Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 175
Filter
1.
J Neurooncol ; 164(1): 141-146, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37452916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) patients have poor survival outcomes despite treatment advances and most recurrences occur within the radiation field. Survival outcomes after dose escalation through hypofractionated accelerated RT(HART) were evaluated in this study. We previously reported the study's initial results showing similar survival outcomes with acceptable toxicities. Updated results after 5 years are being analysed to determine long-term survival trends. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 89 patients of newly diagnosed GBM after surgery were randomized to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) or HART. CRT arm received adjuvant RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks and the HART arm received 60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, both with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. RESULTS: 83 patients were eligible for analysis. After a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the median OS was 26.5 months and 22.4 months in the HART and CRT arms respectively. 5 year OS was 18.4% in the HART arm versus 3.8% in the CRT arm. This numerical difference in overall survival between the two arms was not statistically significant. The median PFS was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of the trial support HART as a promising treatment option with comparable survival outcomes to the current standard of care. Phase III trials are required for further validation of this regimen which has the potential to become the new standard of care in GBM.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Temozolomide/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use
2.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 714, 2023 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37525142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Precise prognostication is the key to optimum and effective treatment planning for early-stage hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients. Differences in the breast cancer incidence and tumor anatomical features at diagnosis, pharmacogenomics data between Western and Indian women along with the vast diversity in the economic status and differences in insurance policies of these regions; suggest recommendations put forward for Western women might not be applicable to Indian/Asian women. Opinions from oncologists through a voting survey on various prognostic factors/tools to be considered for planning adjuvant therapy are consolidated in this report for the benefit of oncologists of the sub-continent, SAARC and Asia's LMIC (low and middle-income countries). METHODS: A three-phase DELPHI survey was conducted to collect opinions on prognostic factors considered for planning adjuvant therapy in early-stage HR+/HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients. A panel of 25 oncologists with expertise in breast cancer participated in the survey conducted in 2021. The experts provided opinions as 'agree' or disagree' or 'not sure' in phases-1 and 2 which were conducted virtually; in the final phase-3, all the panel experts met in person and concluded the survey. RESULTS: Opinions on 41 statements related to prognostic factors/tools and their implications in planning adjuvant endocrine/chemotherapy were collected. All the statements were supported by the latest data from the clinical trials (prospective/retrospective). The statements with opinions of consensus less than 66% were disseminated in phase-2, and later in phase-3 with supporting literature. In phase-3, all the opinions from panelists were consolidated and guidelines were framed. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus guideline will assist oncologists of India, SAARC and LMIC countries in informed clinical decision-making on adjuvant treatment in early HR+/HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Prospective Studies , Developing Countries , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/therapeutic use
4.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 19(Supplement): S20-S35, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147979

ABSTRACT

A biomarker is a measurable indicator used to distinguish precisely/objectively either normal biological state/pathological condition/response to a specific therapeutic intervention. The use of novel molecular biomarkers within evidence-based medicine may improve the diagnosis/treatment of disease, improve health outcomes, and reduce the disease's socio-economic impact. Presently cancer biomarkers are the backbone of therapy, with greater efficacy and better survival rates. Cancer biomarkers are extensively used to treat cancer and monitor the disease's progress, drug response, relapses, and drug resistance. The highest percent of all biomarkers explored are in the domain of cancer. Extensive research using various methods/tissues is carried out for identifying biomarkers for early detection, which has been mostly unsuccessful. The quantitative/qualitative detection of various biomarkers in different tissues should ideally be done in accordance with qualification rules laid down by the Early Detection Research Network (EDRN), Program for the Assessment of Clinical Cancer Tests (PACCT), and National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Many biomarkers are presently under investigation, but lacunae lie in the biomarker's sensitivity and specificity. An ideal biomarker should be quantifiable, reliable, of considerable high/low expression, correlate with the outcome progression, cost-effective, and consistent across gender and ethnic groups. Further, we also highlight that these biomarkers' application remains questionable in childhood malignancies due to the lack of reference values in the pediatric population. The development of a cancer biomarker stands very challenging due to its complexity and sensitivity/resistance to the therapy. In past decades, the cross-talks between molecular pathways have been targeted to study the nature of cancer. To generate sensitive and specific biomarkers representing the pathogenesis of specific cancer, predicting the treatment responses and outcomes would necessitate inclusion of multiple biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Neoplasms , Child , Humans , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers/metabolism , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
5.
Neurol India ; 70(5): 2086-2092, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352613

