ABSTRACT
The Yorkshire-cross swine model is a valuable translational model commonly used to study cardiovascular physiology and response to insult. Although the effects of vasoactive medications have been well described in healthy swine, the effects of these medications during hemorrhagic shock are less studied. In this study, we sought to expand the utility of the swine model by characterizing the hemodynamic changes that occurred after the administration of commonly available vasoactive medications during euvolemic and hypovolemic states. To this end, we anesthetized and established femoral arterial, central venous, and pulmonary arterial access in 15 juvenile Yorkshire-cross pigs. The pigs then received a series of rapidly metabolized but highly vasoactive medications in a standard dosing sequence. After completion of this sequence, each pig underwent a 30-mL/kg hemorrhage over 10 min, and the standard dosing sequence was repeated. We then used standard sta- tistical techniques to compare the effects of these vasoactive medications on a variety of hemodynamic parameters between the euvolemic and hemorrhagic states. All subjects completed the study protocol. The responses in the hemorrhagic state were often attenuated or even opposite of those in the euvolemic state. For example, phenylephrine decreased the mean arterial blood pressure during the euvolemic state but increased it in the hemorrhagic state. These results clarify previously poorly defined responses to commonly used vasoactive agents during the hemorrhagic state in swine. Our findings also demonstrate the need to consider the complex and dynamic physiologic state of hemorrhage when anticipating the effects of vasoactive drugs and planning study protocols.
Subject(s)
Shock, Hemorrhagic , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Hemodynamics , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Humans , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , SwineABSTRACT
The ability to quickly and accurately determine cortisol as a biomarker for stress is a valuable tool in assessing the wellbeing of NHP. In this study, 2 methods of collecting saliva (a commercial collection device and passive drool) and the resulting free salivary cortisol levels were compared with total serum cortisol concentration in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) and African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) at 2 collection time points. Serum and salivary cortisol levels were determined using a competitive quantitative ELISA. In addition, both saliva collection methods were evaluated for volume collected and ease of use. Compared with passive drool, the experimental collection device was more reliable in collecting sufficient volumes of saliva, and the resulting salivary cortisol values demonstrated stronger correlation with serum cortisol concentration in all species and collection days except cynomolgus macaques on day 1. This saliva collection device allows quick and reliable sample collection for the determination of salivary cortisol levels. In addition, the results might provide a useful tool for evaluating hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity or the physiologic stress reaction in NHP as well as a biomarker of psychologic stress states in a variety of situations.
