A resonant sextuplet of sub-Neptunes transiting the bright star HD 110067.

Planets with radii between that of the Earth and Neptune (hereafter referred to as 'sub-Neptunes') are found in close-in orbits around more than half of all Sun-like stars1,2. However, their composition, formation and evolution remain poorly understood3. The study of multiplanetary systems offers an opportunity to investigate the outcomes of planet formation and evolution while controlling for initial conditions and environment. Those in resonance (with their orbital periods related by a ratio of small integers) are particularly valuable because they imply a system architecture practically unchanged since its birth. Here we present the observations of six transiting planets around the bright nearby star HD 110067. We find that the planets follow a chain of resonant orbits. A dynamical study of the innermost planet triplet allowed the prediction and later confirmation of the orbits of the rest of the planets in the system. The six planets are found to be sub-Neptunes with radii ranging from 1.94R⊕ to 2.85R⊕. Three of the planets have measured masses, yielding low bulk densities that suggest the presence of large hydrogen-dominated atmospheres.

Reversed size-dependent stabilization of ordered nanophases.

The size increase of a nanoscale material is commonly associated with the increased stability of its ordered phases. Here we give a counterexample to this trend by considering the formation of the defect-free L11 ordered phase in AgPt nanoparticles, and showing that it is better stabilized in small nanoparticles (up to 2.5 nm) than in larger ones, in which the ordered phase breaks in multiple domains or is interrupted by faults. The driving force for the L11 phase formation in small nanoparticles is the segregation of a monolayer silver shell (an Ag-skin) which prevents the element with higher surface energy (Pt) from occupying surface sites. With increasing particle size, the Ag-skin causes internal stress in the L11 domains which cannot thus exceed the critical size of ~2.5 nm. A multiscale modelling approach using full-DFT global optimization calculations and atomistic modelling is used to interpret the findings.

Ghrelin control of GH secretion and feeding behaviour: the role of the GHS-R1a receptor studied in vivo and in vitro using novel non-peptide ligands.

Energy homeostasis is controlled by a complex regulatory system of molecules that affect food intake and that are critical for maintaining a stable body weight during life. Ghrelin is a peptide of 28 amino acid synthesized predominantly by the stomach and the gut, which activate the type 1a growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a), a G-protein coupled receptor. The acylated form of ghrelin potently stimulates GH secretion both in vitro and in vivo in several animal species, including humans. Beside the endocrine effect, ghrelin shows also extraendocrine activities, including stimulation of feeding behaviour. Several classes of small synthetic peptide and non-peptide ligands of the GHS-R1a have been described and are able to release GH and stimulate food intake. However, in time, it appeared that the stimulating effects on GH secretion could be divorced from those on food intake, suggesting that more than a single receptor might be involved. Several experimental data have even questioned the physiological role of ghrelin in the control of GH secretion and energy metabolism. By using novel agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists for the GHS-R1a receptor, we have studied whether the stimulation of this receptor could account for the purported physiological role of ghrelin. Our results demonstrate that the ability to bind in vitro the GHS-R1a is not predictive of the in vivo biological activity of the compounds and that the endocrine and extraendocrine effects could be mediated also by receptors different from the GHS-R1a.

Central ghrelin gastroprotection involves nitric oxide/prostaglandin cross-talk.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ghrelin, a gut-brain peptide, is considered a gastroprotective factor in gastric mucosa. We investigated the role of prostaglandins (PG) and the possible interplay between PGs and nitric oxide (NO) in ghrelin gastroprotection against ethanol (EtOH)-induced gastric lesions. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the effects of (1) central ghrelin (4 mug per rat) injection on PGE(2) accumulation in normal or EtOH-lesioned gastric mucosa, (2) pretreatment with indomethacin (10 mg kg(-1), p.o.), a non-selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, and with a selective COX-1, SC560 (5 mg kg(-1), p.o.) or COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib (3.5 mg kg(-1), p.o.) on ghrelin gastroprotection against 50% EtOH (1 mL per rat)-induced gastric lesions, (3) the NO synthase inhibitor, L-NAME (70 mg kg(-1), s.c), on gastric PGE(2) content in ghrelin-treated rats and (4) central ghrelin on the expression of constitutive and inducible NOS and COX mRNA and on the localization of the immunoreactivity for COX-2 in the gastric mucosa exposed to EtOH. KEY RESULTS: Ghrelin increased PGE(2) in normal mucosa, whereas, it reversed the EtOH-induced PGE(2) surge. Ghrelin had no effect on mucosal COX-1 expression but reduced the EtOH-induced increase in COX-2 expression and immunoreactivity. Indomethacin and SC560, but not celecoxib, removed ghrelin gastroprotection. L-NAME prevented the PGE(2) surge induced by ghrelin and, like indomethacin, reduced EtOH-induced PGE(2) increase. Ghrelin enhanced eNOS expression and reduced iNOS mRNA. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that COX-1-derived PGs are mainly involved in ghrelin gastroprotection and that the constitutive-derived NO together with PGE(2) are involved in ghrelin gastroprotective activity.

