Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 122(5): 1514-1523, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18971736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with craniofacial dysostosis may require correction for hypertelorbitism and midface hypoplasia. Traditionally, these procedures were sequential or staged, and used acute advancement with bone grafting and rigid fixation. The authors reviewed a series of combined, one-stage facial bipartition and monobloc distraction procedures using internal devices. They describe the Roman arch, keystone fixation modification to maximize the stability of the bipartition segments and support the vertical load of the distraction forces. METHODS: Patients diagnosed at the University of California, Los Angeles as having craniofacial dysostosis with hypertelorbitism and midface hypoplasia who underwent the Roman arch, keystone fixation procedure were included in the study (n = 13). Reduction of interdacryon and intercanthal distances and the lateral cephalometric horizontal change of the forehead, midface, and maxilla were studied postoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: There were no serious complications (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, frontal bone loss); there was a 10 percent rate of total complications (wound infection). Facial bipartition successfully narrowed the interdacryon distance by a mean of 55 percent (21 mm), with only a 3-mm relapse. The mean distraction advancement/relapse was as follows: forehead, +16 mm/-2 mm; midface, 14 mm/-1 mm; and maxilla, 13 mm/-1 mm. Only one of 13 patients required a repeated monobloc procedure. Of the seven patients who reached skeletal maturity, 86 percent underwent a subsequent Le Fort I and/or III procedure. CONCLUSION: The Roman arch, keystone fixation modification of a combined facial bipartition with monobloc distraction using internal devices provided a stable construct for advancement, with minimal relapse.


Subject(s)
Craniofacial Dysostosis/surgery , Internal Fixators , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Adolescent , Cephalometry , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniofacial Dysostosis/epidemiology , Face/abnormalities , Face/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Meningitis/epidemiology , Morbidity , Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentation , Recurrence , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...