Effect of structured use of preoperative portal vein embolization on outcomes after liver resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to reduce the risk of liver failure and subsequent mortality after major liver resection. Although a cut-off value of 2·7 per cent per min per m2 has been used with hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) for future remnant liver function (FRLF), patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) potentially benefit from an additional cut-off of 8·5 per cent/min (not corrected for body surface area). Since January 2016 a more liberal approach to PVE has been adopted, including this additional cut-off for HBS of 8·5 per cent/min. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of this approach on liver failure and mortality. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study in which consecutive patients undergoing liver resection under suspicion of PHC in 2000-2015 were compared with patients treated in 2016-2019, after implementation of the more liberal approach. Primary outcomes were postoperative liver failure (International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C) and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Some 191 patients with PHC underwent liver resection. PVE was performed in 6·4 per cent (9 of 141) of the patients treated in 2000-2015 and in 32 per cent (16 of 50) of those treated in 2016-2019. The 90-day mortality rate decreased from 16·3 per cent (23 of 141) to 2 per cent (1 of 50) (P = 0·009), together with a decrease in the rate of liver failure from 19·9 per cent (28 of 141) to 4 per cent (2 of 50) (P = 0·008). In 2016-2019, 24 patients had a FRLF greater than 8·5 per cent/min and no liver failure or death occurred, suggesting that 8·5 per cent/min is a reliable cut-off for patients with suspected PHC. CONCLUSION: The major decrease in liver failure and mortality rates in recent years and the simultaneous increased use of PVE suggests an important role for PVE in reducing adverse outcomes after surgery for PHC.

ANTECEDENTES: La embolización de la vena porta (portal vein embolization, PVE) se realiza para reducir el riesgo de insuficiencia hepática y de mortalidad asociada después de una resección hepática mayor. Aunque con la gammagrafía hepato-biliar (hepato-biliary scintigraphy, HBS) se ha utilizado un punto de corte de 2,7%/min/m2 para la función hepática remanente futura (future remnant liver function, FRLF), los pacientes con colangiocarcinoma perihilar (perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, PHC) se beneficiarían potencialmente de un punto de corte adicional de 8,5%/min (no corregido para el área de superficie corporal). Desde enero de 2016, se adoptó un enfoque más liberal para la PVE, incluyendo este punto de corte adicional para la HBS de 8,5%/min. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de este enfoque sobre la insuficiencia hepática y la mortalidad. MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro, en el que los pacientes consecutivos sometidos a resección hepática por sospecha de PHC entre 2000-2016 se compararon con los pacientes tratados entre 2016-2019, después de la implementación de un enfoque más liberal. Los objetivos primarios fueron la insuficiencia hepática postoperatoria (ISGLS grado B/C) y la mortalidad a los 90 días. RESULTADOS: Un total de 191 pacientes con PHC se sometieron a resección hepática. Se realizó PVE en el 6% (9/141) de los pacientes antes de 2016 y en el 32% (16/50) de los pacientes después de 2016. La mortalidad disminuyó del 16% (23/141) al 2% (1/50) (P = 0,009), junto con una disminución de la insuficiencia hepática del 20% (28/141) al 4% (2/50) (P = 0,008). Después de 2016, 20 pacientes tuvieron un FRLF > 8,5%/min y no se produjo insuficiencia hepática o mortalidad, lo que sugiere que el 8,5%/min es un punto de corte fiable para los pacientes con sospecha de PHC. CONCLUSIÓN: La disminución marcada de la insuficiencia hepática y de la mortalidad en los últimos años y el aumento simultáneo del uso de la PVE, sugiere que la PVE ha jugado un importante papel en el descenso de los resultados adversos después de la cirugía para el PHC.

Comparison between dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT for quantitative assessment of liver function.

OBJECTIVES: To compare Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) with 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) as quantitative liver function tests for the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing liver surgery and preoperative assessment of future remnant liver (FRL) function using 99mTc-mebrofenin HBS were included. Patients underwent DHCE-MRI. Total liver uptake function was calculated for both modalities: mebrofenin uptake rate (MUR) and Ki respectively. The FRL was delineated with both SPECT-CT and MRI to calculate the functional share. Blood samples were taken to assess biochemical liver parameters. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included. The HBS-derived MUR and the DHCE-MRI-derived mean Ki correlated strongly for both total and FRL function (Pearson r = 0.70, p = 0.001 and r = 0.89, p < 0.001 respectively). There was a strong agreement between the functional share determined with both modalities (ICC = 0.944, 95% CI 0.863-0.978, n = 20). There was a significant negative correlation between liver aminotransferases and bilirubin for both MUR and Ki. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of liver function with DHCE-MRI is comparable with that of 99mTc-mebrofenin HBS and has the potential to be combined with diagnostic MRI imaging. This can therefore provide a one-stop-shop modality for the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing liver surgery. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative assessment of liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy is performed in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing liver surgery in order to prevent posthepatectomy liver failure. • Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) is an emerging method to quantify liver function and can serve as a potential alternative to hepatobiliary scintigraphy. • Assessment of liver function with dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI is comparable with that of hepatobiliary scintigraphy and has the potential to be combined with diagnostic MRI imaging.

Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience.

AIM: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging disease and requires aggressive surgical treatment in order to achieve curation. The assessment and work-up of patients with presumed PHC is multidisciplinary, complex and requires extensive experience. The aim of this paper is to review current aspects of diagnosis, preoperative work-up and extended resection in patients with PHC from the perspective of our own institutional experience with this complex tumor. METHODS: We provided a review of applied modalities in the diagnosis and work-up of PHC according to current literature. All patients with presumed PHC in our center between 2000 and 2016 were identified and described. The types of resection, surgical techniques and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Upcoming diagnostic modalities such as Spyglass and combinations of serum biomarkers and molecular markers have potential to decrease the rate of misdiagnosis of benign, inflammatory disease. Assessment of liver function with hepatobiliary scintigraphy provides better information on the future remnant liver (FRL) than volume alone. The selective use of staging laparoscopy is advisable to avoid futile laparotomies. In patients requiring extended resection, selective preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory in cholangitis and when FRL is small (< 50%). Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is used when FRL volume is less than 40% and optionally includes the left portal vein branches to segment 4. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as alternative to PVE is not recommended in PHC. N2 positive lymph nodes preclude long-term survival. The benefit of unconditional en bloc resection of the portal vein bifurcation is uncertain. Along these lines, an aggressive surgical approach encompassing extended liver resection including segment 1, regional lymphadenectomy and conditional portal venous resection translates into favorable long-term survival.