Central dysregulations in the control of energy homeostasis and endocrine alterations in anorexia and bulimia nervosa.

In the last decades we have come to understand that the hypothalamus is a key region in controlling energy homeostasis. A number of control models have been proposed to explain the regulation of feeding behavior in physiological and pathological conditions, but all those based on imbalances of single factors fail to explain the disrupted regulation of energy supply in eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, as well as other psychiatric disorders. A growing amount of evidence demonstrates that many signaling molecules originated within the brain or coming from the adipose tissue or the gastro-enteric tract are involved in the highly complex process controlling food intake and energy expenditure. The recent discovery of leptin, ghrelin, and other factors have made it possible to penetrate in the still undefined pathophysiology of eating disorders with the hope of finding effective treatments for such diseases.

Obestatin inhibits feeding but does not modulate GH and corticosterone secretion in the rat.

Obestatin is a recently discovered 23 amino acids peptide derived from the ghrelin gene. As opposed to ghrelin, obestatin was shown to inhibit food intake in mice. The aims of this research were to study the effects of acute obestatin treatment on feeding behavior in the rat and its effects on GH and corticosterone secretion. Our results demonstrate that in young-adult male rats, obestatin effectively blunts the hunger caused by short-term starvation. Obestatin did not modify GH secretion in 10-day-old rats and did not antagonize the GH-releasing effects of hexarelin. Moreover, obestatin administration had no effects on spontaneous corticosterone secretion. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that in young-adult male rats the newly discovered obestatin can inhibit feeding but does not modify GH and corticosterone release in infant rats.

Evidence for a role of the GHS-R1a receptors in ghrelin inhibition of gastric acid secretion in the rat.

Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) has been previously shown to inhibit gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats. Two isoforms of GHS-R have been identified: GHS-R(1a) and GHS-R(1b). The present study aimed: (i) to characterise the type of GHS-R involved in the central gastric inhibitory activity of ghrelin by using des-octanoyl ghrelin, and synthetic GHS-R(1a) agonist (EP1572) and antagonist (D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6) and (ii) to investigate the relationship between ghrelin and cortistatin (CST) in the control of gastric acid secretion by using the natural neuropeptide CST-14 and the synthetic octapeptide CST-8. The specific interactions of all the compounds with GHS-R(1a) were determined by comparing their ability to displace labelled ghrelin or somatostatin from its receptors on rat hypothalamic membranes or on rat cardiomyocyte, respectively. Intracerebroventricular administration of 0.01 and 1 nmol/rat des-octanoyl ghrelin did not affect gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats, whereas EP1572 either i.c.v. (0.01-1 nmol/rat) or i.p. (10 and 20 nmol/kg) inhibited acid gastric secretion. Preteatment with D-Lys(3)GHRP-6 (3 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) was able to remove the inhibitory action of ghrelin (0.01 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) on gastric acid volume and acid output, thus indicating that the type 1a GHS-R likely mediates the gastric inhibitory action of ghrelin. This is supported by binding data showing that D-Lys(3)GHRP-6, but not des-octanoyl ghrelin, binds to hypothalamic GHS-R. CST-14 (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) did not affect either basal or ghrelin inhibition of gastric acid secretion. CST-8 (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) was able to counteract the gastric ghrelin response. The observation that CST-14 binds both GHR-S and somatostatin receptors, whereas CST-8 specifically displaces only ghrelin binding, indicates that CST-8 behaves as a GHS-R(1a) antagonist.

