Family history of arthritis, osteoporosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome and risk of these conditions among U.S. adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to estimate odds ratios of associations between family history of arthritis, osteoporosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome and prevalence in a real-world population, uncovering family histories of related conditions that may increase risk due to shared heritability, condition pathophysiology, or social/environmental factors. METHODS: Using data from 156,307 participants in the All of Us (AoU) Research Program, we examined associations between self-reported first-degree family history of 5 common types of arthritis (fibromyalgia, gout, osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)), osteoporosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome and prevalence. We evaluate associations across 7 conditions and performed stratified analyses by race and ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic differences, body mass index, and type of affected relative. RESULTS: Over 38% of AoU participants reported a family history of any arthritis, osteoporosis, or carpal tunnel syndrome. Adults with a family history of any arthritis, osteoporosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome exhibited 3.68 to 7.59 (4.90, on average) odds of having the same condition, and 0.70 to 2.10 (1.24, on average) odds of having a different condition. The strongest associations observed were between family history of OA and prevalence of OA (OR 7.59, 95%CI 7.32-7.88), and family history of SLE and prevalence of SLE (OR 6.34, 95%CI 5.17-7.74). We additionally uncover race and ethnicity and sex disparities in family history associations. CONCLUSION: Family history of several related conditions was associated with increased risk for arthritis, osteoporosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome, underscoring the importance of family history of related conditions for primary prevention.

A comprehensive genome-wide cross-trait analysis of sexual factors and uterine leiomyoma.

Age at first sexual intercourse (AFS) and lifetime number of sexual partners (NSP) may influence the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma (UL) through their associations with hormonal concentrations and uterine infections. Leveraging summary statistics from large-scale genome-wide association studies conducted in European ancestry for each trait (NAFS = 214,547; NNSP = 370,711; NUL = 302,979), we observed a significant negative genomic correlation for UL with AFS (rg = -0.11, P = 7.83×10-4), but not with NSP (rg = 0.01, P = 0.62). Four specific genomic regions were identified as contributing significant local genetic correlations to AFS and UL, including one genomic region further identified for NSP and UL. Partitioning SNP-heritability with cell-type-specific annotations, a close clustering of UL with both AFS and NSP was identified in immune and blood-related components. Cross-trait meta-analysis revealed 15 loci shared between AFS/NSP and UL, including 7 novel SNPs. Univariable two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis suggested no evidence for a causal association between genetically predicted AFS/NSP and risk of UL, nor vice versa. Multivariable MR adjusting for age at menarche or/and age at natural menopause revealed a significant causal effect of genetically predicted higher AFS on a lower risk of UL. Such effect attenuated to null when age at first birth was further included. Utilizing participant-level data from the UK Biobank, one-sample MR based on genetic risk scores yielded consistent null findings among both pre-menopausal and post-menopausal females. From a genetic perspective, our study demonstrates an intrinsic link underlying sexual factors (AFS and NSP) and UL, highlighting shared biological mechanisms rather than direct causal effects. Future studies are needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms involved in the shared genetic influences and their potential impact on UL development.

Genetic contribution of reproductive traits to risk of uterine leiomyomata: a large-scale, genome-wide, cross-trait analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although phenotypic associations between female reproductive characteristics and uterine leiomyomata have long been observed in epidemiologic investigations, the shared genetic architecture underlying these complex phenotypes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the shared genetic basis, pleiotropic effects, and potential causal relationships underlying reproductive traits (age at menarche, age at natural menopause, and age at first birth) and uterine leiomyomata. STUDY DESIGN: With the use of large-scale, genome-wide association studies conducted among women of European ancestry for age at menarche (n=329,345), age at natural menopause (n=201,323), age at first birth (n=418,758), and uterine leiomyomata (ncases/ncontrols=35,474/267,505), we performed a comprehensive, genome-wide, cross-trait analysis to examine systematically the common genetic influences between reproductive traits and uterine leiomyomata. RESULTS: Significant global genetic correlations were identified between uterine leiomyomata and age at menarche (rg, -0.17; P=3.65×10-10), age at natural menopause (rg, 0.23; P=3.26×10-07), and age at first birth (rg, -0.16; P=1.96×10-06). Thirteen genomic regions were further revealed as contributing significant local correlations (P<.05/2353) to age at natural menopause and uterine leiomyomata. A cross-trait meta-analysis identified 23 shared loci, 3 of which were novel. A transcriptome-wide association study found 15 shared genes that target tissues of the digestive, exo- or endocrine, nervous, and cardiovascular systems. Mendelian randomization suggested causal relationships between a genetically predicted older age at menarche (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92; P=1.50×10-10) or older age at first birth (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.99; P=.02) and a reduced risk for uterine leiomyomata and between a genetically predicted older age at natural menopause and an increased risk for uterine leiomyomata (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.09; P=2.30×10-27). No causal association in the reverse direction was found. CONCLUSION: Our work highlights that there are substantial shared genetic influences and putative causal links that underlie reproductive traits and uterine leiomyomata. The findings suggest that early identification of female reproductive risk factors may facilitate the initiation of strategies to modify potential uterine leiomyomata risk.

