Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Blood ; 123(11): 1729-38, 2014 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24449215

ABSTRACT

RUNX1/CBFß (core binding factor [CBF]) is a heterodimeric transcription factor complex that is frequently involved in chromosomal translocations, point mutations, or deletions in acute leukemia. The mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene is also frequently involved in chromosomal translocations or partial tandem duplication in acute leukemia. The MLL protein interacts with RUNX1 and prevents RUNX1 from ubiquitin-mediated degradation. RUNX1/CBFß recruits MLL to regulate downstream target genes. However, the functional consequence of MLL fusions on RUNX1/CBFß activity has not been fully understood. In this report, we show that MLL fusion proteins and the N-terminal MLL portion of MLL fusions downregulate RUNX1 and CBFß protein expression via the MLL CXXC domain and flanking regions. We confirmed this finding in Mll-Af9 knock-in mice and human M4/M5 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines, with or without MLL translocations, showing that MLL translocations cause a hypomorph phenotype of RUNX1/CBFß. Overexpression of RUNX1 inhibits the development of AML in Mll-Af9 knock-in mice; conversely, further reducing Runx1/Cbfß levels accelerates MLL-AF9-mediated AML in bone marrow transplantation assays. These data reveal a newly defined negative regulation of RUNX1/CBFß by MLL fusion proteins and suggest that targeting RUNX1/CBFß levels may be a potential therapy for MLLs.


Subject(s)
Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/metabolism , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/metabolism , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/metabolism , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/metabolism , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/physiology , Animals , Blotting, Western , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/genetics , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/genetics , Flow Cytometry , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Phenotype , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Translocation, Genetic
2.
J Clin Invest ; 123(9): 3876-88, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23979164

ABSTRACT

RUNX1 is generally considered a tumor suppressor in myeloid neoplasms. Inactivating RUNX1 mutations have frequently been found in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, no somatic RUNX1 alteration was found in AMLs with leukemogenic fusion proteins, such as core-binding factor (CBF) leukemia and MLL fusion leukemia, raising the possibility that RUNX1 could actually promote the growth of these leukemia cells. Using normal human cord blood cells and those expressing leukemogenic fusion proteins, we discovered a dual role of RUNX1 in myeloid leukemogenesis. RUNX1 overexpression inhibited the growth of normal cord blood cells by inducing myeloid differentiation, whereas a certain level of RUNX1 activity was required for the growth of AML1-ETO and MLL-AF9 cells. Using a mouse genetic model, we also showed that the combined loss of Runx1/Cbfb inhibited leukemia development induced by MLL-AF9. RUNX2 could compensate for the loss of RUNX1. The survival effect of RUNX1 was mediated by BCL2 in MLL fusion leukemia. Our study unveiled an unexpected prosurvival role for RUNX1 in myeloid leukemogenesis. Inhibiting RUNX1 activity rather than enhancing it could be a promising therapeutic strategy for AMLs with leukemogenic fusion proteins.


Subject(s)
Cell Survival , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/physiology , Animals , Apoptosis , Cell Cycle Checkpoints , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/metabolism , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/metabolism , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Mice , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Mice, Transgenic , Mutation, Missense , Myeloid Cells/metabolism , Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/metabolism , Neoplasm Transplantation , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism , RUNX1 Translocation Partner 1 Protein
3.
Blood ; 120(5): 1118-29, 2012 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22740449

