Methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: utility for prenatal diagnosis of parental origin in human triploidy.

OBJECTIVE: When a triploid pregnancy is diagnosed prenatally, gynaecologists have traditionally relied on the histopathological examination of the tissue from the terminated pregnancy to determine if the pregnancy is molar. However, reproducibility is poor and variability is high when diagnosing hydatidiform moles. Triploid pregnancies can have either the chromosomal constitution of two maternal and one paternal set, or two paternal and one maternal set, but only the conceptuses with two paternal sets have the potential to cause maternal complications. Therefore, it would be beneficial to introduce a method that gives the gynaecologist the parental origin of the genome of the triploid conceptus as early as possible, without delaying the process by first collecting parental samples. METHODS: Using methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, we measured methylation levels at different imprinted sites. RESULTS: We were able to correctly determine the parental origin of the genome in all 105 triploid pregnancies analysed. CONCLUSIONS: We present methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as a method capable of determining the parental origin of the genome of triploid conceptuses within 24 h; it is inexpensive, simple and easy to use, and parental samples are not needed.

The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies (mAb) in metastatic colorectal cancer seems limited to KRAS wild-type (wt) tumours, but still a major fraction of KRASwt patients are nonresponders and supplementary selection criteria are needed. We investigated methodological aspects of KRAS testing and the predictive and prognostic value of KRAS status combined with three EGFR-related gene polymorphisms [single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] in patients treated with cetuximab and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 71 patients referred to third-line cetuximab-irinotecan. Blood samples were analysed for SNPs. KRAS analysis was carried out by sequencing analysis and quantitative PCR (DxS kit) in primary tumour and distant metastases. RESULTS: There was a clear correlation between KRAS status in primary tumours and metastasis. The DxS kit presented the highest sensitivity. Response was confined to KRASwt patients (40% response rate versus 0%, P < 0.1(-3)), which translated into a significant difference in PFS. The EGF61A>G polymorphism showed relation to clinical outcome. A combined biomarker analysis showed a 19% progression rate in KRASwt-EGF61 homozygote patients and 60% in the EGF61A/G patients (P = 0.006) and a significant increase in overall survival (17.1 versus 5.9 months, log-rank, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The combined biomarker analysis maybe an attractive approach to selection of patients for third-line treatment including anti-EGFR mAbs.

Decreased cisplatin/DNA adduct formation is associated with cisplatin resistance in human head and neck cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between cisplatin sensitivity, intracellular glutathione, and platinum/DNA adduct formation (measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy) in a series of seven head and neck cancer cell lines, and to evaluate the effect of biochemical modulation of glutathione on platinum/DNA adduct formation and repair. METHODS: Cisplatin/DNA adducts were measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Glutathione content was measured by enzymatic assay and was modulated with buthionine sulfoximine. Apoptosis was measured by double-labeled flow cytometry. RESULTS: Intracellular glutathione concentration was strongly correlated with cisplatin resistance (P = 0.002, R2 = 0.7). There was also a statistically significant inverse correlation between cisplatin/DNA adduct formation and the IC50 for cisplatin in these cell lines. (P = 0.0004, R2 = 0.67). In addition, resistant cells were able to repair approximately 70% of cisplatin/DNA adducts at 24 h, while sensitive cells repaired less than 28% of adducts in the same period. However, despite the positive correlation between cellular glutathione and cisplatin resistance, there was no direct correlation between intracellular glutathione concentration and platinum/DNA adduct formation. Further, depletion of intracellular glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine did not dramatically alter formation of cisplatin/DNA adducts even though it resulted in marked increase in cisplatin cytotoxicity and was associated with increased apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that glutathione has multiple effects not directly related to formation of cisplatin/DNA adducts, but may also be an important determinant of the cell's ability to repair cisplatin-induced DNA damage and resist apoptosis.

Prognostic value of c-erbB2 and other markers in patients treated with chemotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is widely used in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, but no clear markers are available that can predict response to treatment or survival in these patients. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients evaluated in this study had recurrent head and neck squamous carcinomas, previously treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients received either cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (n = 15) or cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol) (n = 14). Expression of c-erbB2, p53, glutathione S-transferase pi, multidrug resistance-associated protein, thymidylate synthase, and glutathione synthetase were evaluated in biopsy tissues. RESULTS: Response to chemotherapy was significantly correlated with improved survival (progression-free survival, p =.0005; overall survival, p =. 007). Of the factors examined, expression of c-erbB2 was associated with significantly decreased progression-free survival (p =.023) and overall survival (p =.029). This was seen in patients treated with cisplatin/taxol but not in patients treated with cisplatin/5-FU. CONCLUSION: Expression of c-erbB2 may be a clinically useful predictor of survival in this group of patients.

Prognostic value of p53, glutathione S-transferase pi, and thymidylate synthase for neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been widely used in the last decade for organ preservation or unresectable disease in advanced stage head and neck cancer. We examined the expression of a series of tumor markers that have been associated with chemotherapy resistance in pretreatment biopsies from 68 patients who received cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy at either of two institutions. Patients received either cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (n = 49) or cisplatin/paclitaxel (n = 19). Expression of p53, glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTpi), thymidylate synthase (TS), c-erbB2, and multidrug resistance-associated protein was examined by immunohistochemistry. Expression of glutathione synthetase mRNA was measured by in situ hybridization. The overall response rate for cisplatin-based neoadjuvant treatment was 79%. The expression of several of the tumor markers was associated with resistance to neoadjuvant treatment, but none reached statistical significance. Overall survival (OS) was strongly correlated with the absence of p53 expression. The OS at 3 years was 81% in the p53-negative group, whereas it was 30% in the p53-positive group for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.0001). Expression of GST pi and TS was also significantly correlated with decreased OS after neoadjuvant treatment. At 3 years, the OS rate was 82% in the low GSTpi score group, compared to 46% in the high GSTpi score group (P = 0.0018). In the TS-negative group, the 3-year OS rate was 71% compared with 40% in the TS-positive group (P = 0.0071). We conclude that p53, GSTpi, and TS may be clinically important predictors of survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Paracrine/autocrine regulation of breast cancer by the insulin-like growth factors.

