Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg ; 36(Pt A): 121-126, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27780772

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Stoma formation delays discharge after colorectal surgery. Stoma education is widely recommended, but little data are available regarding whether educational interventions are effective. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme with dedicated ERAS and stoma nurse specialists focusing on counselling and stoma education can reduce the length of hospital stay, re-admission, and stoma-related complications and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to current stoma education in a traditional standard care pathway. METHODS: In a single-center study 122 adult patients eligible for laparoscopic or open colorectal resection who received a planned stoma were treated in either the ERAS program with extended stoma education (n = 61) or standard care with current stoma education (n = 61). The primary endpoint was total postoperative hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were postoperative hospital stay, major or minor morbidity, early stoma-related complications, health-related quality of life, re-admission rate, and mortality. HRQoL was measured by the generic 15D instrument. RESULTS: Total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group with education than the standard care group (median [range], 6 days [2-21 days] vs. 9 days [5-45 days]; p < 0.001). Regarding overall major and minor morbidity, re-admission rate, HRQoL, stoma-related complications and 30-day mortality, the two treatment groups exhibited similar outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving a planned stoma can be included in an ERAS program. Pre-operative and postoperative stoma education in an enhanced recovery programme is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay without any difference in re-admission rate or early stoma-related complications.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Colostomy/adverse effects , Critical Pathways , Ileostomy/adverse effects , Patient Education as Topic , Surgical Stomas/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Perioperative Care , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 18(6): 603-11, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27273854

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare patients treated using a multimodal approach [enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)], with a special focus on counselling, to patients treated in a standard conventional care pathway, who underwent elective colorectal resection. METHOD: In a single-centre trial, adult patients eligible for open or laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomized to an ERAS programme or standard care. The primary end-point was postoperative total hospital stay. Identical discharge criteria were defined for both treatment groups. Secondary end-points included postoperative complications, postoperative C-reactive protein levels, postoperative hospital stay, readmission rate and mortality. All parameters were recorded before operation, on the day of surgery and daily thereafter until discharge. RESULTS: Total hospital stay was significantly shorter among patients randomized to ERAS than among the standard group [median 5 days (range 2-50 days) vs median 8 days (range 2-48 days); P = 0.001]. The two treatment groups exhibited similar outcomes regarding overall major and minor morbidity, reoperation rate, readmission rate and 30-day mortality. There were also no differences in tolerance of enteral nutrition or in the inflammatory response, as reflected by postoperative C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSION: ERAS care was associated with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay. Without any difference in surgical or general complications, tolerance of enteral nutrition or postoperative C-reactive protein levels, peri-operative information and guidance for ensuring that patients comply with the ERAS approach appear to be important factors to reduce the length of hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols/standards , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/standards , Guideline Adherence , Perioperative Care/standards , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy/standards , Convalescence , Counseling , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Perioperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...