Agreement of a Novel Artificial Intelligence Software With Optical Coherence Tomography and Manual Grading of the Optic Disc in Glaucoma.

PRCIS: The offline artificial intelligence (AI) on a smartphone-based fundus camera shows good agreement and correlation with the vertical cup-to-disc ratio (vCDR) from the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and manual grading by experts. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the agreement of vCDR measured by a new AI software from optic disc images obtained using a validated smartphone-based imaging device, with SD-OCT vCDR measurements, and manual grading by experts on a stereoscopic fundus camera. METHODS: In a prospective, cross-sectional study, participants above 18 years (Glaucoma and normal) underwent a dilated fundus evaluation, followed by optic disc imaging including a 42-degree monoscopic disc-centered image (Remidio NM-FOP-10), a 30-degree stereoscopic disc-centered image (Kowa nonmyd WX-3D desktop fundus camera), and disc analysis (Cirrus SD-OCT). Remidio FOP images were analyzed for vCDR using the new AI software, and Kowa stereoscopic images were manually graded by 3 fellowship-trained glaucoma specialists. RESULTS: We included 473 eyes of 244 participants. The vCDR values from the new AI software showed strong agreement with SD-OCT measurements [95% limits of agreement (LoA)=-0.13 to 0.16]. The agreement with SD-OCT was marginally better in eyes with higher vCDR (95% LoA=-0.15 to 0.12 for vCDR>0.8). Interclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.91). The vCDR values from AI software showed a good correlation with the manual segmentation by experts (interclass correlation coefficient=0.89, 95% CI, 0.87-0.91) on stereoscopic images (95% LoA=-0.18 to 0.11) with agreement better for eyes with vCDR>0.8 (LoA=-0.12 to 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The new AI software vCDR measurements had an excellent agreement and correlation with the SD-OCT and manual grading. The ability of the Medios AI to work offline, without requiring cloud-based inferencing, is an added advantage.

Two-Year Outcomes of the New Low-cost Nonvalved Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant in Refractory Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the 2-year surgical outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety of the relatively new, indigenously manufactured, low-cost nonvalved drainage device Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) in the management of refractory glaucomas in the Indian population. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients older than 12 years, who underwent nonvalved glaucoma drainage device surgery via AADI, was performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon, between January 2014 and January 2018, who had at least 12 months of documented postoperative follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary-intraocular pressure (IOP).Secondary-number of antiglaucoma medication (AGM), LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity and complications.Complete success was defined as IOP ≥5 and ≤21 mm Hg; qualified success was defined as fulfilling the above criteria with the use of AGM. Failure was defined as the inability to fulfill the IOP criteria, loss of perception of light, explantation, or any additional glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: A total of 48 eyes of 46 patients were included with a median follow-up of 24 months (quartile 1=16, quartile 3=31.25; interquartile range=15.25) (mean=24.9 mo; SD=10.1). The IOP and number of AGM required was significantly lower at every timepoint postoperatively (P<0.001). The median LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity remained unchanged (P=0.307). Complications occurred in 21 patients (43.7%); some eyes had >1 complication. Complete success was seen in 56.3%; overall success was 87.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of the new nonvalved glaucoma drainage device, AADI, remain in its second year after implantation. Still further follow-up is recommended, as it has the ability to breach the cost barrier in newly industrialized nations worldwide.

Combined cataract extraction with a new nonvalved glaucoma drainage device in adult eyes with cataract and refractory glaucoma.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to report the outcomes of simultaneous cataract extraction (CE) and a new nonvalved glaucoma drainage device (GDD), Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI), in eyes with cataract and refractory glaucoma. Methods: This was a non-comparative, interventional, retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent AADI together with phacoemulsification from June-2015 to January-2017 by a single fellowship trained glaucoma surgeon with documented 3-months of follow-up were included. The main outcomes were intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medication (AGM), visual acuity, and complications. Results: We included 19 eyes of 17 patients with average follow-up of 14.4 ± 8.4 months. IOP and AGM reduced from 36.9 ± 11.1 mmHg and 4 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 12 ± 4.5 mmHg and 0.8 ± 1.2, respectively (P < 0.001). Complications were seen in seven eyes (36.8%). Total success was seen in 17 eyes (89.5%). None of the patients lost vision. Conclusion: Combining cataract extraction with the new non-valved Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant, appears to be an effective and safe technique in eyes with refractory glaucoma and cataract. Larger studies and further follow-up is recommended for such patients.

Surgical outcomes of a new affordable non-valved glaucoma drainage device and Ahmed glaucoma valve: comparison in the first year.

