Time course of iron metabolism in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Altered iron metabolism plays a central role in the development of anaemia in critically ill patients but the time course of iron status in septic and non-septic critically ill patients has not been well defined. METHODS: Prospective study in a 34-bed medico-surgical ICU. The complete blood count, iron, ferritin, transferrin, and transferrin receptor concentrations, transferrin saturation and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were measured on days 1, 3 and 5 of the ICU stay in 95 consecutive ICU patients (33 with sepsis and 62 without). RESULTS: Despite an identical complete blood count on day 1, septic patients had significantly lower iron concentrations (21 [13-34] vs 50[28-75] microg/dL, p<0.001), transferrin concentrations (169[121-215] vs 214[173-247] mg/dL; p=0.003), and transferrin saturation (11[7-15] vs 19[11-25]%; p= 0.004), and higher ferritin concentrations (432[184-773] vs 204[78-354] ng/mL; p=0.002) than non-septic patients. These alterations were associated with a lower reticulocyte count (42[29-61] vs 58[48-77] x 10(3)/mm3; p=0.028). On day 1, CRP concentrations, which were higher in septic than in non-septic patients (20.0[13.5-27.5] vs 2.3[0.7-5.9] mg/dL; p<0.001), were directly correlated with ferritin concentrations (rho=0.55, p<0.001) and inversely correlated with transferrin concentrations (rho=-0.49, p=0.0001) and transferrin saturation (rho=-0.49, p=0.0001). After 3 days, iron and transferrin concentrations were identical in septic and non-septic patients. Iron metabolism remained altered in both populations until the 5th day. CONCLUSIONS: Iron status is rapidly altered in critically ill patients, especially in septic patients. These alterations persist during the course of the disease and are associated with decreased erythropoiesis.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between parecoxib and ketorolac for early postoperative analgesia following nasal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the efficacy of parecoxibfor postoperative analgesia after endoscopic turbinate and sinus surgery, with the non-selective non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), ketorolac. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with an ASA physical status I-II, receiving functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and endoscopic turbinectomy after local infiltration with 1% mepivacaine, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous administration of either 40 mg parecoxib (N.=25) or 30 mg ketorolac (N.=25), 15 min before the discontinuation of anaesthesia and then every 8 h postoperatively. A blinded observer recorded the incidence and severity of pain upon admission to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), as well as 10, 20, and 30 min after PACU admission. Thereafter, observations continued every 1 h for the first 6 h, and then 12 h and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: The area under the curve of the visual analogue scale (AUCVAS) calculated during the study period was 635 (26-1 413) in the Parecoxib group and 669 (28-1 901) in the Ketorolac group (P=0.54). Rescue morphine analgesia was required by 12 patients (48%) in the Parecoxib group and 11 patients (44%) in the Ketorolac group (P<0.05); while mean morphine consumption was 5 +/- 2.5 mg and 5 +/- 2.0 mg in Ketorolac and Parecoxib groups, respectively (P<0.05). No differences in the incidence of side effects were recorded between the two groups. Patient satisfaction was similarly high in both groups, and all patients were discharged uneventfully 24 h after surgery. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing endoscopic nasal surgery and local infiltration with 1% mepivacaine, parecoxib administered before discontinuing general anesthesia is as effective in treating early postoperative pain as ketorolac.

A recovery room-based acute pain service.

AIM: Despite routine postoperative pain management improves recovery and reduces postoperative morbidity and overall costs, and the availability of a large armamentarium of analgesic techniques and drugs, a significant portion of patients do not receive adequate postoperative pain control. We describe a recovery room (RR) based acute pain service model. METHODS: Guidelines on postoperative pain and therapeutic protocols were instituted in January 1999. The analgesic endpoint was a visual analogic scale (VAS) below 4 for all surgical patients for the first 48-72 h. The RR, run by one anesthesiologist and 2 nurses and one assistant, acted as a coordination centre. Discharge from the RR was subject to achieving effective analgesia. Nurses of each ward monitored VAS along with vital signs, administered rescue doses if necessary, and reported to the RR nurse when needed. RR nurses monitored the patient at least twice daily and reported to the anesthesiologist. We have distributed an anonymous questionnaire, within surgical wards, to both surgeons and nurses to evaluate their perception of pain management and of this acute pain service (APS) model. RESULTS: VAS was maintained significantly <4. Analgesic drug consumption increased between 1997, 2000 (first year of APS) and 2004. The auditing process confirmed the desire of all professional figures to be informed and involved in acute pain management as part of a coordinated and systematic approach to the surgical patient. CONCLUSION: A RR-based APS can effectively act as coordinating centre for acute pain treatment without adjunctive personnel.