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Different variant of GBM has been reported viz. Epithelioid Glioblastoma (GBM-E), Rhabdoid GBM (GBM-R), Small cell GBM (GBM-SC), Giant cell GBM (GBM-GC), GBM with neuro ectodermal differentiation (GBM-PNET) with unknown behavior. Materials: We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data analysis of these rare GBM variants. We searched PubMed, google search, and Cochrane library for eligible studies till July 1st 2016 published in English language and collected data regarding age, sex, subtype and treatment received, Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS). Statistical Package for social sciences (SPSS) v16 software was used for all statistical analysis. Results: We retrieved data of 196 patients with rare GBM subtypes. Among these GBM-GC is commonest (51%), followed by GBM-R (19%), GBM-PNET (13%), GBM-SC (9%) and GBM-E (8%). Median age at diagnosis was 38, 40, 43.5, 69.5 and 18 years, respectively. Male: female ratio was 2:1 for GBM-E, and 1:3 for GBM-SC. Maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant local radiation was used for most of the patients. However, 6 patients with GBM-PNET, 3 each of GBM-E, GBM-SC received adjuvant craniospinal radiation. Out of 88 patients who received chemotherapy, 64 received Temozolomide alone or combination chemotherapy containing Temozolomide. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 9 and 16 months. In univariate analysis, patient with a Gross Total Resection had significantly better PFS and OS compared to those with a Sub Total Resection [23 vs. 13 months (p-0.01)]. Median OS for GBM PNET, GBM-GC, GBM-SC, GBM-R and GBM-E were 32, 18.3, 11, 12 and 7.7 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Interestingly, 31.3%, 37.8% of patients with GBM-E, GBM-R had CSF dissemination. Conclusion: Overall cohort of rarer GBM variant has equivalent survival compared to GBM not otherwise specified. However, epithelioid and Rhabdoid GBM has worst survival and one third shows CSF dissemination.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive , Humans , Male , Female , Temozolomide/therapeutic use , Data Analysis , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use
6.
Indian J Cancer ; 59(3): 442-453, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36412324

ABSTRACT

Oral cancer is usually preceded by oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and early detection can downstage the disease. The majority of OPMDs are asymptomatic in early stages and can be detected on routine oral examination. Though only a proportion of OPMDs may transform to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), they may serve as a surrogate clinical lesion to identify individuals at risk of developing OSCC. Currently, there is a scarcity of scientific evidence on specific interventions and management of OPMDs and there is no consensus regarding their management. A consensus meeting with a panel of experts was convened to frame guidelines for clinical practices and recommendations for management strategies for OPMDs. A review of literature from medical databases was conducted to provide the best possible evidence and provide recommendations in management of OPMDs.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Diseases , Mouth Neoplasms , Precancerous Conditions , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Mouth Diseases/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
7.
Future Sci OA ; 8(4): FSO791, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35369277

ABSTRACT

Aim: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. The optimal treatment protocols are debated. Methodology: A systematic search and individual patient data analysis of published cases of SDC was performed. SPSS v21 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Data of 857 patients available. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort 42 months and 24 months. Nodal involvement, males, primary size >5 cm, androgen receptor (AR) negativity significantly worse OS. Patients with surgery had a favorable median PFS (p = 0.000) and OS (p = 0.077). Patients with adjuvant radiation had better PFS (30 vs 18 months; p = 0.077). Conclusion: SDC has modest survival. Surgery and adjuvant radiation should be advocated for all patients. AR expression appears prognostic for survival.

8.
Neurol India ; 70(1): 372-374, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35263918

ABSTRACT

Rosette forming glioneural tumors (RGNT) are a rare type of low-grade brain tumor included in 2007 in WHO classification. Given the benign nature of the disease, a complete surgical excision has been considered optimum. However, a handful of cases have reported the locally aggressive nature of RGNT. In addition, radiation may also be considered for a tumor located in areas where surgical excision is difficult. We present a similar case, where surgical risk was weighed against resection and we treated the patient with conformal radiation.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms/pathology , Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Fourth Ventricle/pathology , Humans , Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial/pathology , Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial/radiotherapy
9.
Indian J Surg Oncol ; 13(Suppl 1): 58-60, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691512

ABSTRACT

Radiation therapy is one of the core components of the comprehensive cancer care. Several new advancements in the radiation physics, radiation biology, and technical upgradation have led us in to a new era of radiation oncology. The access to quality radiation therapy treatment however remains a concern, and this mini-review emphasizes on these issues and also focuses on the future directions for radiation oncology in India.