BACKGROUND: A new low-cost, indigenously manufactured, non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) has been introduced and its design is based on the Baerveldt Glaucoma Device. We aim to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of this GDD (Aurolab aqueous drainage implant, AADI) vis-à-vis the valved device, Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV), in the management of refractory glaucomas. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional. PARTICIPANTS: Case review of consecutive patients who underwent GDD surgery by a single fellowship-trained surgeon at a Tertiary Centre between January 2014 and November 2016. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Intraocular pressure (IOP). SECONDARY: Antiglaucoma medication (AGM), LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications. RESULTS: A total of 88 eyes of 83 patients were included; 36 eyes received AGV and 52 AADI. Preoperative parameters were similar between groups. Median follow-up was 13 and 12 months for AADI and AGV, respectively. Overall success rate was higher in AADI (92.3%) vs AGV (80.5%) (p<0.001). The median IOP in mm Hg (Quartiles; IQR) (AADI 14 (10,15;5) vs AGV 16 (14,20;6)) and AGM (AADI: 0 (0,1;1) vs AGV 2 (1,2.75;1.75)) was significantly lower in the AADI group at last follow-up (p<0.001). LogMAR BCVA improved in both groups; complication rates (AADI 44.2% vs AGV 52.7%) were comparable (p=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures were effective in reduction of IOP and need for AGM. Nevertheless, overall success rate was higher in the AADI group and IOP and number of AGM required was significantly lower in the AADI group; this affordable GDD could have a tremendous impact in the management of refractory glaucomas in low-income to middle-income countries.

Surgical Outcomes of a New Low-Cost Nonvalved Glaucoma Drainage Device in Refractory Glaucoma: Results at 1 Year.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the early outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety of a new, indigenously manufactured, low-cost nonvalved drainage device [AADI (Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant)] in the management of refractory glaucoma in the Indian population. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive patients older than 12 years, who underwent glaucoma drainage device surgery (GDD) using AADI, by a single fellowship-trained surgeon, between January 2014 and December 2016, who had at least 3 months of documented post-op follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary-intraocular pressure (IOP).Secondary-number of antiglaucoma medication (AGM), LogMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications.Complete success was defined as IOP ≥5 mm Hg and ≤21 mm Hg or reduction of IOP by ≥20% from baseline without AGM; qualified success with use of AGM. Failure was defined as inability to meet IOP criteria, loss of perception of light, explantation or any additional glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: A total of 54 eyes of 51 patients were included. Mean follow up was 12.1±6.3 months. The IOP and number of AGM required was significantly lower at every visit postoperatively (P<0.001). Median LogMAR BCVA remained unchanged (P=0.5). Complications occurred in 22 patients (40.7%). Complete success was seen in 66.6%; overall success was 92.6%. CONCLUSIONS: New nonvalved GDD (AADI) surgery is effective in reducing IOP and need for AGM with a safety profile similar to published reports of prevailing GDDs. It thus has the ability to breach the cost barrier in low-to-middle income countries; further follow-up is required to determine sustainability over time.

Outcomes of lensectomy and risk factors for failure in spherophakic eyes with secondary glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of lensectomy in spherophakic eyes with subluxated or dislocated crystalline lenses and secondary glaucoma. METHODS: Lensectomy was performed in 52 eyes, 36 eyes with lens subluxation and 16 eyes with lens dislocation with secondary glaucoma from 1991 to 2016. Glaucoma was diagnosed based on intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥22 mm Hg and/or glaucomatous optic disc damage. Complete success was defined as IOP ≥5 and ≤21 mm Hg without antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) or surgery, and eyes needing oral AGM or surgical intervention for IOP control or those with complication causing loss of light perception were considered failure. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age at lensectomy was 12 (6-18) years, and median spherical equivalent was -14.5D (-23.7to -13). Median follow-up was 30.6 (5.4-103.4) months. Median logMAR (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) visual acuity improved from 0.95 (0.6-1.8) to 0.4 (0.2-1.3) after lensectomy (p=0.01). Median IOP decreased from 22 mm Hg (17-31) to 14 mm Hg (11-19) at final follow-up (p=0.01). Median number of AGM decreased from 2 (2-3) to 1 (0-2) at final follow-up (p<0.0001), and glaucoma surgery was needed in four eyes (7.7% eyes). Complete success probability was 69% at 1 year and 51% at 5 years. Younger age (<6 years), higher presenting IOP (>32 mm Hg) and larger cup to disc ratio at presentation were found to be significant risk factors for failure. CONCLUSION: Lensectomy was effective in controlling IOP in close to half of all eyes with spherophakia and secondary glaucoma, 40% eyes needed AGM and only 7.7% eyes needed glaucoma surgery for IOP control. In this cohort, younger age, higher IOP and larger cup to disc ratio at presentation were risk factors for poor glaucoma control after lensectomy.