Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
2.
Acad Med ; 89(5): 705-11, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24667505

ABSTRACT

Although evidence of medical student mistreatment has accumulated for more than 20 years, only recently have professional organizations like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the American Medical Association truly acknowledged it as an issue. Since 1991, the AAMC's annual Medical School Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) has included questions about mistreatment. Responses to the GQ have become the major source of evidence of the prevalence and types of mistreatment. This article reviews national mistreatment data, using responses to the GQ from 2000 through 2012; examines how students' experiences have changed over time; and highlights the implications of this information for the broader medical education system. The authors discuss what mistreatment is, including the changing definitions from the GQ; the prevalence, types, and sources of mistreatment; and evidence of students reporting incidents. In addition, they discuss next steps, including better defining mistreatment, specifically public humiliation and belittling, taking into account students' subjective evaluations; understanding and addressing the influence of institutional culture and what institutions can learn from current approaches at other institutions; and developing better systems to report and respond to reports of mistreatment. They conclude with a discussion of how mistreatment currently is conceptualized within the medical education system and the implications of that conceptualization for eradicating mistreatment in the future.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Interprofessional Relations , Professional Misconduct/ethics , Students, Medical/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , Faculty, Medical , Female , Humans , Male , Needs Assessment , Professional Misconduct/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Medical/standards , Schools, Medical/trends , United States , Young Adult
3.
Acad Med ; 87(12): 1705-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23095925

ABSTRACT

The College of Human Medicine (CHM) at Michigan State University, which graduated its first class in 1972, was one of the first community-based medical schools in the country. It was established as a state-funded medical school with specific legislative directives to educate primary care physicians who would serve the needs of the state, particularly those of underserved areas. However, the model has proved challenging to sustain with the many changes to the health care system and the economic climate of Michigan. In 2006, a two-phase expansion plan was implemented, and in 2010, CHM permanently expanded the matriculating class from 106 to 200 students with the establishment of a second four-year site for medical education in Grand Rapids. This article describes what school leaders and faculty have learned as they look back at the opportunity provided by expansion as well as the growing pains and lessons learned. The community-based model met many of the mission-related goals for CHM's graduates, who represent a diverse group of practitioners whose values resonate with the school's mission. Expansion has offered an opportunity to explore new research and clinical opportunities as well as to more fully realize the potential of community partners to meet local health care needs and reinvent a robust future for community-integrated medical education.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Community Health Services , Curriculum , Education, Distance , Faculty, Medical , Humans , Michigan , Organizational Culture , Organizational Policy , Primary Health Care , Professional Competence , Schools, Medical/economics , Videoconferencing
4.
Public Health ; 122(7): 700-7, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18313702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NHAMCS) are surveillance systems in the USA that track provider practice patterns at ambulatory care visits. This study investigated the adequacy of the NAMCS/NHAMCS for surveillance of childhood obesity practice patterns. METHODS: The frequency of obesity visits in the 1997-2000 NAMCS/NHAMCS (outpatient component) was compared with obesity prevalence among children who reported a physician visit in the preceding 12 months in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000. Obesity was identified using the International Classification of Diseases 9th revision clinical modification code ICD-9-278.0 in the NAMCS/NHAMCS. For the NHANES, age- and gender-specific body mass index >95th percentile was used. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2000, obesity was identified in 4.1 million (0.8%) of 516 million ambulatory care visits. With an obesity prevalence of 14.2% from the NHANES survey, NAMCS/NHAMCS only identified 5.6% of all children aged 2-17 years >95th percentile. Of those identified, the rate of obesity visits in the NAMCS/NHAMCS was lowest for non-Hispanic Whites (3.9%) compared with non-Hispanic Blacks (6.9%) and Hispanics (10.2%). CONCLUSION: The very infrequent reporting of obesity in the NAMCS/NHAMCS suggests that these surveillance systems do not reflect how healthcare providers identify and care for overweight children. Collecting weight and height measures would improve their utility in tracking identification and management of overweight children.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Obesity/diagnosis , Population Surveillance , Professional Practice , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Surveys , United States
5.
Biol Psychiatry ; 63(3): 325-31, 2008 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17868654

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and low-level lead exposure are high-prevalence conditions among children, and studies of large populations have suggested that these conditions are related. We examine this relationship in children from a community sample exposed to average background levels of lead who have a diagnosis of ADHD that is established by clinical criteria. METHODS: One hundred fifty children ages 8-17 years participated (mean age = 14 years; 53 control subjects, 47 ADHD Predominantly Inattentive type, 50 ADHD-Combined type). Diagnosis was formally established with a semi-structured clinical interview and parent and teacher ratings. Children completed intelligence quotient (IQ) measures and the stop task (a neuropsychological measure). Lead was assayed from whole blood with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Blood lead levels in this sample closely matched US population exposure averages, with a maximum level of 3.4 mug/dL. Blood lead levels were statistically significantly higher in ADHD-combined type than in non-ADHD control (p < .05) children. Blood lead was associated with symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity but not inattention-disorganization, after control of covariates. Blood lead levels were linked with a lower IQ (p < .05), but IQ did not account for effects on hyperactivity. Instead, hyperactivity mediated effects of lead on IQ. Effects of blood lead on hyperactivity-impulsivity were mediated by poor performance on the stop task. This mediation effect was independent of effects of lead on IQ. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level lead exposure might be an important contributor to ADHD. Its effects seem to be mediated by less effective cognitive control, consistent with a route of influence via striatal-frontal neural circuits.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/blood , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/complications , Cognition Disorders/blood , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Lead/blood , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Intelligence/physiology , Male , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Neuropsychological Tests
6.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci ; 6(1): 18-30, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16869226

