ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Gastric acid inhibition is beneficial in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). The aim of this double-blind study was to test whether somatostatin (SST) increases intragastric pH in PUB as compared with pantoprazole (PAN) and placebo (PLA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive SST (500 microg/h+250 microg bolus), or PAN (8 mg/h+80 mg bolus) or PLA (normal saline) i.v., for 24 h. All patients underwent gastric pH monitoring during the infusion of the trial drugs. RESULTS: The three groups (SST, n=14; PAN, n=14; PLA, n=15) were comparable for age, gender, aetiology of PUB and laboratory data at admission. Mean (+/-SE) baseline pH levels in the fundus increased during the administration of the trial drugs (SST: 1.94+/-0.18 to 6.13+/-0.37, p<0.0001; PAN: 1.93+/-0.16 to 5.65+/-0.37, p<0.0001; PLA: 1.86+/-0.12 to 2.10+/-0.15, p=0.0917). During the first 12 h of infusion, the mean (+/-SE) percentage time spent above pH 4.0 and 5.4 was higher with SST versus PAN (84.4%+/-4.8 versus 55.1%+/-8.3, p=0.0049 and 74.2%+/-6.5 versus 47.1%+/-8.3, p=0.0163, respectively) and there was a trend favouring the SST group regarding the time spent above pH 6.0 and 6.8 (65.7%+/-6.4 versus 43.3%+/-8.2, p=0.0669 and 49.2%+/-7.7 versus 28.4+/-6.6, p=0.0738, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In PUB, both SST and PAN inhibit gastric acid secretion as compared with placebo. However, during the first 12 h of the infusion, SST was more effective than PAN in maintaining high intragastric pH. These results may provide a rationale for the administration of SST in PUB.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Omeprazole/analogs & derivatives , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Sulfoxides/therapeutic use , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gastric Acidity Determination , Hormones/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Pantoprazole , Prospective Studies , Proton Pump InhibitorsABSTRACT
During variceal bleeding, several factors may increase portal pressure, which in turn may precipitate further bleeding. This study investigates the early effects of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) and endoscopic band ligation (EBL) on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) during acute bleeding and the possible influence in outcome. In 50 cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices treated with EIS (n = 25) or EBL (n = 25), we performed repeated HVPG measurements before and immediately after endoscopic treatment (time 0) and every 24 hours for a 5-day period. Endotherapy was continued until the varices were too small for further treatment. Both groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, Child-Turcotte-Pugh grade, and HVPG. In the EBL and EIS groups, a significant (P <.0001) increase was observed in mean portal pressure (20.7 mm Hg +/- 4.4 SD and 21.5 mm Hg +/- 4.5 SD, respectively) immediately after treatment (time 0) as compared with pretreatment (18.1 +/- 4.5 and 18.1 +/- 4.0). However, HVPG in the EBL group returned to baseline values within 48 hours after treatment, while in the EIS group it remained high during the 120-hour study period (P <.0001). Bleeding stopped in all patients after endotherapy. During the 42-day follow-up period, the rebleeding rate over time was lower in the EBL group compared with the EIS group (P =.024). Patients with an initial HVPG greater than 16 mm Hg had, despite endoscopic treatment, a significantly higher likelihood of death (P =.024) and overall failure (P =.037) [correction]. In conclusion, during acute variceal bleeding EIS, but not EBL, causes a sustained increase in HVPG, which is followed by a higher rebleeding rate.
Subject(s)
Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Portal Pressure , Sclerotherapy/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Emergency Treatment , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/mortality , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Ligation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , RecurrenceSubject(s)
Gastric Emptying/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Hormones/pharmacology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Somatostatin/pharmacology , Emergency Medical Services , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM: We conducted a prospective, randomized comparison of endoscopic variceal ligation, sclerotherapy and metoclopramide injection in order to evaluate their early effect on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with established cirrhosis and an episode of variceal bleeding controlled by one session of endoscopic therapy were randomized to undergo an oesophageal manometry. The patients' lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was evaluated, prior to and immediately after a single session of ligation (n = 10), a single session of sclerotherapy (n = 8) or a bolus injection of 20 mg metoclopramide hydrochloride (n = 8). RESULTS: Ligation produced a higher early increase in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (from 12.3 +/- 2.3 to 27.8 +/- 3.0 mmHg) as compared with sclerotherapy (from 13.6 +/- 2.5 to 22.4 +/- 4.5 mmHg) or metoclopramide injection (from 14.6 +/- 3.2 to 22.5 +/- 2.9 mmHg); (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that ligation of oesophageal varices produces an early increase in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in cirrhotic patients.
