Cellular senescence in aging: Molecular basis, implications and therapeutic interventions.

Cellular senescence is an irreversible proliferation arrest in response to cellular damage and stress. Although cellular senescence is a highly stable cell cycle arrest, it can influence many physiological, pathological, and aging processes. Cellular senescence can be triggered by various intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, genotoxic stress, oncogenic activation, irradiation and chemotherapeutic agents. Senescence is associated with several molecular and phenotypic alterations, such as senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), cell cycle arrest, DNA damage response (DDR), senescence-associated ß-galactosidase, morphogenesis, and chromatin remodeling. Cellular senescence is a regular physiological event involved in tissue homeostasis, embryonic development, tissue remodeling, wound healing, and inhibition of tumor progression. Mitochondria are one of the organelles that undergo significant morphological and metabolic changes associated with senescence. Recent evidence unraveled that inter-organelle communication regulates cellular senescence, where mitochondria form a highly complex and dynamic network throughout the cytoplasm with other organelles, like the endoplasmic reticulum. An imbalance in organelle interactions may result in faulty cellular homeostasis, which contributes to cellular senescence and is associated with organ aging. Since mitochondrial dysfunction is a common characteristic of cellular senescence and age-related diseases, mitochondria-targeted senolytic or redox modulator senomorphic strategies help solve the complex problems with the detrimental consequences of cellular senescence. Understanding the regulation of mitochondrial metabolism would provide knowledge on effective therapeutic interventions for aging and age-related pathologies. This chapter focuses on the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of senescence and targeting senescence as a potential strategy to alleviate age-related pathologies and support healthy aging.

Loss of tRNA methyltransferase 9 and DNA damage response genes in yeast confers sensitivity to aminoglycosides.

tRNA methyltransferase 9 (Trm9)-catalysed tRNA modifications have been shown to translationally enhance the DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae trm9Δ, distinct DNA repair and spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) mutants are differentially sensitive to the aminoglycosides tobramycin, gentamicin and amikacin, indicating DDR and SAC activation might rely on translation fidelity, under aminoglycoside stress. Further, we report that the DNA damage induced by aminoglycosides in the base excision repair mutants ogg1Δ and apn1Δ is mediated by reactive oxygen species, which induce the DNA adduct 8-hydroxy deoxyguanosine. Finally, the synergistic effect of tobramycin and the DNA-damaging agent bleomycin to sensitize trm9Δ and the DDR mutants mlh1Δ, rad51Δ, mre11Δ and sgs1Δ at significantly lower concentrations compared with wild-type suggests that cells with tRNA modification dysregulation and DNA repair gene defects can be selectively sensitized using a combination of translation inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents.

Distinct regulatory role for RFL, the rice LFY homolog, in determining flowering time and plant architecture.

Activity of axillary meristems dictates the architecture of both vegetative and reproductive parts of a plant. In Arabidopsis thaliana, a model eudicot species, the transcription factor LFY confers a floral fate to new meristems arising from the periphery of the reproductive shoot apex. Diverse orthologous LFY genes regulate vegetative-to-reproductive phase transition when expressed in Arabidopsis, a property not shared by RFL, the homolog in the agronomically important grass, rice. We have characterized RFL by knockdown of its expression and by its ectopic overexpression in transgenic rice. We find that reduction in RFL expression causes a dramatic delay in transition to flowering, with the extreme phenotype being no flowering. Conversely, RFL overexpression triggers precocious flowering. In these transgenics, the expression levels of known flowering time genes reveal RFL as a regulator of OsSOC1 (OsMADS50), an activator of flowering. Aside from facilitating a transition of the main growth axis to an inflorescence meristem, RFL expression status affects vegetative axillary meristems and therefore regulates tillering. The unique spatially and temporally regulated RFL expression during the development of vegetative axillary bud (tiller) primordia and inflorescence branch primordia is therefore required to produce tillers and panicle branches, respectively. Our data provide mechanistic insights into a unique role for RFL in determining the typical rice plant architecture by regulating distinct downstream pathways. These results offer a means to alter rice flowering time and plant architecture by manipulating RFL-mediated pathways.

The making of a bushy grass with a branched flowering stem: Key rice plant architecture traits regulated by RFL the rice LFY homolog.

In Arabidopsis thaliana, a eudicot species, the transcription factor LFY is expressed throughout the floral meristem and promotes their formation. The expression pattern of the rice LFY homolog-RFL shows distinct differences from that of its Arabidopsis counterpart. In the March issue of PNAS (2008) we have shown the temporally-regulated high-level expression of RFL in the apical meristem is necessary for its transition to an inflorescence meristem and thus to initiate flowering. RFL controls the time taken for flowering, by activating integrators of flowering signals such as OsSOC1 and RFT1. Further, the dynamic pattern of RFL expression in the branching inflorescence meristem (panicle) and in vegetative axillary meristems (tiller buds) is required for panicle branching and tiller outgrowth. Thus RFL functions determine the architecture of the rice plant. Here we propose a plausible model for a regulatory feedback loop between RFL and OsSOC1/RFT1 in controlling the vegetative to flowering phase transition. We discuss the possibility that non-cell autonomous RFL functions may also regulate signaling the net outcome of which determines the rice plant body plan.