ABSTRACT

There is resurgent interest in the psychiatric literature in endophenotypes, variables thought to more strongly reflect the effects of candidate genes than do manifest disorders. In a sample of 176 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 52 of their siblings, we examined the validity of several putative endophenotypes for ADHD that represent commonly used clinical measures of multiple cognitive/neuropsychological domains of executive functions (EFs). We review their distributional normality, their relations to ADHD symptoms in probands and unaffected siblings relative to nonADHD controls, and their correlation in siblings. We also tested theEF measures' associations with the ADRA2A gene and whether they mediated or moderated the associations between ADHD and ADRA2A. Several EF measures showed association with ADRA2A, as well as moderation, but not mediation, of its association with ADHD. Implications of the results for evaluating the validity and utility of putative endophenotype measures and for finding candidate gene effects on ADHD are discussed.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Problem Solving/physiology , Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2/genetics , Child, Preschool , Choice Behavior/physiology , DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Family Health , Female , Gene Frequency , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational , Reaction Time/genetics , Reproducibility of Results
8.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 44(7): 690-8, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15968238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relationship between a family adversity index and DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes and associated behavior problems. The relationship of family adversity to symptoms and subtypes of ADHD was examined. METHOD: Parents and 206 children aged 7-13 completed diagnostic interviews and rating scales about socioeconomic status, parental lifetime psychiatric disorders, marital conflict, and stressful life events. RESULTS: Children with ADHD combined type experienced more risk factors than community controls (p = .002) or children with ADHD predominantly inattentive type (p = .02). The families of children with ADHD combined type described more risk factors associated with family adversity than the families of children with ADHD inattentive type and the control group. Parent-rated symptoms of child inattention/disorganization were related uniquely to the adversity index score independently of conduct disorder symptoms. Children's perceptions of marital conflict were independently related to inattention and hyperactivity behaviors as rated by parents and teachers after control of all other risk factors. Oppositional defiant symptoms were independently related to marital conflict and maternal psychopathology, whereas conduct disorder symptoms were uniquely related to low socioeconomic status and maternal psychopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Family adversity is related to ADHD combined type in children and may be related specifically to ADHD symptoms in addition to conduct disorder symptoms.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Family/psychology , Adolescent , Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors
10.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 50(5): 1049-92, vi, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14558681

ABSTRACT

Management of a child or adolescent with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is reviewed, including psychological and pharmacologic approaches. Psychological treatment includes psychotherapy, cognitive-behavior therapy, support groups, parent training, educator/teacher training, biofeedback, meditation, and social skills training. Medications are reviewed that research has revealed can improve the core symptomatology of a child or adolescent with ADHD. These medications include stimulants, antidepressants, alpha-2 agonists, and a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Management of ADHD should include a multi-modal approach, involving appropriate educational interventions, appropriate psychological management of the patient (child or adolescent), and judicious use of medications. Parents, school officials, and clinicians must work together to help all children and adolescents with ADHD achieve their maximum potential.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/economics , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Health Care Costs , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Humans
11.
Adolesc Med ; 13(3): 599-624, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12270803

ABSTRACT

The use of medication is an important element in the management of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). An overview of basic psychopharmacologic principles is presented, followed by a review of medications that are well-documented as effective in the amelioration of ADHD symptomatology. These include stimulants (methylphenidate, amphetamines, and pemoline), tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine, and nortriptyline), alpha2-agonists (clonidine and guanfacine), and bupropion. Medications used to treat comorbidities of ADHD (e.g., depression, anxiety, disruptive disorders) are not considered in this review. Psychopharmacology is a very useful tool as part of the overall management of ADHD in adolescents.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Humans
12.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 23(1): 23-30, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11889348

ABSTRACT

Psychotropic medications are increasingly used for very young children. Patterns of use in a well-described group of children 3 years and younger with a diagnostic label of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) reveal both reasons to use such medications and concerns about how these medications are used. Of 223 children with ADHD, more than half (n = 127) received psychotropic medications in an idiosyncratic manner, both in the specific medication and in use over time. Almost half of the children who were medicated did not have opportunities for monitoring as often as every 3 months, despite the fact that more than half received psychotropic medications for 6 months or longer. Children with comorbid mental health conditions and chronic health conditions were at greater risk for receiving psychotropic medications. These patterns of use demonstrate a compelling need for guidance in psychopharmacological treatment of very young children.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records , Michigan , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Sampling Studies
13.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 41(1): 59-66, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11800208

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare a focused set of component neuropsychological executive functions in the DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined (ADHD-C) and inattentive (ADHD-I) subtypes. METHOD: The Stop task, Tower of London, Stroop task, Trailmaking Test, and output speed measures were completed by 105 boys and girls aged 7-12 classified as either DSM-IV ADHD-C (n = 46), ADHD-I (n = 18), or community control (n = 41). RESULTS: Both subtypes had deficits on output speed. A group x gender interaction was observed on the Stop task: boys with ADHD-C were impaired versus boys with ADHD-I, whereas girls in the two subtypes did not differ. The ADHD-C type had a deficit in planning. Neither ADHD group had a deficit in interference control per se, although they were slower than controls on the Stroop tasks. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD-I shares neuropsychological deficits with ADHD-C in the domain of output speed; on most domains the subtypes did not differ. Neuropsychological distinctions between these ADHD subtypes may be few, depending on which domain of executive functioning is assessed, and these distinctions differ by gender. In the case of boys, the two subtypes may be distinguished by the specificity of motor inhibition deficits to ADHD-C.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/classification , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Reaction Time
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...