Exploring medical students' experiences with indigenous patient care: a phenomenological study.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous Peoples in Canada bear a disproportionate burden of disease and experience poorer health outcomes as compared to non-Indigenous populations within Canada; these conditions are said to be mediated and exacerbated by pervasive and uninterrupted anti-Indigenous racism. Third and fourth-year medical students at a Canadian medical school were asked to reflect on their experiences working with Indigenous patients in clinical settings, and how their preclinical Indigenous health curriculum impacted these experiences. METHOD: Phenomenology was used, guided by Goffman's theory of social stigma. Eleven undergraduate medical students were recruited using purposeful sampling. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted to gain an in-depth understanding of the participants' experiences. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using the four main processes for phenomenological analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from students' descriptions of clinical experiences involving Indigenous patients: 1) students describe how their Indigenous patients encounter the health care system and their own lack of cultural sensitivity in this context; 2) racism was evident in students' clinical interactions with Indigenous patients, but students do not always perceive these biases nor the impact of this on patient care; 3) identifying the impact of racism on care is complicated by situational clinical encounters; and 4) practicality of preclinical Indigenous health education is desired by students to prepare them for working with Indigenous patients in the clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: In their clinical experiences, students witness racism against Indigenous peoples yet are unprepared to stand up against it. Findings highlight the importance of enhancing undergraduate medical training to allow students to better understand the unique experiences and perspectives of Indigenous patients. The results support the need for ongoing Indigenous health education, to foster culturally sensitive experiences while learning about Indigenous patients.

Critical ethnography: implications for medical education research and scholarship.

CONTEXT: Medical education (ME) must rethink the dominant culture's fundamental assumptions and unintended consequences on less advantaged groups and society at large. Doing so, however, requires a robust understanding of what we are teaching, regardless of our intentions, and what is being learned across the multiple settings that our learners find themselves in, from classrooms to clinical spaces and beyond. APPROACH: Gaining such understandings and fully exploring the extent to which we are rising to the challenges of today's society in authentic ways require robust methodologies. In this research approaches paper, we introduce unfamiliar readers to one such methodology-critical ethnography. By doing so, we hope to demonstrate its potential for helping ME both identify and gain novel insight into necessary solutions for many of today's educational challenges regarding healthcare disparities and inequities. CONCLUSION: The readers of this paper will gain novel insights into how critical ethnographers see the world and ask questions, thereby changing the way they (the reader) see the world. At its heart, critical ethnography is about thinking differently and that is something that should be accessible to all. Doing so may also enhance our ability to both question dominant ways of thinking and, ultimately, to enact positive change in training and practices to enhance inclusivity and fairness for all regardless of their gender, race and status.

Twelve tips for how institutional ethnography (IE) is conducted in health professions education research.

Institutional ethnography (IE), a term coined by sociologist Dorothy Smith, explores the nuances of institutions and their complex relationships in sociology. IE is an approach to studying and analysing social organization, and it provides a more holistic understanding of 'invisible' relationships that govern institutions and how those relationships interact with each other. Health sciences researchers in patient care, patient experience, and allied health professionals have recently become more interested in the use of this methodology and how to incorporate it into their research. However, in health professions education (HPE) there is little use of IE. We hypothesize this may be because of limited practical knowledge of this methodology. This paper serves as an introduction to the use of IE in HPE, describing the differences between IE and traditional ethnographies, recognizing the common pitfalls when utilising IE, and incorporating texts into IE. While ethnographies may be daunting to researchers less familiar with these approaches, the tips in this paper will provide an introduction and help educators and researchers successfully navigate the use of IE in health profession scholarship and education.

Miracles in medicine: A narrative inquiry exploring extraordinary events in pediatrics.

