Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer ; 27(2): 266-276, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor (ER) degrader used as monotherapy and combination therapy for ER positive HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) in postmenopausal women. The drug response predictor (DRP), is a mathematical algorithm based on the expression of multiple genes in the tumour. The fulvestrant DRP algorithm has previously shown effect in BC. In this study, we investigated the DRP's potential in predicting fulvestrant benefit. METHOD: Among 695 patients with ABC prospectively included in a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort we retrospectively included 226 patients who received fulvestrant as monotherapy. The DRP result was based on mRNA extracted from tumour biopsies and analysed using Affymetrix array. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: For patients who received fulvestrant in line one to four and were previously unexposed to adjuvant endocrine therapy, we identified a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (90% confidence interval (90% CI) upper limit of 1.08, one sided p = 0.066) for a predicted positive vs negative outcome. A weaker association was seen when including patients exposed to adjuvant endocrine treatment or received fulvestrant in fifth or later lines. Exploratory analyses showed that the DRP was efficient when using recent biopsies for DRP estimate and among recently treated patients. CONCLUSION: The DRP showed a potential in predicting fulvestrant treatment but was not significant in the overall analysis. Use of older biopsies, long-term endocrine treatment and multiple therapies between biopsy used for analysis and fulvestrant treatment, probably affect the predictive accuracy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Fulvestrant/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Female , Fulvestrant/adverse effects , Fulvestrant/therapeutic use , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 172(2): 391-400, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099635

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Anthracyclines remain a cornerstone in the treatment of primary and advanced breast cancer (BC). This study has evaluated the predictive value of a multigene mRNA-based drug response predictor (DRP) in the treatment of advanced BC with epirubicin. The DRP is a mathematical method combining in vitro sensitivity and gene expression with clinical genetic information from > 3000 clinical tumor samples. METHODS: From a DBCG cohort, 140 consecutive patients were treated with epirubicin between May 1997 and November 2016. After patient informed consent, mRNA was isolated from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary breast tumor tissue and analyzed using Affymetrix arrays. Using time to progression (TTP) as primary endpoint, the efficacy of epirubicin was analyzed according to DRP combined with clinicopathological data collected retrospectively from patients' medical records. Statistical analysis was done using Cox proportional hazards model stratified by treatment line. RESULTS: Median TTP was 9.3 months. The DRP was significantly associated to TTP (P = 0.03). The hazard ratio for DRP scores differing by 50 percentage points was 0.55 (95% CI -0.93, one-sided). A 75% DRP was associated with a median TTP of 13 months compared to 7 months following a 25% DRP. Multivariate analysis showed that DRP was independent of age and number of metastases. CONCLUSION: The current study prospectively validates the predictive capability of DRP regarding epirubicin previously shown retrospectively allowing the patients predicted to be poor responders to choose more effective alternatives. Randomized prospective studies are needed to demonstrate if such an approach will lead to increased overall survival.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Pharmacological , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Precision Medicine , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 14(3): 804-10, 2008 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18245542

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the novel hydroxamate histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat (previously named PXD101) in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sequential dose-escalating cohorts of three to six patients received belinostat administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetic variables were evaluated at all dose levels. Pharmacodynamic measurements included acetylation of histones extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, caspase-dependent cleavage of cytokeratin-18, and interleukin-6 levels. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received belinostat at one of six dose levels (150-1,200 mg/m(2)/d). Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 fatigue (one patient at 600 mg/m(2); one patient at 1,200 mg/m(2)), grade 3 diarrhea combined with fatigue (one patient at 1,200 mg/m(2)), grade 3 atrial fibrillation (one patient at 1,200 mg/m(2); one patient at 1,000 mg/m(2)), and grade 2 nausea/vomiting leading to inability to complete a full 5-day cycle (two patients at 1,000 mg/m(2)). The maximum tolerated dose was 1,000 mg/m(2)/d. I.v. belinostat displayed linear pharmacokinetics with respect to C(max) and AUC. The intermediate elimination half-life was 0.3 to 1.3 h and was independent of dose. Histone H4 hyperacetylation was observed after each infusion and was sustained for 4 to 24 h in a dose-dependent manner. Increases in interleukin-6 levels were detected following belinostat treatment. Stable disease was observed in a total of 18 (39%) patients, including 15 treated for > or =4 cycles, and this was associated with caspase-dependent cleavage of cytokeratin-18. Of the 24 patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose (1,000 mg/m(2)/d), 50% achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: I.v. belinostat is well tolerated, exhibits dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects, and has promising antitumor activity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Enzyme Inhibitors/toxicity , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors , Histone Deacetylases/pharmacokinetics , Hydroxamic Acids/toxicity , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Life Expectancy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Selection , Sulfonamides
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...