subsequently, a diagnostic model integrating with PIV, differentiated degree and histological type was constructed to predict pCR, which presented a satisfactory predictive power (AUC, 0.736), significant agreement between actual and our nomogram-predicted pathological response. Conclusion: Baseline PIV was an independent predictor of pCR for NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. A significantly longer DFS was achieved in patients with pCR rather than those without pCR; thus, the PIV-based diagnostic model might serve as a practical tool to identify ideal patients for neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic guidance.

Integrative Analysis of Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Algorithms Identifies a Novel Diagnostic Model Based on Costimulatory Molecule for Predicting Immune Microenvironment Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Costimulatory molecules are an indispensable signal for activating immune cells. However, the features of many costimulatory molecule genes (CMGs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are poorly understood. This study systematically explored expression patterns of CMGs in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) status of patients with LUAD. Their expression profiles were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Gene Expression Omnibus databases. Two robust TIME subtypes ("hot" and "cold") were classified by K-means clustering and estimation of stromal and immune cells in malignant tumor tissues using expression data. The "hot" subtype presented higher infiltration in activated immune cells and enrichments in the immune cell receptor signaling pathway and adaptive immune response. Three CMGs (CD80, LTB, and TNFSF8) were screened as final diagnostic markers by means of Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination algorithms. Accordingly, the diagnostic nomogram for predicting individualized TIME status showed satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in The Cancer Genome Atlas training cohort as well as GSE31210 and GSE180347 validation cohorts. Immunohistochemistry staining of 16 specimens revealed an apparently positive correlation between the expression of CMG biomarkers and pathologic response to immunotherapy. Thus, this diagnostic nomogram provided individualized predictions in TIME status of LUAD patients with good predictive accuracy, which could serve as a potential tool for identifying ideal candidates for immunotherapy.

An Aging-Related Gene Signature-Based Model for Risk Stratification and Prognosis Prediction in Lung Squamous Carcinoma.

Aging is an inevitable process characterized by a decline in many physiological activities, and has been known as a significant risk factor for many kinds of malignancies, but there are few studies about aging-related genes (ARGs) in lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC). We designed this study to explore the prognostic value of ARGs and establish an ARG-based prognosis signature for LUSC patients. RNA-sequencing and corresponding clinicopathological data of patients with LUSC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The ARG risk signature was developed on the basis of results of LASSO and multivariate Cox analysis in the TCGA training dataset (n = 492). Furthermore, the GSE73403 dataset (n = 69) validated the prognostic performance of this ARG signature. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to verify the expression of the ARGs in the signature. A five ARG-based signature, including A2M, CHEK2, ELN, FOS, and PLAU, was constructed in the TCGA dataset, and stratified patients into low- and high-risk groups with significantly different overall survival (OS) rates. The ARG risk score remained to be considered as an independent indicator of OS in the multivariate Cox regression model for LUSC patients. Then, a prognostic nomogram incorporating the ARG risk score with T-, N-, and M-classification was established. It achieved a good discriminative ability with a C-index of 0.628 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.586-0.671) in the TCGA cohort and 0.648 (95% CI: 0.535-0.762) in the GSE73403 dataset. Calibration curves displayed excellent agreement between the actual observations and the nomogram-predicted survival. The IHC staining discovered that these five ARGs were overexpression in LUSC tissues. Besides, the immune infiltration analysis in the TCGA cohort represented a distinctly differentiated infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells between the low- and high-risk groups. We identified a novel ARG-related prognostic signature, which may serve as a potential biomarker for individualized survival predictions and personalized therapeutic recommendation of anti-tumor immunity for patients with LUSC.

A Novel Inflammatory-Related Gene Signature Based Model for Risk Stratification and Prognosis Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Inflammation is an important hallmark of cancer and plays a role in both neogenesis and tumor development. Despite this, inflammatory-related genes (IRGs) remain to be poorly studied in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We aim to explore the prognostic value of IRGs for LUAD and construct an IRG-based prognosis signature. The transcriptomic profiles and clinicopathological information of patients with LUAD were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis and multivariate Cox regression were applied in the TCGA set to generate an IRG risk signature. LUAD cases with from the GSE31210 and GSE30219 datasets were used to validate the predictive ability of the signature. Analysis of the TCGA cohort revealed a five-IRG risk signature consisting of EREG, GPC3, IL7R, LAMP3, and NMUR1. This signature was used to divide patients into two risk groups with different survival rates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis verified that the risk score from the five-IRG signature negatively correlated with patient outcome. A nomogram was developed using the IRG risk signature and stage, with C-index values of 0.687 (95% CI: 0.644-0.730) in the TCGA training cohort, 0.678 (95% CI: 0.586-0.771) in GSE30219 cohort, and 0.656 (95% CI: 0.571-0.740) in GSE30219 cohort. Calibration curves were consistent between the actual and the predicted overall survival. The immune infiltration analysis in the TCGA training cohort and two GEO validation cohorts showed a distinctly differentiated immune cell infiltration landscape between the two risk groups. The IRG risk signature for LUAD can be used to predict patient prognosis and guide individual treatment. This risk signature is also a potential biomarker of immunotherapy.

Surgical treatment to multiple primary lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: As there is no consensus on the optimal surgery strategy for multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC), we conducted this study to address this issue by comparing the prognosis of MPLC patients underwent different surgical strategies including sublobar resection and the standard resection through a systemic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant literature was obtained from three databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set for the screening of articles to be selected for further conduction of systemic review and meta-analysis. The HRs of OS of the sublobar group compared with standard resection group were extracted directly or calculated indirectly from included researches. RESULTS: Ten researches published from 2000 to 2017 were included in this study, with 468 and 445 MPLC cases for the standard resection group and sublobar resection group respectively. The result suggested that OS of MPLC patients underwent sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection for at least one lesion) was comparable with those underwent standard resection approach (lobectomy or pneumonectomy for all lesions), with HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.67-1.71, p = 0.784. Further analysis found no difference in subgroups of synchronous and metachronous (from second metachronous lesion), different population region and dominant sex type. CONCLUSIONS: This study may reveal that sublobar resection is acceptable for patients with MPLC at an early stage, because of the equivalent prognosis to the standard resection and better pulmonary function preservation. Further research is needed to validate these findings.