Different skeletal regional response to continuous brain infusion of leptin in the rat.

This study was designed to evaluate whether or not continuous intracerebroventricular infusion of leptin (1.5 microg/rat/24 h, for 28 days) produced different regional response on the skeleton of growing rats. Leptin reduce the accretion of total femoral bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD). This effect was related to a reduction of metaphyseal femur as no changes were detected in the diaphysis. Despite the reduced accretion in the volumetric of both femur and tibia compared to controls, leptin had no significant effects on the lumbar vertebrae. Urine deoxypyrydinoline and serum osteocalcin remained more elevated in the leptin-treated group as compared to controls. The results demonstrate that long-term central infusion of leptin activates bone remodeling with a negative balance. Leptin induces distinct responses in the different structure of bone and in the axial and appendicular skeleton.

Intracerebroventricular acute and chronic administration of obestatin minimally affect food intake but not weight gain in the rat.

We studied the effect of the acute central administration of obestatin on food intake and body weight in short-term starved male rats, and those of 28-day continuous intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion of obestatin in free feeding rats. In 16-h starved rats, obestatin induced a trend toward a reduction of food intake that did not reach statistical significance. In fed rats, the icv infusion of obestatin significantly decreased food consumption in the first day of treatment; but the anorexigenic effect of obestatin vanished thereafter. Interestingly, the body weight of rats infused for 28 days with obestatin was superimposable to that of the respective control at all time intervals. In all, our results indicate that the anorexigenic effect of obestatin is of little account and that the peptide does not modify energy metabolism in the long-term administration.

Ghrelin in gastroenteric pathophysiology.

Ghrelin, an acylated peptide produced predominantly by the stomach, has been discovered to be a natural ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a). It is localized in distinct cells of the gastric mucosa, mainly distributed in the mid portion of the oxyntic gland characterized by P/D1 granules in man and X/A-like granules in rodents. The ghrelin cell represents the second most frequent endocrine cell type after the enterochromaffin-like cells in gastric oxyntic mucosa, pointing to a potentially relevant role in the physiology of the stomach. Ghrelin has no relevant homology with any known gastrointestinal peptide and displays strong GH-releasing activity both in animals and in humans. However, in addition to stimulating GH secretion, ghrelin possesses several other endocrine and extraendocrine biological activities that are explained by the widespread distribution of ghrelin and GHS-R1a expression. In the rat, ghrelin exerts a control in gastric acid secretion and motility: the gastric acid secretion is stimulated by peripheral administration of high doses of ghrelin, but inhibited by very low doses of ghrelin delivered into the central nervous system. Moreover, ghrelin provides a potent and dose-related gastroprotective action against ethanol- and stress-induced gastric ulcers. The integrity of both nitric oxide (NO) system and capsaicin afferent nerves are required for the gastroprotective effect of ghrelin, whereas the vagus nerve might be involved in conveying ghrelinergic signal from periphery to the brain. In addition, prostaglandins derived by the constitutive cyclooxygenase (COX) activity are essential for the protective activity of ghrelin in ethanol and stress-induced gastric lesions. Given its prevailing role in physiological and pathophysiological gastric function, the discovery of ghrelin will open new perspectives and potential clinical implications in the gastroenteric field.

Effects of hexarelin against acid-independent and acid-dependent ulcerogens in the rat.

The effects of intracerebroventricular (icv) or subcutaneous (sc) hexarelin (Hexa) administration, against gastric ulcers induced by ethanol (50%, 1 ml/rat/os) or Indomethacin (20 mg/kg/os) were examined in conscious rats. Hexa at 1 nmol/rat, icv or 10 nmol/kg, sc reduced ethanol-induced ulcers by 47% and 32% respectively. Hexa, but not ghrelin significantly worsened (+40%) Indomethacin-induced ulcers when injected sc. Hexa-gastroprotection against ethanol-induced ulcers was removed by the GHS-R antagonist (D-Lys3)-GRPR-6 and by the inhibitor of NO-synthase (NOS) Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Semiquantitative RT-PCR assay of gastric NOS mRNA isoforms revealed that the reduction in iNOS-derived NO and the increase of constitutive-derived NO are relevant for the gastroprotection of Hexa against ethanol-induced gastric damage.