Background and Aims: Whether miracles are seen as a source of conflict between healthcare teams and families, a foolish or even harmful belief, or a hindrance to system-wide improvements and scientific inquiry, miracles within medicine have long been questioned. We were interested in the perspectives of pediatricians on miracles and how that has informed their care of patients. We also sought to explore the intersection and relationship between the medical sciences, faith, and how we view miracles. Methods: Using narrative inquiry as a research methodology, we had conversations and explored the experiences of physicians who work directly within pediatric clinical care. We used purposeful sampling by emailing several pediatricians whom we felt might have been interested in the project and may have had experiences with perceived medical miracles. All conversations were conducted over Zoom and recorded. Results: We conducted one to three conversations with each participant. During our analysis, we identified two threads. First, participants described miracles mostly as favorable and fortuitous events that invoked a sense of wonder due to contextual factors such as geography, access to resources, time in history but also previous experiences and the expectations of the clinician. Second, there is a complex dynamic within and between the medical sciences and the faith commitments of clinicians and families, especially when facing life-limiting or end-of-life illness. Conclusions: The stories that our participants told not only informed their past experiences and how they remembered them but also their present and future experiences. Exploring the topic of medical miracles allowed us to better understand the social discourses that shape our perceptions of miracles, death, and the role of the physician. These stories offer us hope and possibility in a time when we as a medical community may have lost our sense of wonder and the ability to notice miracles.

A scoping review for designing a disability curriculum and its impact for medical students.

Background: There is an increasing need for a standardized undergraduate disability curriculum for medical students to better equip students with the proper training, knowledge, and skills to provide holistic care for individuals with disabilities. Objectives: The aim of this scoping review was to better understand and analyze the current body of literature focusing on best practice for including disability curricula and its impact on undergraduate medical students. Results: Three major components for designing a disability curriculum for undergraduate medical students were obtained from our analysis. The components were: (1) effective teaching strategies, (2) competencies required for disability curriculum, and (3) impact of disability curriculum on medical students. Conclusions: Current literature revealed that exposing medical students to a disability curriculum impacted their overall perceptions about people with disabilities. This allowed them to develop a sense of understanding towards patients with disabilities during their clinical encounters. The effectiveness of a disability curriculum is dependent on the extent to which these interventions are incorporated into undergraduate medical education.

Contexte: On constate un besoin croissant de créer une formation uniforme sur le handicap dans le cadre des études médicales de premier cycle afin de les doter des connaissances et des compétences nécessaires pour prodiguer des soins holistiques aux personnes handicapées. Objectifs: Le but de cette revue de la portée était de mieux cerner la littérature scientifique décrivant les meilleures pratiques pour l'élaboration d'un programme d'enseignement sur le handicap et les incidences d'un tel programme sur les étudiants en médecine de premier cycle. Résultats: Nous avons pu dégager trois éléments principaux dont il convient de tenir compte lors de la conception d'un programme d'enseignement sur le handicap au prédoctorat : (1) l'efficacité des stratégies pédagogiques, (2) les compétences à le cadre de la formation sur le handicap, et (3) les incidences de la formation sur les étudiants. Conclusions: La littérature révèle qu'une formation sur le handicap a des incidences sur la manière générale dont les étudiants en médecine perçoivent les personnes qui en souffrent. Par suite d'une telle formation, les étudiants font davantage preuve de compréhension envers les patients lors de leurs rencontres cliniques. L'efficacité d'une formation sur le handicap dépend du degré de son intégration dans le cursus médical de premier cycle.

Exploring Virtual Teaching Approaches Among Pediatricians During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Virtual Ethnographic Study.

INTRODUCTION: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Canadian postsecondary institutions were forced to rely on online teaching to comply with physical distancing recommendations. This sole reliance on virtual methods to deliver synchronous teaching sessions in medical education was novel. We found little empirical research examining pediatric educators' experiences. Hence, the objective of our study was to describe and gain a deeper understanding of pediatric educators' perspectives, focusing on the research question, "How is synchronous virtual teaching impacting and transforming teaching experiences of pediatricians during a pandemic?" METHODS: A virtual ethnography was conducted guided by an online collaborative learning theory. This approach used both interviews and online field observations to obtain objective descriptions and subjective understandings of the participants' experiences while teaching virtually. Pediatric educators (clinical and academic faculty) from our institution were recruited using purposeful sampling and invited to participate in individual phone interviews and online teaching observations. Data were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Fifteen frontline pediatric teachers from our large Canadian research-intensive university were recruited. Four main themes, with subthemes, emerged: (1) the love/hate relationship with the virtual shift; (2) self-imposed pressure to increase virtual engagement; (3) looking back, moving forward; (4) accelerated adaptation and enhanced collaboration. CONCLUSION: Pediatricians adopted new delivery methods quickly and found many efficiencies and opportunities in this shift. Continued use of virtual teaching will lead to increased collaboration, enhanced student engagement strategies, and blending the advantages of virtual and face-to-face learning.