Local environmental signals regulate the growth and development of both normal and malignant breast epithelium. Members of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family likely influence both of these processes. The localization of IGF2 to stroma specifically surrounding malignant breast epithelium indicates that this growth factor may play a critical role in the genesis or maintenance of this transformed phenotype. Recent studies have sought to understand the mechanism by which IGF2 expressing fibroblasts are localized to the periphery of malignant breast cancer cells. In addition, the consequences of the expression of IGF-signaling components likely expand beyond their direct effects on mitogenesis. Indirect effects predominantly associated with the IGF2 receptor could also influence the invasive potential of breast tumor cells.

Glutathione content but not gamma glutamyl cysteine synthetase mRNA expression predicts cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE: To correlate cellular glutathione content and gamma-glutamyl cysteine synthetase (gamma GCS) mRNA expression with cisplatin sensitivity in a panel of seven head and neck squamous cancer cell lines. METHODS: Cisplatin IC50 was determined for each cell line using a sodium tetreazolium (XTT) assay. Cellular glutathione content was measured by using a previously reported enzymic method. gamma GCS mRNA expression was measured using an RNase protection assay. RESULTS: Total cellular glutathione was an excellent predictor of cisplatin sensitivity in this series of cell lines. The IC50 for cisplatin in the cell line with the highest glutathione concentration was approximately 90 times higher than in the cell line with the lowest glutathione concentration. Regression analysis showed a highly statistically significant positive correlation between cisplatin IC50 and cellular glutathione (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.81, P = 0.0012). Some-what surprisingly, in contrast to previous studies in ovarian cancer, gamma GCS mRNA expression in these cell lines was not significantly predictive of either total cellular glutathione or cisplatin sensitivity (R2 = 0.005, P = 0.84). As expected, treatment of resistant cell lines with buthionine sulfoximine resulted in decreased cellular glutathione and enhanced cisplatin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that glutathione may be an important determinant of cisplatin sensitivity in clinical head and neck cancer. Since cisplatin is the most active chemotherapy drug for the treatment of this disease, this correlation may have important clinical relevance. The lack of correlation between glutathione level and gamma GCS expression suggests that salvage or alternate synthetic pathways may be critical in these cells.

Immunohistochemical staining for glutathione S-transferase predicts response to platinum-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) play an important role in the cell's defense against toxic substances. The GSTs are a family of enzymes produced by several genes that interact with distinct but overlapping substrates and that may play a role in resistance of tumor cells to several chemotherapeutic agents. We examined the correlation between expression of GSTs determined by immunohistochemistry and clinical response to platinum-based chemotherapy in 51 patients with head and neck cancer, who received a total of 56 courses of chemotherapy. The overall response rate for the 56 chemotherapy treatment courses was 48%. The overall response rate (complete response + partial response) for patients with low GST scores was 88% (21 of 24), whereas among the patients with high GST scores, the overall response rate was 19% (6 of 32; P = 0.001). Patients with a low GST score were 4.7 times more likely to respond to chemotherapy than patients with high GST scores. GST scores corresponded to response in 84% of cases. Among 23 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the overall response rate for patients with low GST scores was 100% (14 of 14), whereas among the patients with high GST scores, the overall response rate was 44% (4 of 9; P = 0.002). Among 33 patients treated with chemotherapy for relapsed disease, the overall response rate for patients with low GST scores was 70% (7 of 10), whereas among the patients with high GST scores, the overall response rate was 8.6% (2 of 23; P < 0.001). We conclude that GST expression correlates well with response to platinum-based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

The effects of lumbosacral support belts and abdominal muscle strength on functional lifting ability in healthy women.

STUDY DESIGN: This study focused on lumbosacral support belts, abdominal muscle strength, and lifting ability in healthy women. Subjects underwent manual muscle testing to determine muscle strength and performed lifting procedures to determine lifting capacity. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is threefold: 1) to determine the effectiveness of lumbosacral support belts in improving lifting ability in healthy women, 2) to determine if lumbosacral support belts are more effective for those with weak abdominals than those with strong abdominals, and 3) to determine if the maximum amount of weight varies with abdominal muscle strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In a review of published literature, one study has addressed the relationship of lumbosacral support belts and lifting capacity. However, no study has examined the use of lumbosacral support belts and lifting capacity in a female population. METHODS: A convenient sample of 69 healthy women, aged 20 to 40 years, participated in this study. Subjects were categorized into one of three groups based on lower and upper abdominal muscle strength. Each subject then performed two lifting procedures, one with a lumbosacral support belt and one without, to determine two maximum lifts. RESULTS: Women between the ages of 20 and 40 years could lift approximately 1.0 kg more weight from the floor to waist height with the lumbosacral support belt. The maximum weight lifted varied with abdominal strength. Lumbosacral support belts were not more effective for those with weak abdominals than those with strong abdominals. CONCLUSIONS: When applied properly and used in conjunction with proper lifting technique, lumbosacral support belts slightly improved lifting ability in healthy women. The magnitude of the increase, although statistically significant, is not sufficient to advocate the use of lumbosacral support belts to increase lifting capacity.