Clinical Variables Associated With Grade III and IV Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) in Preterm Infants Weighing Less Than 750 Grams.

BACKGROUND: Despite innovative advances in neonatal medicine, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) continues to be a significant complication in neonatal intensive care units globally. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to discern the variables heightening the risk of severe IVH (Grade III and IV) in extremely premature infants weighing less than 750 grams. We postulated that a descending hematocrit (Hct) trend during the first week of life could serve as a predictive marker for the development of severe IVH in this vulnerable population. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study encompassed infants weighing less than 750 grams at birth, diagnosed with Grade III and/or IV IVH, and born in a tertiary center from 2009 to 2014. A group of 17 infants with severe IVH was compared with 14 gestational age-matched controls. Acid-base status, glucose, fluid goal, urine output, and nutrient (caloric and protein) intake during the first four days of life were meticulously evaluated. Statistically significant variables from baseline data were further analyzed via univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, ensuring control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: The univariate logistic regression model delineated odds ratios (ORs) of 0.842 for day 2 average Hct (confidence interval [CI], 0.718-0.987) and 0.16 for urine output on day 3 (CI, 0.024-1.056), with the remaining six variables demonstrating no significant association. In the post-multivariable regression analysis, day 2 Hct was the only significant variable (OR, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.537-0.995; P=0.04). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis portrayed an area under the curve of 71% for the day 2 Hct variable. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that a dip in Hct on day 2 of life augments the likelihood of Grade III and IV IVH among extremely premature infants with a birth weight of less than 750 grams. This insight amplifies our understanding of risk factors associated with severe IVH development in extremely preterm infants, potentially aiding in refining preventive strategies and optimizing clinical management and treatment of these affected infants.

Base excess and hematocrit predict response to indomethacin in very low birth weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants remains a challenge. The ability to predict which infants will respond to indomethacin could spare some from the risks of unnecessary medications. Our objective was to determine if indicators of acid-base homeostasis could predict response to indomethacin treatment for ductal closure, and thus help guide treatment decisions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of VLBW (< 1500 g) neonates with hemodynamically significant PDA born at our institution between January 2009 and December 2012; all infants included in the study were treated with indomethacin for ductal closure within the first 2 weeks of life. We extracted data for a number of clinical variables including gestational age, birth weight, blood chemistries, surfactant use, hematocrit, and blood gas parameters. Our primary outcome measure was successful closure of PDA following the first round of indomethacin. Using variables that were significant on initial testing, we created multivariable regression models to determine the independent association of selected variables with indomethacin response. RESULTS: Of the 91 infants included in the study, 62 (68%) responded to the first course of indomethacin with successful ductal closure. Multivariable regression modeling revealed that both base excess and hematocrit were independently associated with indomethacin response; odds of PDA closure increased with increasing base excess (OR [odds ratio]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-2.60) and increasing hematocrit (OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01-1.45). The optimal cutoff value for base excess was - 4.56, with a sensitivity of 96.8% (95% CI: 89-100) and specificity of 79.3% (95% CI: 60-92); optimal cutoff value for hematocrit was 40, with 69.4% sensitivity (95% CI: 56-80) and 65.5% specificity (95% CI: 46-82). CONCLUSIONS: Base excess and hematocrit may be independent predictors of indomethacin response in VLBW infants with PDA. Low-cost and readily accessible, acid-base indicators such as base excess could help guide treatment decisions.

Meconium aspiration syndrome in infants of HIV-positive women: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether maternal HIV infection in the current era is associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in their infants. METHODS: Infants born to 149 HIV-positive women at our hospital over a 5-year period were compared with infants born to HIV-negative women in a retrospective case-control study. Charts of all 298 patients included in the study were reviewed for maternal and infant demographics, HIV treatment, vertical transmission and untoward events at delivery or during the hospital course. RESULTS: When compared with HIV-negative women, a greater proportion of HIV-positive women had meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), 33% vs. 13%, P<0.001; and thick MSAF, 17% vs. 5%, P<0.001, respectively. Seven of 298 infants were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for MAS; all seven were born to HIV-positive women (P=0.015). Although in utero exposure to illicit drugs is a reported risk factor for meconium staining of the amniotic fluid and such drug exposure was more common among our HIV-positive sample, controlling for this and other possible covariates did not greatly reduce the association of HIV status with meconium-related complications of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Infants born to HIV-positive women had significantly more MSAF and MAS than infants born to non-infected women. It is unclear whether this association results from maternal HIV infection itself or from anti-retroviral therapy. Maternal and infant care providers should be prepared for this complication when attending to the deliveries of HIV-positive women.

Vertically aligned ZnO nanorod core-polypyrrole conducting polymer sheath and nanotube arrays for electrochemical supercapacitor energy storage.