A Scoping Review of Indigenous Health Curricular Content in Graduate Medical Education.

Background: Graduate medical education is refocusing on the reconciliation process with Indigenous peoples and integrating Indigenous healing practices, cultural humility training, and courses on Indigenous health issues in their curricula. Physicians and all health care workers must be able to recognize, respect, and address the distinct health needs of all Indigenous peoples. Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to explore and describe what exists in the current literature on the impact and challenges associated with Indigenous curricula developed for resident physicians. Methods: The search was conducted using 9 bibliographic databases from inception until April 19, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened for inclusion using Covidence. Three reviewers extracted data and all 3 checked for completeness and accuracy. Results: Eleven reports were included. Our included reports consisted of qualitative research (n=2), commentaries (n=1), special articles (n=3), systematic reviews (n=1), innovation reports (n=1), published abstracts (n=1), and program evaluation papers (n=2). Findings are presented by 3 themes: (1) Misunderstandings and cultural bias toward Indigenous people; (2) Increasing community-driven Indigenous partnerships to create a safe environment; and (3) Challenges in implementing Indigenous health curricula. Conclusions: Themes identified related to Indigenous involvement, culturally competent care, common misconceptions about Indigenous peoples, as well as challenges and barriers to implementing Indigenous curricula for residency programs. A collaborative approach involving stakeholders with training in the community is a viable path forward. But comprehensive program evaluation, a source of stable funding, and further research focusing on effective Indigenous curricula for residents are needed.

International Medical Graduates' perceptions about residency training experience: a qualitative study.

Objectives: To explore International Medical Graduates residents' experiences and perspectives of their residency training program. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at a large research-intensive University. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit 14 International medical graduates. The residents recruited for this study were at different levels in their training ranging from Postgraduate year one to five. Residents interviewed represented seven unique specialties. Each trainee was interviewed, and the data were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis framework was used to conduct the data analysis, resulting in the development of study themes. Results: Our analysis generated six main themes. These themes were related to costly decisions, unspoken expectations, the stigma associated with being an IMG, fears of being an IMG, the strength and resilience of IMGs, and recommen-dations proposed by IMGs for program improvement. Conclusions: In this study, we wanted to explore international residents' experiences with their programs. The experience of each individual international resident is unique. However, in this study, we were able to provide firsthand perceptions of IMGs from a research-intensive university and identified common themes experienced and perceived by our resi-dents. This study's findings may help educate, reduce stigma, and guide the implementation of effective individu-al and systemic support for these trainees. Which in turn will enhance the overall educational experiences for IMGs trainees. Our study found that themes seem to be recur-ring, hence, an urgency to bring about appropriate chang-es, equitable opportunities, and support for IMGs.

Has medical assistance in dying changed end-of-life care in the ICU? A qualitative survey of Canadian intensivists.

PURPOSE: Since 2016, Canada has permitted medical assistance in dying (MAID). Our aims were to understand how Canadian intensivists view MAID and the impact of MAID on end-of-life care in the ICU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study of responses from a 41-item questionnaire. We recruited intensivists and trainees from 11 pediatric ICU programs and 14 adult ICU programs across Canada between December 2019 and May 2020. Two qualitative researchers inductively coded responses and then conducted preliminary thematic analysis. Themes were subsequently refined through group discussion. RESULTS: We obtained 150 complete questionnaires (33% response rate), of which 50% were adult practitioners and 50% pediatric. We identified six main themes including: intensivists have a wide range of opinions on MAID; MAID has not changed ICU practice; and moral distress has a diverse impact on practice. Physicians also discussed the role of provider intent and the importance of treating withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (WLST) as a process to protect patients, families, and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian intensivists hold a wide range of opinions on MAID, but most agree it has not changed ICU practice. Importantly, intensivists also hold differing views on the relevance of physician intent in medical ethics.

Residency training experiences of residents with children: A phenomenological study.

