ABSTRACT
The Future of Pediatric Education II (FOPE II) Project was a 3-year, grant-funded initiative, which continued the work begun by the 1978 Task Force on the Future of Pediatric Education. Its primary goal was to proactively provide direction for pediatric education for the 21st century. To achieve this goal, 5 topic-specific workgroups were formed: 1) the Pediatric Generalists of the Future Workgroup, 2) the Pediatric Specialists of the Future Workgroup, 3) the Pediatric Workforce Workgroup, 4) the Financing of Pediatric Education Workgroup, and 5) the Education of the Pediatrician Workgroup. The FOPE II Final Report was recently published as a supplement to Pediatrics (The Future of Pediatric Education II: organizing pediatric education to meet the needs of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults in the 21st century. Pediatrics. 2000;105(suppl):161-212). It is also available on the project web site at: This report reflects the deliberations and recommendations of the Pediatric Generalists of the Future Workgroup of the Task Force on FOPE II. The report looks at 5 factors that have led to changes in child health needs and pediatric practice over the last 2 decades. The report then presents a vision for the role and scope of the pediatrician of the future and the core attributes, skills, and competencies pediatricians caring for infants, children, adolescents, and young adults will need in the 21st century. Pediatrics 2000;106(suppl):1199-1223; pediatrics, medical education, children, adolescents, health care delivery.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical/standards , Pediatrics/education , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Education, Medical/methods , Education, Medical/trends , Humans , Infant , Pediatrics/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
Pediatricians and pediatric medical and surgical subspecialists should know their legal responsibilities to protect the privacy of identifiable patient health information. Although paper and electronic medical records have the same privacy standards, health data that are stored or transmitted electronically are vulnerable to unique security breaches. This statement describes the privacy and confidentiality needs and rights of pediatric patients and suggests appropriate security strategies to deter unauthorized access and inappropriate use of patient data. Limitations to physician liability are discussed for transferred data. Any new standards for patient privacy and confidentiality must balance the health needs of the community and the rights of the patient without compromising the ability of pediatricians to provide quality care.
Subject(s)
Confidentiality , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Patient Advocacy , Pediatrics/standards , Computer Security , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Internet , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/legislation & jurisprudence , Registries , Social Responsibility , United StatesSubject(s)
Child Behavior Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/economics , Patient Care Team/economics , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Adolescent , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/classification , Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Managed Care Programs/economics , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Primary Health Care/economics , Referral and Consultation/economicsSubject(s)
Turner Syndrome , Adolescent , Adult , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Child , Electrocardiography , Health Care Costs , Health Maintenance Organizations , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore through a pilot study the relationship between appropriateness (medical necessity) and variations in pediatric hospital admission rates across several communities in the Boston (Mass) area for two common pediatric conditions with extremely variable admission rates: pneumonia and bronchitis/asthma. DESIGN: We identified five communities in the greater Boston area with high, average, and below-average ratios of observed to expected admissions for the study conditions. Diagnosis-specific, criteria-based utilization review instruments were developed by community-based pediatricians and applied by trained nurse reviewers to medical records. ADMISSIONS STUDIED: All admissions for pneumonia (diagnosis related group [DRG] 91) and bronchitis/asthma (DRG 98) of study area residents younger than 18 years to participating hospitals during fiscal year 1986. OUTCOME MEASURES: For each area, we calculated age-adjusted admission rates, age-adjusted observed to expected ratios, and rates of inappropriate admissions. We tested the hypothesis that admission rates and inappropriateness rates were directly related. RESULTS: We deemed 9.4% of pneumonia admissions and 4.4% of bronchitis/asthma admissions inappropriate. Rates of inappropriate admissions were not significantly associated with admission rates in this local pilot study for either study condition at P < .05. However, in one community both rates were high for both conditions. Feedback of findings to the key local hospital there resulted in sharp decreases in admission rates for DRGs 91 and 98 in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that higher pediatric admission rates may not be associated with higher rates of inappropriateness. Further research is needed, with a larger number of communities, to differentiate practice patterns more precisely and explore patient and family preferences.