Epigenome-wide association studies of prenatal maternal mental health and infant epigenetic profiles: a systematic review.

Prenatal stress and poor maternal mental health are associated with adverse offspring outcomes; however, the biological mechanisms are unknown. Epigenetic modification has linked maternal health with offspring development. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have examined offspring DNA methylation profiles for association with prenatal maternal mental health to elucidate mechanisms of these complex relationships. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive, systematic review of EWASs of infant epigenetic profiles and prenatal maternal anxiety, depression, or depression treatment. We conducted a systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines for EWAS studies between prenatal maternal mental health and infant epigenetics through May 22, 2023. Of 645 identified articles, 20 fulfilled inclusion criteria. We assessed replication of CpG sites among studies, conducted gene enrichment analysis, and evaluated the articles for quality and risk of bias. We found one repeated CpG site among the maternal depression studies; however, nine pairs of overlapping differentially methylatd regions were reported in at least two maternal depression studies. Gene enrichment analysis found significant pathways for maternal depression but not for any other maternal mental health category. We found evidence that these EWAS present a medium to high risk of bias. Exposure to prenatal maternal depression and anxiety or treatment for such was not consistently associated with epigenetic changes in infants in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Small sample size, potential bias due to exposure misclassification and statistical challenges are critical to address in future efforts to explore epigenetic modification as a potential mechanism by which prenatal exposure to maternal mental health disorders leads to adverse infant outcomes.

Association Between a First-Degree Family History and Self-Reported Personal History of Obesity, Diabetes, and Heart and Blood Conditions: Results From the All of Us Research Program.

Background Family history reflects the complex interplay of genetic susceptibility and shared environmental exposures and is an important risk factor for obesity, diabetes, and heart and blood conditions (ODHB). However, the overlap in family history associations between various ODHBs has not been quantified. Methods and Results We assessed the association between a self-reported family history of ODHBs and their risk in the adult population (age ≥20 years) of the AoU (All of Us) Research Program, a longitudinal cohort study of diverse participants across the United States. We conducted a family history-wide association study to systematically assess the association of a first-degree family history of 15 ODHBs in AoU. We performed stratified analyses based on racial and ethnic categories, education, household income and gender minority status, and quantified associations by type of affected relatives. Of 125 430 participants, 76.8% reported a first-degree family history of any ODHB, most commonly hypertension (n=64 982, 51.8%), high cholesterol (49 753, 39.7%), and heart attack (29 618, 23.6%). We use the FamWAS method to estimate 225 familial associations among 15 ODHBs. The results include overlapping associations between family history of different types of cardiometabolic conditions (such as type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease), and their risk factors (obesity, hypertension), where adults with a family history of 1 ODHB exhibited 1.1 to 5.6 times (1.5, on average) the odds of having a different ODHB. Conclusions Our findings inform the utility of family history data as a risk assessment and screening tool for the prevention of ODHBs and to provide additional insights into shared risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms.

Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify drug targets for heart failure.

