The Clinical Effects of Abdominal Binder on Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

Objective. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the effects of abdominal binder in abdominal surgeries. Methods. Through literature retrieval in globally recognized databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central), trials investigating the application of abdominal binder in abdominal surgeries were systematically reviewed. The main outcomes, namely, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and symptom distress scale (SDS) score, were pooled to make an overall estimation. I2 index was calculated to identify heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the stability of main results and explore the source of heterogeneity. A funnel plot and Egger's test were applied to assess publication bias. Results. Ten randomized controlled trials consisting of 968 subjects were ultimately included for the pooled estimation. Abdominal binder significantly increased the distance of 6MWT with standard mean difference (SMD) of .555 (P < .001) and decreased the scores of VAS and SDS with SMD of -.979 (P < .001) and -.716 (P < .001), respectively. Despite of the significant heterogeneity indicated by I2 index statistic, the results of sensitivity analysis revealed the reliability of the main conclusions. While we identified no obvious publication bias regarding 6MWT (Egger's test P = .321), it seemed that significant publication biases existed with respect to the estimation of VAS (P < .001) and SDS (P = .006). Conclusion. The current meta-analysis verified that abdominal binder efficiently promoted recovery after abdominal surgeries in terms of facilitating mobilization, alleviating pain, and reducing postoperative distress. More rigorously designed clinical trials with large sample size are expected to further elaborate its clinical value.

Dexamethasone prevents TACE-induced adverse events: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: While dexamethasone has been applied following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for years, its clinical effects have not been determined. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone in preventing adverse events induced by TACE. METHODS: Literature retrieval was conducted using globally recognized online databases, namely MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dexamethasone application in patients undergoing TACE. The relative odds ratios (ORs) of incidence rates of three adverse events, namely, fever, abdominal pain and nausea/vomiting, were calculated. The value of I was applied to evaluate the heterogeneity of the trials, and the overall publication bias was assessed with Egger test. RESULTS: Four RCTs containing 350 subjects were included for the pooled estimation. Dexamethasone significantly reduced the incidence rate of TACE-induced adverse events (OR = 1.237, 95% CI: 1.170-1.308, P < .001) with moderate heterogeneity (I = 46.0%). The result of Egger test revealed a publication bias for the included studies. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of dexamethasone in preventing TACE-induced adverse events. To confirm the practicality of dexamethasone use with TACE, further studies with large sample sizes are warranted to update the evidence-based analyses.

Evaluation of different surgical dressings in reducing postoperative surgical site infection of a closed wound: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of different surgical dressings in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) and identify the optimal dressings. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials investigating the application of surgical dressings were retrieved from electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The odds ratios (ORs) of the SSI rate were compared by direct meta-analysis, and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values were calculated based on the Bayesian theorem. A node-splitting model was applied to analyse the consistency of the comprehensive comparison results. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies containing 5487 participants were pooled for the comprehensive comparison. Among all the studies included, 9 types of surgical dressings were identified for comparison. The results of the direct meta-analysis revealed that novel dressings significantly reduced the overall SSI rate with an OR of 1.026 (95% CI: 1.013-1.040, p < 0.001), which was determined to have low heterogeneity (I2 = 32.1%). Specifically, 3 types of dressings presented significant effects in reducing SSI, namely, mupirocin-containing (OR = 1.076, 95% CI: 1.014-1.142, p = 0.015), dialkylcarbamoyl-chloride-containing (OR = 1.047, 95% CI: 1.012-1.083, p = 0.008) and vitamin E (VE)-silicone-containing (OR = 1.129, 95% CI: 1.016-1.255, p = 0.025) dressings. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that the VE-silicone dressing (SUCRA = 0.37) was the optimal dressing, followed by the mupirocin dressing, with a SUCRA of 0.31. CONCLUSION: The present network meta-analysis identified the superiority of VE-silicone and mupirocin dressings in preventing SSI. The evidence-based results provide suggestions and directions for future investigations on surgical dressings. More large-scale trials with rigorous designs are warranted to clarify the clinical value of novel dressings in surgical incision management.

Identifying the superior antibiotic prophylaxis strategy for breast surgery: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical roles of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies for breast surgery remains large unknowns. The aim of this study is to evaluate different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies based on a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We initially retrieved literature from globally recognized databases, namely, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central, to address relative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the antibiotic prophylaxis strategies for breast surgery. Relative postoperative infection rates were quantitatively pooled and estimated based on the Bayesian theorem. Values of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities were calculated and ranked. Additional pairwise meta-analyses were performed to validate differences between the respective strategies at the statistical level for further explanations. RESULTS: After a detailed review, a total of 14 RCTs containing 6 different strategies were included for the network meta-analysis. The results indicated that the application of antibiotics administered during pre- plus post- plus intraoperative periods possessed the highest possibility of having the best clinical effects (SUCRA, 0.40), followed by intraoperative administration alone (SUCRA, 0.35) and pre- plus intraoperative administrations (SUCRA, 0.20). Moreover, an additional pairwise meta-analysis determined that pre- and intraoperative-related strategies significantly reduced postoperative infections at a statistical level. CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, we concluded that application of antibiotics administered during pre- plus post- plus intraoperative periods seemed to reveal superior benefits. However, the essential roles of pure intraoperative and postoperative application were still need to be further validated.

Systematic review of preservation solutions for allografts for liver transplantation based on a network meta-analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this work was to determine the best preservation solutions for allografts for liver transplantation by quantitative network meta-analysis. METHODS: Global electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. Seven pieces of parametric data were extracted from included studies for pooled estimation. A consistency model was used for direct and indirect comparisons. The cumulative probability P value was utilized to rank the solutions. A node-splitting model was utilized for testing the consistency of final data. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. RESULTS: Eleven 2-arm trials including 1319 patients and 5 different solutions were finally included. HTK (Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) solution exhibited the best efficacy for decreasing the primary dysfunction rate, biliary complications and ICU-stay time (probability P = 0.43, 0.45 and 0.58, respectively). Celsior solution significantly decreased the rate of rejection and early retransplantation (probability P = 0.73 and 0.38, respectively), and enhanced patient and graft survival (probability P = 0.90 and 0.98, respectively) more than did other solutions. Overall, the quality of evidence was rated high or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that HTK solution may offer the best safety during the perioperative period. However, Celsior solution led to better graft tolerance and exhibited greater benefit for long-term outcomes. And our conclusions still need to be further validated.