A phase I trial of topotecan and gemcitabine administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks to patients with advanced tumors.

BACKGROUND: The complementary action of gemcitabine and topotecan on DNA metabolism suggested the potential for their use in combination chemotherapy. Gemcitabine, a synthetic cytidine analogue chain terminator, and topotecan, a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, have been reported to have broad antitumor activity and are approved for clinical use. METHODS: The cytotoxicity of the combination in various models in vitro was additive. In the current study, the authors conducted a Phase I study to determine the recommended Phase II doses and toxicity profile of gemcitabine and topotecan when administered weekly in combination. Gemcitabine (400--1000 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously over 30 minutes followed by a 15-minute infusion of topotecan (0.75--2.5 mg/m(2)) weekly for 3 consecutive weeks in a 4-week treatment cycle. Thirty-eight patients with advanced refractory solid tumors and good performance status were treated. RESULTS: Myelosuppression in the form of granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Other toxic effects included anemia, nausea, and elevated hepatic transaminases. Partial responses were observed in two patients (one with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and one with pancreatic carcinoma). Disease stabilization occurred in five patients (three with pancreatic carcinoma, one with rectal carcinoma, and one with metastatic carcinoma of an unknown primary site). Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2), and topotecan, 2.5 mg/m(2), were the maximum tolerated doses for this combination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study showed that the combination of weekly gemcitabine and topotecan for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle schedule appeared to be well tolerated and was associated with clinical activity. Therefore, this combination is recommended for a further Phase II evaluation.

Determinants of postembolization syndrome after hepatic chemoembolization.

PURPOSE: Postembolization syndrome (PES) occurs in the majority of patients undergoing hepatic chemoembolization, and is the major reason for hospitalization after the procedure. The ability to identify which groups of patients are at increased or decreased risk of PES would be useful to better counsel patients, to minimize toxicity, and to plan inpatient versus outpatient therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy hepatic chemoembolization procedures were performed in 29 patients using cytotoxic drugs mixed with Ethiodol and polyvinyl alcohol. The following procedural variables were retrospectively assessed and evaluated for association with PES and length of postprocedural hospitalization: gallbladder embolization, lobe embolized, percentage liver volume embolized, percentage embolized volume occupied by tumor, previous embolization of the same territory, and dose of chemoembolic emulsion. Logistic regression was used to quantify the relative effect of each procedural variable. RESULTS: Gallbladder embolization and dose administered were associated with an increased risk of PES and an extended hospitalization, with odds ratios of 2.8 and 3.0, and 3.0 and 4.6, respectively. Previous embolization was associated with a decreased risk of both PES and extended hospitalization, with odds ratios of 0.5 and 0.4, respectively. There was a statistical trend toward significance for gallbladder embolization (P = .06), dose administered (P = .07), and previous embolization (P = .14). CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant predictors of the severity of PES and length of postprocedural hospitalization may exist. Avoiding embolization of the gallbladder reduces the risk of PES. Re-embolization of previously treated vessels is associated with decreased toxicity and may assist in selecting patients for treatment on an outpatient basis, especially when a reduced dose is required.

Phase II trial of topotecan in advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of topotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, was conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas to determine the activity and toxicity of topotecan. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: 35 patients, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d for five days intravenously and repeated every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response after 3 cycles. Those with either clinical response or stable disease received additional cycles of the drug until toxicity developed or disease progression occurred. RESULTS: Among 30 patients evaluable for response there were no complete responses and 3 partial responses (10%) for a total response rate of 10% (95% confidence interval = 0-20.6%). Stable disease for at least eight weeks was seen in 11 patients (36%). Median survival was 19 weeks (95% confidence interval 11 to 26 weeks). Therapy was generally well tolerated, with reversible granulocytopenia being the most common toxicity. CONCLUSION: Topotecan given on a 5 day, short infusion schedule, demonstrated limited activity in pancreatic carcinoma with minimal toxicity. Further exploration of topotecan in pancreatic carcinoma using different dosing schedules is warranted.