Ghrelin protects against ethanol-induced gastric ulcers in rats: studies on the mechanisms of action.

Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand for GH secretagogue receptors, has been reported to influence acid gastric secretion and motility, but its potential gastroprotective effect is unknown. The aims of this study were 1) to examine the effects of central and peripheral administration of ghrelin on ethanol-induced gastric ulcers in conscious rats, and 2) to investigate the possible roles of nitric oxide (NO), vagal nerve, and sensory fibers in the gastric effects of ghrelin. Ghrelin was administered either intracerebroventricularly or sc 30 min before ethanol, and mucosal lesions were examined macroscopically. Additionally, rats were either treated with the inhibitor of NO synthesis N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or underwent bilateral cervical vagotomy or capsaicin-induced sensory denervation. Conventional histology and immunohistochemistry for ghrelin, gastrin, and somatostatin were performed on gastric specimens from representative rats. Central ghrelin (4-4,000 ng/rat) dose-dependently reduced ethanol-induced gastric ulcers by 39-77%. Subcutaneous ghrelin administration (80 micro g/kg) reduced ulcer depth only. L-NAME and capsaicin, but not vagotomy, prevented the gastroprotective effect of central ghrelin (4000 ng/rat). This is the first evidence that ghrelin exerts a potent central gastroprotective activity against ethanol-induced lesions. The gastroprotective effect of ghrelin is mediated by endogenous NO release and requires the integrity of sensory nerve fibers.

The role of sensory neurons in the antiulcer effect of centrally injected amylin in rat.

Central administration of amylin (2.2 microg/rat, i.c.v.) reduces (from a minimum of 67% to 83%) indomethacin (Indo, 20 mg Kg(-1), orally) induced ulcers in rats. The anti-ulcer effect of the peptide is not removed by the administration of prokinetic drugs like domperidone or neostigmine but it is reduced by 35% in rats treated with capsaicin or with the CGRP antagonist, CGRP(8-37). These data indicate that amylin gastroprotection involves capsaicin-sensitive nerve fiber leading to CGRP-dependent gastric vasodilatory effect. Additional mechanisms could involve noradrenergic alpha(2) receptors as the peptide gastroprotective activity is reduced from 67% to 20% by the alpha(2) antagonist yohimbine.

Amylin compared with calcitonin: competitive binding studies in rat brain and antinociceptive activity.

Binding studies for rat amylin (AMY) and salmon calcitonin (sCT) were performed on rat membranes prepared from pons and medulla oblongata of rats. The aim was to see whether specific binding sites for AMY and/or for sCT present in these areas could be relevant to some of the biological activities of the two peptides. Binding sites specific for [125I]AMY are present in the pons-medulla of rat brain as AMY, but not sCT, was able to displace radiolabeled AMY binding with an IC50 = 3.7+/-0.5x10(-10) M. In contrast, binding of [125I]sCT was displaced by both sCT and AMY, although with different potencies, the IC50 for sCT being 1+/-0.1x10(-11) M, and for AMY, 1.8+/-0.08x10(-7) M. The functional significance of the presence of these binding sites was evaluated in two different nociceptive tests, hot-plate and tail-flick. In the tail-flick test neither AMY (5-10 microg/rat, i.c.v.) nor sCT (10 microg/rat i.c.v.) showed antinociceptive activity, whereas in the hot-plate test AMY (10 microg/rat, i.c.v.) significantly increased the response latencies as did sCT (250 ng/rat, i.c.v.). These results demonstrated that a 40-fold greater dose of AMY is necessary to produce a comparable antinociceptive effect to that exerted by sCT. These findings are in accordance with the low affinity of AMY for sCT binding sites in rat pons-medulla. It is therefore suggested that the central inhibitory activity of AMY on pain perception involves interaction with sCT receptors whereas the selective AMY binding sites subserve other (as yet unknown) functions.