Outcomes for emergency department patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19: An analysis of the Australian experience in 2020 (COVED-5).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting to Australian EDs with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 during 2020, and to determine the predictors of in-hospital death for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. METHODS: This analysis from the COVED Project presents data from 12 sites across four Australian states for the period from 1 April to 30 November 2020. All adult patients who met local criteria for suspected COVID-19 and underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the ED were eligible for inclusion. Study outcomes were mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 24 405 eligible ED presentations over the whole study period, 423 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. During the 'second wave' from 1 July to 30 September 2020, 26 (6%) of 406 SARS-CoV-2 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation, compared to 175 (2%) of the 9024 SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-5.2, P < 0.001), and 41 (10%) SARS-CoV-2 positive patients died in hospital compared to 312 (3%) SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.2-4.4, P = 0.001). For SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, the strongest independent predictors of hospital death were age (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1-1.1, P < 0.001), higher triage category (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3-9.4, P = 0.012), obesity (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-14.3, P = 0.024) and receiving immunosuppressive treatment (OR 8.2; 95% CI 1.8-36.7, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: ED patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 had higher odds of mechanical ventilation and death in hospital. The strongest predictors of death were age, a higher triage category, obesity and receiving immunosuppressive treatment.

Characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples attending Australian emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients are overrepresented in Australian EDs. The present study aimed to assess their characteristics in utilising ED services at a national level. METHODS: This exploratory, quantitative study used 2016-2017 de-identified data from the National Non-admitted Patient Emergency Department Care Database to assess the proportions (with 95% confidence interval) of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians across various aspects of ED presentations, including mode of arrival, triage scale, diagnosis information, episode end status and ED length of stay. Episode level ED data were compared by Indigenous status and geographical remoteness of EDs. RESULTS: Of 7.4 million presentations, 6.58% were Indigenous presentations, with over two-thirds occurring in regional and remote EDs. Indigenous patients were more likely than non-Indigenous patients to arrive to EDs by ambulance and police/correctional services vehicle across all remoteness areas. Additionally, they were more likely to present with respiratory system illness, illness of the skin/subcutaneous tissue/breast and mental/behavioural disorders. Indigenous Australians were more likely to leave EDs before being seen or care complete (odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.71-1.74), and this was observed for patients classified across all levels of triage scale. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first national study looking at the characteristics of and reasons for presenting to Australian EDs for Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients. Our findings provide important insight into the potential factors affecting Indigenous patient care, and an impetus for ongoing research and advocacy work to improve the quality of emergency care provided to Indigenous Australians.