Cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction to low molecular weight heparins in pregnancy, cross reactivity and prednisolone treatment: A case report.

In pregnant women, low molecular weight heparin is recommended as the preferred agent for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment. Despite their widespread application, heparin-induced skin lesions are probably under-reported and under-estimated. We present a case report of a primigravida treated with low molecular weight heparin for deep vein thrombosis, who developed a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to enoxaparin, tinzaparin and dalteparin. As the patient was pregnant, treatment options were restricted. Tolerance was achieved with dalteparin with adjuvant administration of prednisolone. An attempt to decrease prednisolone dose triggered delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction recurrence that was solved by keeping the initial prednisolone prescription. To the best of our knowledge, there are no described cases using this approach. In cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to low molecular weight heparin during pregnancy our case suggests that switching low molecular weight heparin and adjuvant administration of prednisolone can be an option.

Cystic fibrosis and jejunoileal atresia: A clinical case.

We present a case report of a fetal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after ultrasound abnormalities. After delivery, a type 3A intestinal atresia was diagnosed. Segmental enterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis was performed. This case report highlights the diagnosis complexity of a fetal intestinal atresia associated with cystic fibrosis.

Intermittent versus Continuous Catheterization and Differences in the Evolution of Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences between bladder emptying options (permanent catheterization and intermittent bladder emptying/spontaneous urination) regarding the effects on labor length, need of operative vaginal deliveries, and cesarean section rate. DATA SOURCES: The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. SELECTION OF STUDIES: The survey returned 964 studies. A total of 719 studies were evaluated by title and abstract, of which 4 were selected for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION: All references were inserted in the Rayyan QCRI tool (Rayyan Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). The full text of the selected articles was obtained so we could later decide whether or not to include them in this systematic review. DATA SYNTHESIS: No differences were found in the number of instrumented deliveries or in cesarean section rate between groups. CONCLUSIONS: After evaluating the studies performed on the topic, we concluded that there is no clear advantage to either method, although continuous catheterization was associated with a greater occurrence of eutocic births. In the remaining outcomes, there were no differences between catheterization types.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar as diferenças entre as opções de esvaziamento vesical (cateterismo permanente e esvaziamento vesical intermitente/micção espontânea) em relação aos efeitos na duração do trabalho de parto, necessidade de partos vaginais operatórios e taxa de cesárea. FONTES DE DADOS: A pesquisa foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, e The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. SELEçãO DE ESTUDOS: A pesquisa retornou 964 estudos. Um total de 719 estudos foram avaliados por título e resumo, dos quais 4 foram selecionados para inclusão. COLETA DE DADOS: Todas as referências foram inseridas na ferramenta Rayyan QCRI (Rayyan Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA, EUA). O texto completo dos artigos selecionados foi obtido para posterior decisão de incluí-los nesta revisão sistemática. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: Não foram encontradas diferenças no número de partos instrumentados ou na taxa de cesariana entre os grupos. CONCLUSõES: Após avaliação dos estudos realizados sobre o tema, concluímos que não há vantagem clara de qualquer um dos métodos, embora o cateterismo contínuo tenha sido associado à maior ocorrência de partos eutócicos. Nos demais desfechos, não houve diferenças entre os tipos de cateterismo.