Nanocomposite electrodes having three-dimensional (3-D) nanoscale architecture comprising of vertically aligned ZnO nanorod array core-polypyrrole (PPy) conducting polymer sheath and the vertical PPy nanotube arrays have been investigated for supercapacitor energy storage. The electrodes in the ZnO nanorod core-PPy sheath structure are formed by preferential nucleation and deposition of PPy layer over hydrothermally synthesized vertical ZnO nanorod array by controlled pulsed current electropolymerization of pyrrole monomer under surfactant action. The vertical PPy nanotube arrays of different tube diameter are created by selective etching of the ZnO nanorod core in ammonia solution for different periods. Cyclic voltammetry studies show high areal-specific capacitance approximately 240 mF.cm(-2) for open pore and approximately 180 mF.cm(-2) for narrow 30-to-36-nm diameter PPy nanotube arrays attributed to intensive faradic processes arising from enhanced access of electrolyte ions through nanotube interior and exterior. Impedance spectroscopy studies show that capacitive response extends over larger frequency domain in electrodes with PPy nanotube structure. Simulation of Nyquist plots by electrical equivalent circuit modeling establishes that 3-D nanostructure is better represented by constant phase element which accounts for the inhomogeneous electrochemical redox processes. Charge-discharge studies at different current densities establish that kinetics of the redox process in PPy nanotube electrode is due to the limitation on electron transport rather than the diffusive process of electrolyte ions. The PPy nanotube electrodes show deep discharge capability with high coulomb efficiency and long-term charge-discharge cyclic studies show nondegrading performance of the specific areal capacitance tested for 5,000 cycles.

Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily gentamicin dosing regimens in infants > or = 2500 g.

OBJECTIVE: There is no uniformity in the current recommendations of dosing regimen of gentamicin for neonates. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare a once-daily dosing regimen to the twice-daily dosing regimen for neonates > or = 2500 g during the first 7 days after birth. STUDY DESIGN: Infants > or = 2500 g admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and prescribed gentamicin for suspected bacterial infection were randomized to receive either 4 mg/kg every 24 hours, study group (n=20), or a standard regimen of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours, control group (n=21). Serum gentamicin concentrations (SGCs) were followed and gentamicin pharmacokinetics calculated on all infants. RESULTS: Peak SGC 30 minutes after the first dose was 8.2+/-1.7 microg/ml in the study group, compared to 6.4+/-1.5 microg/ml in the control group (p=0.001). Ninety-five percent of study group infants, compared to 81% of the control group, had peak SGCs in therapeutic range after the first dose. Peak SGC at 48 hours (steady state) was 8.9+/-1.5 in the study group and 6.8+/-1.1 in the control group (p=0.0001). On further analysis, a significantly higher percentage of infants in the study group, compared to the control group, had peak SGCs in higher therapeutic ranges of 6 to 12 microg/ml as well as 8 to 12 microg/ml. None of the study infants, compared to six control infants, had trough SGCs > or = 2 microg/ml at steady state. Thus, none of the study group infants, versus six of the control group infants, needed a dosing adjustment at 48 hours (p=0.02, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: We found that 4 mg/kg gentamicin given every 24 hours achieved significantly higher peak SGCs and safe trough concentrations in all infants, compared to the twice-daily regimen of 2.5 mg/kg. We suggest that SGCs may not need to be followed in term infants prescribed a short course of this once-daily regimen for suspected early-onset sepsis if renal functions are normal.

Comparison of two gentamicin dosing schedules in very low birth weight infants.

BACKGROUND: Several dosing schedules for gentamicin have been recommended for very low birth weight infants during the early neonatal period. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare efficacy and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules in preterm neonates. METHODS: Fifty-eight very low birth weight infants (600 to 1500 g), prescribed gentamicin for treatment of suspected sepsis during the first week after birth, were randomized to receive either the new dosing schedule [every 48 h (q48h)] or the existing dosing schedule [every 24 h (q24h)]. Infants in the "q48h" group received gentamicin at 5.0 or 4.5 mg/kg/dose q48h depending on weight group and infants in the "q24h" group received 2.5 or 3.0 mg/kg/dose q24h. Peak and trough serum gentamicin concentrations were monitored. RESULTS: Peak serum gentamicin concentrations after the first dose were significantly higher in the q48h infants than in q24h infants (8.19 +/- 1.3 vs. 6.04 +/- 2.2, P = 0.00001). Ninety percent of all peak serum gentamicin concentrations in the q48h group were in a higher therapeutic range of 6 to 12 microg/ml as compared with 55% of q24h (P = 0.0005). None of the q48h infants had subtherapeutic serum gentamicin concentrations immediately after administration of the first dose as compared with 36% of q24h infants (P < 0.005). Eighteen percent of q24h infants continued to have peak serum gentamicin concentrations in subtherapeutic range even after the third dose at 48 h. Trough serum gentamicin concentrations were significantly lower in q48h infants than in q24h infants. However, 9 of 30 (30%) q48h infants had trough serum gentamicin concentrations of < or = 0.5 microg/ml before the dose at 48 h and 4 of the 9 had serum gentamicin concentrations of <1 microg/ml at 24 h after the first dose. CONCLUSIONS: The q48h dosing schedule of gentamicin given to very low birth weight infants during the first week after birth achieved therapeutic serum gentamicin concentrations and potentially higher peak to MIC ratios for microorganisms in all infants. However, nearly one-third of the infants had extremely low serum gentamicin concentrations before the next dose. A dosing interval of 36 h might be optimal for bactericidal activity and avoid bacterial growth during prolonged periods of extremely low serum gentamicin concentrations; this dosing interval warrants study.