Parenthood during postgraduate medical training has become an increasingly relevant topic in recent years. While previous research has attempted to explore the experiences of residents in a parenting role through surveys and limited qualitative studies, an in depth understanding of the postgraduate training experience of these parent residents has not been clearly described. The optimal means of supporting trainees completing residency while parenting remains unclear. The study aim was to develop a rich understanding of the residency training experience of residents in a parenting role. We conducted 15 semi-structured telephone interviews. Our study population included postgraduate trainees from 9 different programs from a large research-intensive university who were parents upon entry to residency or who became parents during residency training. Transcendental phenomenology was used as a qualitative research methodology, guided by life course theory. Thematic analysis of residents' training experiences revealed the following themes: 1) challenges of being a parent with residency responsibilities; 2) work-life balance; 3) support systems; 4) impact on patient interactions; 5) impact on other interactions; and 6) unspoken expectations. Participants suggested actionable solutions to improve the training experience for residents in a parenting role, which included: 1) family-inclusive events; 2) scheduling flexibility; 3) support for fathers; and 4) optimizing support for breastfeeding mothers. Residents in a parenting role represent a unique postgraduate trainee population. Despite focus on resident wellness, challenges remain for individuals trying to navigate parenthood and residency. This data may be utilized to inform support and strategies to optimize the training experiences of these residents.

Embracing uncertainty: medical student perceptions of a pediatric bootcamp developed in response to mandated changes during the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The start of the COVID-19 pandemic led to both shortened clinical rotations and consequent loss of embedded formal teaching time. In response to these learning gaps, a novel, virtual pediatric bootcamp was developed to provide a consolidated 3-week learning opportunity for clinical medical students. Pre-clinical students were encouraged but not required to participate, given the suspension of clinical patient experiences for all undergraduate medical learners and the uncertainty of when clinical rotations would resume. This group of students were particularly challenged with adapting their learning in response to the pandemic while also preparing to apply their pre-clinical knowledge to solve clinical problems. METHODS: A qualitative thematic analysis was used for this study. Ten semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with second-year medical students to explore their experiences and perceptions of the pediatric bootcamp. The six phases of thematic analysis proposed by Braun and Clark guided data analysis. To ensure rigour, the three aspects of rigour-credibility, transferability and confirmability were utilized throughout the project. RESULTS: Qualitative exploration from semi-structured phone interviews of second-year medical students' perceptions and experiences of this new and unanticipated learning experience revealed four main themes: (a) clinical relevance, describing how students were pushed to think about clinical problems in a new way; (b) timing, which explored conflicts related to competing interests, mental preparedness, and the interval between learning and application; (c) teaching strategies, describing how active learning and interaction were facilitated and challenges that arose; and (d) learning resources, highlighting the curated and accessible resources made available to the students, as well as those resources that learners develop for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: A novel three-week online case-based pediatric bootcamp fostered application of knowledge for clinical reasoning at a time when students were transitioning from preclinical to clinical learning. Students were stretched to balance competing priorities, and the bootcamp curated synchronous and asynchronous learner opportunities while allowing them to reflect on their own learning styles and effective virtual learning strategies. While bootcamps are often used to prepare learners for transitions between clinical stages, our findings suggest the bootcamp format can also facilitate transition from preclinical to clinical roles.

What Is Teamwork? A Mixed Methods Study on the Perception of Teamwork in a Specialized Neonatal Resuscitation Team.

Introduction: Neonatal resuscitation is a team-based activity involving many decisions and tasks. Non-technical factors, such as teamwork, are increasingly recognized as impacting how well-neonatal resuscitation is performed, and therefore influencing infant outcomes. Prior studies on teamwork in neonatal resuscitation have focused on quantification of teamwork behaviors, or the effects of team training. This study aimed to explore healthcare providers' own perception of teamwork in this specialized environment to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to effective team functioning. Methods: This single-center exploratory sequential mixed methods study used two phases. First, semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis used to identify themes. Subsequently, interview data informed the development of quantitative surveys to explore selected themes in the wider team. Results: From ten semi-structured interviews, seven themes were identified including: (1) Team Composition, (2) Effective Communication, (3) Team leadership, (4) Hierarchy, (5) Team Training, (6) Debriefing, and (7) Physical Environment. Perceived teamwork facilitators include role assignment, familiarity, team composition, talking out loud to maintain shared mental models, leadership, and team training. Perceived barriers included time pressures, ad hoc team, ineffective leadership, and space limitations. Selected themes (Communication, Speaking up, Hierarchy, and Leadership) were further explored via electronic surveys distributed via email to all members of the resuscitation team. There were 105 responses; a response rate of ~53%. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that speaking up is important; however, not all felt comfortable doing so. Neonatal fellows (14%) and nurses (12%) were most likely to report not feeling comfortable speaking up. All respondents agreed that team communication is important to an effective resuscitation. Most respondents (91.5%) agreed that a hierarchy exists within the team; 54.3% believed that hierarchy positively contributes to effective resuscitation. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that having a clearly defined leader is important in delivery room resuscitations. Ineffective leadership was the most cited reason for poor team communication. Conclusions: In this mixed methods study of perceptions of teamwork within a specialized, multi-disciplinary neonatal resuscitation team, communication, hierarchy, and leadership were positively perceived and facilitates teamwork. However, even in this environment, some nurses and trainees expressed discomfort with speaking up.