We conduct a large-scale meta-analysis of heart failure genome-wide association studies (GWAS) consisting of over 90,000 heart failure cases and more than 1 million control individuals of European ancestry to uncover novel genetic determinants for heart failure. Using the GWAS results and blood protein quantitative loci, we perform Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses on human proteins to provide putative causal evidence for the role of druggable proteins in the genesis of heart failure. We identify 39 genome-wide significant heart failure risk variants, of which 18 are previously unreported. Using a combination of Mendelian randomization proteomics and genetic cis-only colocalization analyses, we identify 10 additional putatively causal genes for heart failure. Findings from GWAS and Mendelian randomization-proteomics identify seven (CAMK2D, PRKD1, PRKD3, MAPK3, TNFSF12, APOC3 and NAE1) proteins as potential targets for interventions to be used in primary prevention of heart failure.

Bayesian Genetic Colocalization Test of Two Traits Using coloc.

Genetic colocalization is an approach for determining whether a genetic variant at a particular locus is shared across multiple phenotypes. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully mapped genetic variants associated with thousands of complex traits and diseases. However, a large proportion of GWAS signals fall in non-coding regions of the genome, making functional interpretation a challenge. Colocalization relies on a Bayesian framework that can integrate summary statistics, for example those derived from GWAS and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping, to assess whether two or more independent association signals at a region of interest are consistent with a shared causal variant. The results from a colocalization analysis may be used to evaluate putative causal relationships between omics-based molecular measurements and a complex disease, and can generate hypotheses that may be followed up by tailored experiments. In this article, we present an easy and straightforward protocol for conducting a Bayesian test for colocalization of two traits using the 'coloc' package in R with summary-level results derived from GWAS and eQTL studies. We also provide general guidelines that can assist in the interpretation of findings generated from colocalization analyses. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Performing a genetic colocalization analysis using the 'coloc' package in R and summary-level data Support Protocol: Installing the 'coloc' R package.

The Joint Public Health Impact of Family History of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease among Adults in the United States: A Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Family history is an established risk factor for both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes; however, no study has presented population-based prevalence estimates of family histories of CVD and diabetes and examined their joint impact on prevalence of diabetes, CVD, cardiometabolic risk factors, and mortality risk. METHODS: We analyzed data from a representative sample of the US adult population including 29,440 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2018) and assessed self-reported first-degree family history of diabetes and CVD (premature heart disease before age of 50 years) as well as meeting criteria and/or having risk factors for CVD and diabetes. RESULTS: Participants with joint family history exhibit 6.5 greater odds for having both diseases and are diagnosed with diabetes 6.6 years earlier than participants without family history. Healthy participants without prevalent CVD or diabetes but with joint family history exhibit a greater prevalence of diabetes risk factors compared to no family history counterparts. Joint family history is associated with an increase in all-cause mortality, but with no interactive effect. CONCLUSION: Over 44% of the US adult population has a family history of CVD and/or diabetes that is comparable in risk to common cardiometabolic risk factors. This wide presence of high-risk family history and its simplicity of ascertainment suggests that clinical and public health efforts should collect and act on joint family history of CVD and diabetes to improve population efforts in the prevention and early detection of these common chronic diseases.

Two-Sample Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using R.

Mendelian randomization is a framework that uses measured variation in genes for assessing and estimating the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. Multivariable Mendelian randomization is an extension that can assess the causal effect of multiple exposures on an outcome, and can be advantageous when considering a set (>1) of potentially correlated candidate risk factors in evaluating the causal effect of each on a health outcome, accounting for measured pleiotropy. This can be seen, for example, in determining the causal effects of lipids and cholesterol on type 2 diabetes risk, where the correlated risk factors share genetic predictors. Similar to univariate Mendelian randomization, multivariable Mendelian randomization can be conducted using two-sample summary-level data where the gene-exposure and gene-outcome associations are derived from separate samples from the same underlying population. Here, we present a protocol for conducting a two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization study using the 'MVMR' package in R and summary-level genetic data. We also provide a protocol for searching and obtaining instruments using available data sources in the 'MRInstruments' R package. Finally, we provide general guidelines and discuss the utility of performing a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis for simultaneously assessing causality of multiple exposures. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Performing a two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis using the 'MVMR' package in R and summarized genetic data Support Protocol 1: Installing the 'MVMR' R package Support Protocol 2: Obtaining instruments from the 'MRInstruments' R package.