ABSTRACT

One mechanism for disrupting the MLL gene in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is through partial tandem duplication (MLL-PTD); however, the mechanism by which MLL-PTD contributes to MDS and AML development and maintenance is currently unknown. Herein, we investigated hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) phenotypes of Mll-PTD knock-in mice. Although HSPCs (Lin(-)Sca1(+)Kit(+) (LSK)/SLAM(+) and LSK) in Mll(PTD/WT) mice are reduced in absolute number in steady state because of increased apoptosis, they have a proliferative advantage in colony replating assays, CFU-spleen assays, and competitive transplantation assays over wild-type HSPCs. The Mll(PTD/WT)-derived phenotypic short-term (ST)-HSCs/multipotent progenitors and granulocyte/macrophage progenitors have self-renewal capability, rescuing hematopoiesis by giving rise to long-term repopulating cells in recipient mice with an unexpected myeloid differentiation blockade and lymphoid-lineage bias. However, Mll(PTD/WT) HSPCs never develop leukemia in primary or recipient mice, suggesting that additional genetic and/or epigenetic defects are necessary for full leukemogenic transformation. Thus, the Mll-PTD aberrantly alters HSPCs, enhances self-renewal, causes lineage bias, and blocks myeloid differentiation. These findings provide a framework by which we can ascertain the underlying pathogenic role of MLL-PTD in the clonal evolution of human leukemia, which should facilitate improved therapies and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation , Hematopoiesis/physiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/physiology , Myeloid Cells/physiology , Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein/genetics , Stress, Physiological/physiology , Animals , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cell Lineage/physiology , Cells, Cultured , Clonal Evolution/genetics , Gene Duplication/physiology , Hematopoiesis/drug effects , Hematopoiesis/genetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/pathology , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Myeloid Cells/metabolism , Stress, Physiological/drug effects , Tandem Repeat Sequences/genetics
4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 77(4): 1223-31, 2010 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20610043

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Constitutively activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and ErbB2 are involved in the pathogenesis of many tumors, including astrocytoma. Inactivation of these molecules is reported to result in radiosensitization. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether inhibition of STAT3, ErbB2, or both could enhance radiotherapy in the human glioma model (U251 and U87 cell lines). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RNAi plasmids targeting STAT3 or ErbB2 were constructed, and their downregulatory effects on target proteins were examined by immunoblotting. After combination treatment of RNAi with or without irradiation, the cell viability was determined using 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and clonogenic assays. The in vivo effect of combined treatment was determined using the U251 xenograft model. The apoptosis caused by the inhibition of STAT3 and ErbB2 was detected, and the mechanism involved in the apoptosis was investigated, including increases in caspase proteins, mitochondrial damage, and the expression of key modulating protein of different apoptosis pathways. RESULTS: Transfection of U251 cells with STAT3 or ErbB2 siRNA plasmids specifically reduced their target gene expressions. Inhibition of STAT3 or ErbB2 greatly decreased glioma cell survival after 2, 4, or 6 Gy irradiation. Inhibition of STAT3 and ErbB2 also enhanced radiation-induced tumor growth inhibition in the U251 xenograft model. Furthermore, the suppression of either STAT3 or ErbB2 could induce U251 cell apoptosis, which was related primarily to the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that simultaneous inhibition of STAT3 and ErbB2 expression can promote potent antitumor activity and radiosensitizing activity in human glioma.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis , Glioma , Neoplasm Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Radiation Tolerance , Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors , STAT3 Transcription Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Astrocytes/cytology , Caspases/metabolism , Cell Line , Cell Survival/genetics , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Down-Regulation , Enzyme Activation , Glioma/genetics , Glioma/metabolism , Glioma/pathology , Glioma/radiotherapy , Mice , Mice, Nude , Mitochondria/physiology , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , STAT3 Transcription Factor/genetics , STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Transfection
5.
Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 24(9): 850-2, 2008 Sep.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18782513

ABSTRACT

AIM: To explore the effect of activating the murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 by both gamma-rays and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and to study the expression of calcium-binding protein S100A8 induced by gamma-rays and LPS. METHODS: The RAW264.7 cells were observed by phase contrast microscope. The cell cycle and the level of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs) were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). The production of NO was measured by colorimetric Griess reaction. The mRNA expression of S100A8 was recorded by real-time quantitative RT-PCR method. RESULTS: The exposure of RAW264.7 cells to gamma-rays and LPS resulted in the morphological change of cells, the rise of cells number of aneuploid and apoptosis, and the rise of the level of ROI, NO and S100A8 mRNA. The effect of using both gamma-rays and LPS was stronger than that of single gamma-rays or LPS treatment. CONCLUSION: The mechanism of using both gamma-rays and LPS for activating macrophages is owing to the various biological effects including the change of cell cycle, the change of the level of messenger molecules and the expression of inflammation factor such as S100A8. The expression of S100A8 gene is closely correlated with the function and state of macrophages.


Subject(s)
Lipopolysaccharides/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/radiation effects , Animals , Calgranulin A , Cell Line , Gamma Rays , Gene Expression/radiation effects , Macrophage Activation/radiation effects , Mice , S100 Proteins/genetics , S100 Proteins/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...