Impact of social pediatrics rotation on residents' understanding of social determinants of health.

Social Pediatrics is the newest mandatory rotation in the General Pediatrics residency program at the University of Alberta. Evaluation of the residents include a written reflective assignment, asking them to identify assets and disparities that have influenced the health of a child encountered on the rotation. While there are many published papers on reflective writing , few papers are found in the area of how social determinants of health (SDoH) impact an individual's overall health. This study examines the question: how has exploring SDoH during the Social Pediatrics rotation led to changes in residents' awareness of their own practice of pediatrics? Grounded theory was used to analyse 35 reflections from residents who had submitted them as a mandatory assignment at the end of their rotation. In addition, 10 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted to further understand residents' perceptions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysis of the reflections and interviews was guided by grounded theory using open, axial, and selective coding. Analyses of written reflections revealed the following categories: 1) judgment/bias, 2) systemic challenges, 3) advocacy, and 4) a sense that everyone is doing their best. Interview data reinforced overlapping categories of bias, systemic challenges and advocacy in addition to two new categories: 1) increased exposure and knowledge of specific disadvantaged populations, and 2) understanding impact of SDoH on overall health.Categories that were generated highlight the importance of residents' education regarding the role of SDoH on overall health and management plans. They became aware of structural determinants of health working with health-care professionals who were advocates for the communities they worked with. Analysis of residents' written reflection assignments and follow-up interviews revealed the value of reflective practice in physician development and reinforced the benefit of fostering experiences not typically encountered in traditional clinical learning environments.

Difficulties with Learning Musculoskeletal Physical Examination Skills: Student Perspectives and General Lessons Learned for Curricular Design.

Phenomenon: The development of foundational clinical skills, such as physical examination, is essential to becoming a competent clinician. Musculoskeletal medicine is often considered a specialized area of practice despite the high prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in the general population and presenting to general clinical practices. Prior work has shown that medical learners and practicing clinicians have low confidence in these skills but understanding of the student perspective on why these skills are more difficult to acquire is unclear.Approach: Our study was guided by social constructivist learning theory to explore the learner experience and present their perspectives. Qualitative analysis investigated the difference between learning musculoskeletal physical examination versus other body systems, using the voices from 11 semi-structured focus group interviews. Participants included third-year medical students across two academic cohorts at one institution. Our analysis was grounded in the principles of phenomenology and used triangulation and reflexivity to provide rigorous analysis.Findings: Students provided rich and insightful perspectives regarding their experiences in learning musculoskeletal physical examination techniques. Four themes were developed from our data: a) the need for opportunities for both supervised and self-directed practice; b) assessment and competence as motivations for learning; c) the need for a different approach to the content and structure of musculoskeletal medicine and its associated examination techniques; and d) the need for distinct expertise and technical skill from musculoskeletal examination teachers.Insights: This study provides a valuable lens to critically reflect on existing curriculum and pedagogical approaches to musculoskeletal examination skills. Lessons from this study may be applicable to curriculum design in general, especially the teaching of physical examination skills, such as how it is taught and integrated with other content (including anatomy), how much practice is required, who teaches physical examination skills, and what faculty development is needed to standardize teaching. Promoting a learner-centered approach to the teaching and learning of these clinical skills will be beneficial to all stakeholders, especially to our future physicians and their patients.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1954930 .

Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers.