Comparisons of Polyexposure, Polygenic, and Clinical Risk Scores in Risk Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a polyexposure score (PXS) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) incorporating 12 nongenetic exposures and examine whether a PXS and/or a polygenic risk score (PGS) improves diabetes prediction beyond traditional clinical risk factors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 356,621 unrelated individuals from the UK Biobank of White British ancestry with no prior diagnosis of T2D and normal HbA1c levels. Using self-reported and hospital admission information, we deployed a machine learning procedure to select the most predictive and robust factors out of 111 nongenetically ascertained exposure and lifestyle variables for the PXS in prospective T2D. We computed the clinical risk score (CRS) and PGS by taking a weighted sum of eight established clinical risk factors and >6 million single nucleotide polymorphisms, respectively. RESULTS: In the study population, 7,513 had incident T2D. The C-statistics for the PGS, PXS, and CRS models were 0.709, 0.762, and 0.839, respectively. Individuals in the top 10% of PGS, PXS, and CRS had 2.00-, 5.90-, and 9.97-fold greater risk, respectively, compared to the remaining population. Addition of PGS and PXS to CRS improved T2D classification accuracy, with a continuous net reclassification index of 15.2% and 30.1% for cases, respectively, and 7.3% and 16.9% for controls, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For T2D, the PXS provides modest incremental predictive value over established clinical risk factors. However, the concept of PXS merits further consideration in T2D risk stratification and is likely to be useful in other chronic disease risk prediction models.

Family History-Wide Association Study to Identify Clinical and Environmental Risk Factors for Common Chronic Diseases.

Family history is a strong risk factor for many common chronic diseases and summarizes shared environmental and genetic risk, but how this increased risk is mediated is unknown. We developed a "family history-wide association study" (FamWAS) to systematically and comprehensively test clinical and environmental quantitative traits (CEQTs) for their association with family history of disease. We implemented our method on 457 CEQTs for association with family history of diabetes, asthma, and coronary heart disease (CHD) in 42,940 adults spanning 8 waves of the 1999-2014 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We conducted pooled analyses of the 8 survey waves and analyzed trait associations using survey-weighted logistic regression. We identified 172 (37.6% of total), 32 (7.0%), and 78 (17.1%) CEQTs associated with family history of diabetes, asthma, and CHD, respectively, in subcohorts of individuals without the respective disease. Twenty associated CEQTs were shared across family history of diabetes, asthma, and CHD, far more than expected by chance. FamWAS can examine traits not previously studied in association with family history and uncover trait overlap, highlighting a putative shared mechanism by which family history influences disease risk.

Conducting a Reproducible Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using the R Analytic Statistical Environment.

Mendelian randomization (MR) is defined as the utilization of genetic variants as instrumental variables to assess the causal relationship between an exposure and an outcome. By leveraging genetic polymorphisms as proxy for an exposure, the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome can be assessed while addressing susceptibility to biases prone to conventional observational studies, including confounding and reverse causation, where the outcome causes the exposure. Analogous to a randomized controlled trial where patients are randomly assigned to subgroups based on different treatments, in an MR analysis, the random allocation of alleles during meiosis from parent to offspring assigns individuals to different subgroups based on genetic variants. Recent methods use summary statistics from genome-wide association studies to perform MR, bypassing the need for individual-level data. Here, we provide a straightforward protocol for using summary-level data to perform MR and provide guidance for utilizing available software. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Leveraging Population-Based Clinical Quantitative Phenotyping for Drug Repositioning.

Computational drug repositioning methods can scalably nominate approved drugs for new diseases, with reduced risk of unforeseen side effects. The majority of methods eschew individual-level phenotypes despite the promise of biomarker-driven repositioning. In this study, we propose a framework for discovering serendipitous interactions between drugs and routine clinical phenotypes in cross-sectional observational studies. Key to our strategy is the use of a healthy and nondiabetic population derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, mitigating risk for confounding by indication. We combine complementary diagnostic phenotypes (fasting glucose and glucose response) and associate them with prescription drug usage. We then sought confirmation of phenotype-drug associations in unidentifiable member claims data from the Aetna Insurance company using a retrospective self-controlled case analysis approach. We identify bupropion as a plausible glucose lowering agent, suggesting that surveying otherwise healthy individuals in cross-sectional studies can discover new drug repositioning hypotheses that have applicability to longitudinal clinical practice.