Intermittent versus Continuous Catheterization and Differences in the Evolution of Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis / Cateterismo intermitente versus contínuo e diferenças na evolução do trabalho de parto: Revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Abstract Objective To evaluate the differences between bladder emptying options (permanent catheterization and intermittent bladder emptying/spontaneous urination) regarding the effects on labor length, need of operative vaginal deliveries, and cesarean section rate. Data Sources The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Selection of Studies The survey returned 964 studies. A total of 719 studies were evaluated by title and abstract, of which 4 were selected for inclusion. Data Collection All references were inserted in the Rayyan QCRI tool (Rayyan Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). The full text of the selected articles was obtained so we could later decide whether or not to include them in this systematic review. Data Synthesis No differences were found in the number of instrumented deliveries or in cesarean section rate between groups. Conclusions After evaluating the studies performed on the topic, we concluded that there is no clear advantage to either method, although continuous catheterization was associated with a greater occurrence of eutocic births. In the remaining outcomes, there were no differences between catheterization types.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar as diferenças entre as opções de esvaziamento vesical (cateterismo permanente e esvaziamento vesical intermitente/micção espontânea) em relação aos efeitos na duração do trabalho de parto, necessidade de partos vaginais operatórios e taxa de cesárea. Fontes de Dados A pesquisa foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, e The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Seleção de Estudos A pesquisa retornou 964 estudos. Um total de 719 estudos foram avaliados por título e resumo, dos quais 4 foram selecionados para inclusão. Coleta de Dados Todas as referências foram inseridas na ferramenta Rayyan QCRI (Rayyan Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA, EUA). O texto completo dos artigos selecionados foi obtido para posterior decisão de incluí-los nesta revisão sistemática. Síntese dos Dados Não foram encontradas diferenças no número de partos instrumentados ou na taxa de cesariana entre os grupos. Conclusões Após avaliação dos estudos realizados sobre o tema, concluímos que não hávantagem clara de qualquer um dos métodos, embora o cateterismo contínuo tenha sido associado à maior ocorrência de partos eutócicos. Nos demais desfechos, não houve diferenças entre os tipos de cateterismo.

Influence of Time Interval from Bariatric Surgery to Conception on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy in women submitted to bariatric surgery is increasing. Recommendations for surveillance of these pregnancies have been suggested, but an adequate time interval from surgery to conception, to avoid perinatal negative outcomes, is still controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of pregnancies in women with previous bariatric surgery were retrieved and outcomes were assessed according to three different time thresholds (12, 18 and 24 months). The association between time from surgery to conception and the presence of adverse outcomes was analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-six pregnancies were assessed. Weight gain was higher (p = 0.014) and more adequate (p = 0.041) when pregnancy occurred more than 12 months after surgery. Foetal growth percentile was lower when pregnancy was achieved before 24 months following surgery (p = 0.021). No differences among groups were found in other assessed outcomes (BMI, gestational age at delivery, type of delivery, gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertensive disease, anaemia, preterm delivery, foetal weight, foetal growth restriction, Apgar score, admission to neonatal intensive unit) in all considered thresholds. No association between time from surgery to conception and the presence of adverse outcomes was found. CONCLUSION: Despite differences found in maternal weight gain and foetal growth percentile, our study does not support the recommendation to delay pregnancy based on a fixed deadline. Other factors, including a more individualised approach, need to be considered.

Improved malignancy prediction by B3 breast lesions subclassification.

Core-needle biopsy (CNB) of breast lesions can be classified into 5 categories according to lesion type and associated risk of malignancy. B3 category (lesion of uncertain malignant potential) constitutes a challenging problem in clinical decision, with most ending in excisional biopsy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish the incidence of malignancy on excision biopsy of B3 lesions and assess if subclassification (in B3a and B3b categories) according to the presence of atypia in otherwise B3 lesions better predicts malignancy on excision. Forty-eight cases with diagnosis of B3 lesion on CNB and matched surgical excision specimen were included to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and odds for malignancy in CNB. All cases were further subclassified into B3a and B3b categories. B3 category lesions had an overall PPV for malignancy of 12.5% and significant low odds of malignancy of 0.14. When subclassified, B3b (lesions with atypia) demonstrated a higher PPV for malignancy (36.36%) with a nonsignificant odds. Inversely, B3a (lesions without atypia) demonstrated a PPV for malignancy of only 5.41% and a significant low odds of malignancy of only 0.06. The described low rate of malignancy in some of B3 lesions additionally reinforces the practice of avoiding surgical excision in selected patients and provides data that additionally support B3 lesion subclassification according to the presence of atypia. Subclassification of B3 category can further refine the current classification of associated risk of malignancy with possible implications in clinical management.