OBJECTIVES: There has been increasing interest in the management of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (SwD). Its prevalence, particularly in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs), is underappreciated. As the standard diagnostic tests are either invasive or scarce, valid parent-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires could play a pivotal role in the understanding and managing SwD in this group. This article reviewed the literature on PRO questionnaires pertaining to SwD in OHITs. DATA SOURCE: A librarian searched Prospero, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, HaPI, CINAHL, and SCOPUS until February 2021 using the MeSH terms for deglutition and screening methods. REVIEW METHOD: Questionnaires that examined disease-specific or eating and feeding concerns or difficulties were excluded. Two reviewers independently identified PRO questionnaires for SwD that were used in OHITs and extracted the author names, publication year, questionnaire name, the studied population, and the reported psychometric assessments. A quality assessment was performed based on consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and updated criteria for good measurement properties. RESULTS: Of the 3488 screened articles, we identified only two questionnaires, the pediatric version of the Eating Assessment Tool (PEDI-EAT-10) and the PRO questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in OHITs. The PEDI-EAT-10 authors assessed the validity and reliability on children with cerebral palsy. However, concerns were identified regarding the developmental process and the internal structure validity. The PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs meets criteria but has not yet been validated in the population of interest nor its psychometric properties assessed. CONCLUSION: Two instruments were identified. The PED-EAT-10 exhibits methodological flaws, while Edmonton PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs awaits construct validation and could fill the current knowledge gap.

Exploring resident perceptions of initial competency based medical education implementation.

BACKGROUND: Competence by design (CBD) is a nationally developed hybrid competency based medical education (CBME) curricular model that focuses on residents' abilities to promote successful practice and better meet societal needs. CBD is based on a commonly used framework of five core components of CBME: outcome competencies, sequenced progression, tailored learning experiences, competency-focused instruction and programmatic assessment. There is limited literature concerning residents' perceptions of implementation of CBME. OBJECTIVE: We explored resident perceptions of this transformation and their views as they relate to the intended framework. METHODS: We recruited residents enrolled in current CBME implementation between August 2018 and January 2019. We interviewed residents representing eight disciplines from the initial two CBME implementation cohorts. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data through iterative consensus building until saturation. RESULTS: We identified five themes: 1) Value of feedback for residents; 2) Resident strategies for successful Entrustable Professional Activity observation completion; 3) Residents experience challenges; 4) Resident concerns regarding CBME; and 5) Resident recommendations to improve existing challenges. We found that while there was clear alignment with residents' perceptions of the programmatic assessment core CBME component, alignment was not as clear for other components. CONCLUSIONS: Residents perceived aspects of this transformation as helpful but overall had mixed perceptions and variable understanding of the intended underlying framework. Understanding and disseminating successes and challenges from the resident lens may assist programs at different stages of CBME implementation.

CONTEXTE: La « Compétence par conception ¼ (CPC) est un modèle hybride pour les cursus formation médicale fondée sur les compétences (FMFC) développé à l'échelle nationale, qui met l'accent sur les capacités des résidents à promouvoir une pratique médicale réussie et à mieux répondre aux besoins de la société. La CPC repose sur un cadre couramment utilisé de cinq composantes essentielles de la FMFC : les compétences en matière de résultats, la progression séquentielle, les expériences d'apprentissage sur mesure, l'enseignement axé sur les compétences et l'évaluation programmatique. Il y a peu d'études sur les perceptions des résidents quant à la mise en oeuvre de la FMFC. OBJECTIF: Nous avons recueilli les perceptions des résidents en lien avec cette transformation du cursus ainsi que leur point de vue sur le cadre prévu de celui-ci. MÉTHODES: Nous avons recruté des résidents qui étaient inscrits dans un programme en cours de mise en œuvre de la FMFC entre août 2018 et janvier 2019. Les résidents interrogés des deux premières cohortes de mise en œuvre de la FMFC représentaient huit disciplines. Les données ont fait l'objet d'une analyse thématique inductive par la recherche itérative d'un consensus jusqu'à saturation. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons identifié cinq thèmes : 1) la valeur de la rétroaction pour les résidents; 2) les stratégies des résidents pour la réussite des activités professionnelles confiables; 3) difficultés éprouvées par les résidents; 4) les préoccupations des résidents concernant la FMFC; et 5) les recommandations des résidents pour palier aux difficultés existantes. Nous avons constaté que s'il y avait une correspondance claire entre les perceptions des résidents et la composante centrale de la FMFC qu'est l'évaluation programmatique, la correspondance n'était pas aussi évidente pour les autres composantes. CONCLUSIONS: Les résidents ont perçu certains aspects du nouveau modèle comme étant utiles, mais dans l'ensemble, leurs perceptions étaient mitigées et leur compréhension de son cadre sous-jacent était variable. La compréhension et le partage de la vision des résidents quant aux succès et défis du modèle peuvent être utiles aux programmes à diverses étapes de la mise en œuvre de la FMFC.

What are parents' perceptions related to barriers in diagnosing swallowing dysfunction in children? A grounded theory approach.

OBJECTIVES: Swallowing dysfunction (SwD) is under-reported in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs). The identification of parental perceptions of factors that may hinder the diagnosis could help clinicians manage these children in a more expeditious manner. This study investigated the barriers to diagnosing SwD, as reported by the families. DESIGN: Grounded theory study. SETTING: This study was performed in a tertiary care paediatric centre in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of OHITs were recruited using purposeful sampling. INTERVENTION: We used detailed, semistructured, in-person interviews and the audiotapes and transcriptions were thematically analysed. From the parental insights, we built a framework composed of three themes of barriers. RESULT: Ten parents of OHITs with SwD were interviewed. The children presented with recurrent coughing, choking, cold-like symptoms, recurring/consistent illnesses and feeding difficulties. They were managed with multiple rounds of antibiotics and diagnosed with allergies, asthma or recurrent viral infections before considering SwD. The three emerging themes are false beliefs about SwD among parents and some physicians, parent-related barriers and physician-related barriers. These barriers had severely impacted the parents, impairing work productivity and leading to work-related reprimands and changes in the family dynamics. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there are several barriers that face the parents of OHITs when seeking a diagnosis of SwD and initiating appropriate management. These barriers likely interact with one another and amplify their effects on the family and the child. A common denominator is a lack of education regarding SwD, its clinical manifestations and the available expertise to manage this condition.

Parent-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in Healthy Infants and Toddlers: Construction and Content Validation.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited epidemiological information on swallowing dysfunction (SwD) in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs). Cost, invasiveness, expertise, and resources constrain the repeatability and utility of instrumental diagnostic tests. A parent-reported outcomes (PRO) tool has the potential to mitigate these disadvantages. Hence, we set out to develop and validate a novel PRO tool to assess SwD in OHITs. STUDY DESIGN: A mixed-method study. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric center. METHODS: We recruited parents of OHITs with SwD and excluded those with a confounding diagnosis (syndromes or neurological impairment). Interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed to extract the relevant domains and items. A similar analytical method was performed on the reports from a systematic review and literature search. Four verification sessions of parents and experts were conducted to maintain rigor. A panel of experts assessed and established the content validity of the items using a modified Delphi technique. RESULTS: We achieved information saturation after interviewing 10 parents and generated 7 domains with 72 items. Over the course of 3 rounds of modified Delphi content validation, the domains were reduced to 3 (swallowing, breathing, and illness) containing 21 items; a content validity index of 82.1% was achieved. CONCLUSION: We validated the content of a new PRO instrument to assess SwD in OHITs. The instrument is composed of 3 primary domains representing 21 items. This tool has the potential to screen for swallowing dysfunction and can assess management outcomes specifically for this population at a community level.

Experiences of Faculty Members Giving Corrective Feedback to Medical Trainees in a Clinical Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Imperative to medical training is the observation and provision of feedback. In this era of competency-based medical education, feedback is one of the core components of this new model. A better understanding of the medical faculty's attitudes and experiences when providing feedback is essential. Currently, there are limited qualitative studies that have explored attitudes and experiences of faculty members when giving corrective feedback to medical trainees. METHODS: To allow an in-depth exploration of this phenomenon, a hermeneutics phenomenology approach was used, by conducting semistructured interviews with 10 faculty members representing six disciplines and used thematic analysis to create data-driven codes and identify key themes through an iterative consensus-building process. RESULTS: Four themes were identified by the authors: (1) Elements of effective feedback, (2) Faculty members' perception of giving corrective feedback, (3) Challenges as it relates to the assessment culture of the institution, and (4) Providing effective corrective feedback as a mutual process focused on relationship building between learners and preceptors. DISCUSSION: By exploring faculty members' perceptions of providing perceived corrective feedback, we identified actionable recommendations based on the study participants' experiences, expectations, and challenges which could be addressed involving future faculty development with the focus on modifying concepts of feedback and institutional changes that will promote an attitudinal and a cultural shift.