10.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 17(4): 834-844, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34528529

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy is a treatment that uses specific components of a person's immune system to fight diseases. This is usually done by stimulating or assisting one's immune system is attacking the offending agent - for instance, in the case of cancer - the target of immunotherapy will be cancer cells. Some types of immunotherapy are also called biologic therapy or biotherapy. One of the fundamental challenges that a living cell encounters are to accurately copy its genetic material to daughter cells during every single cell cycle. When this process goes haywire, genomic instability ensues, and genetic alterations ranging from nucleotide changes to chromosomal translocations and aneuploidy occur. Genomic instability arising out of DNA structural changes (indels, rearrangements, etc.,) can give rise to mutations predisposing to cancer. Cancer prevention refers to actions taken to mitigate the risk of getting cancer. The past decade has encountered an explosive rate of development of anticancer therapy ranging from standard chemotherapy to novel targeted small molecules that are nearly cancer specific, thereby reducing collateral damage. However, a new class of emerging therapy aims to train the body's defense system to fight against cancer. Termed as "cancer immunotherapy" is the new approach that has gained worldwide acceptance. It includes using antibodies that bind to and inhibit the function of proteins expressed by cancer cells or engineering and boosting the person's own T lymphocytes to target cancer. In this review, we summarized the recent advances and developments in cancer immunotherapy along with their shortcoming and challenges.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/drug therapy , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Animals , Humans , Neoplasms/immunology
11.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1126): 20210187, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34545760

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as pandemic in March 2020. Currently there is no specific effective treatment for COVID-19. The major cause of death in COVID-19 is severe pneumonia leading to respiratory failure. Radiation in low doses (<100 cGy) has been known for its anti-inflammatory effect and therefore, low dose radiation therapy (LDRT) to lungs can potentially mitigate the severity of pneumonia and reduce mortality. We conducted a pilot trial to study the feasibility and clinical efficacy of LDRT to lungs in the management of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: From June to Aug 2020, we enrolled 10 patients with COVID-19 having moderate to severe risk disease [National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of ≥5]. Patients were treated as per the standard COVID-19 management guidelines along with LDRT to both lungs with a dose of 70cGy in single fraction. Response assessment was done based on the clinical parameters using the NEWS. RESULTS: All patients completed the prescribed treatment. Nine patients had complete clinical recovery mostly within a period ranging from 3 to 7 days. One patient, who was a known hypertensive, showed clinical deterioration and died 24 days after LDRT. No patients showed the signs of acute radiation toxicity. CONCLUSION: The results of our pilot study suggest that LDRT is feasible in COVID-19 patients having moderate to severe disease. Its clinical efficacy may be tested by conducting randomized controlled trials. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: LDRT has shown promising results in COVID-19 pneumonia and should be researched further through randomized controlled trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/radiotherapy , Pneumonia, Viral/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Early Warning Score , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pilot Projects , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Radiotherapy Dosage , SARS-CoV-2
12.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 17(2): 295-302, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34121671

ABSTRACT

The world is fighting the onslaught of COVID 19 for the last 10 months, ever since the first case was reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Now, it has spread to over 200 countries. COVID 19-associated respiratory syndrome is causing a lot of mortality and morbidity. There are reports suggesting that the complications and ARDS associated with COVID 19 is an immune response reaction. The cytokine storm associated with severe cases of COVID 19 acts as a cause of death in many sick patients. It has been shown that COVID 19 is associated with a peculiar immune profile: Decrease in CD3, CD4, CD8, natural killer cell and B-cells; Rise in interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha; Decrease in IL-10; Decrease in interferon-gamma. Low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) immunosuppressive features resulting from M2 macrophage phenotype activation, increase in IL-10, transforming growth factor beta, a decrease in IL-6, TNF alpha and an increase in CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cell counts may negate the harmful effects of cytokine release syndrome. Literature review shows that radiation was previously used to treat viral pneumonia with a good success rate. This practice was discontinued in view of the availability of effective antibiotics and antivirals. As there are no scientifically proven treatment for severe COVID 19-associated respiratory distress today, it is prudent that we understand the benefits of LDRT at this critical juncture and take rational decisions to treat the same. This article provides an radioimmunological rationale for the treatment of immune crisis mediated complications in severe cases of COVID 19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/radiotherapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/radiotherapy , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Clinical Decision-Making , Cytokine Release Syndrome/immunology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/virology , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
13.
Am J Blood Res ; 11(1): 22-43, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33796387

ABSTRACT

The progress in the field of personalized therapy has been the backbone for the improved mortality and morbidity figure in cancer especially with reference to acute leukemia. The same has been supported by evolving research and development in the field of genomics. The newer discoveries of mutations and the account of already discovered mutations have been playing a pivotal role to refine management strategy. Here, in this review, we are giving an account of relevant mutations and their potential role in the pathogenesis of acute leukemia. The article discusses the old and newly discovered mutations in acute myeloid/lymphoblastic leukemia. The various pathways and cross-talks between the mutations have been briefly described to develop insight towards their contributory and consequent role in the neoplastic process. The article is to sensitize the students, clinicians, and researchers towards the recent updates and development in genomics of acute leukemia.

14.
Obstet Gynecol Sci ; 64(2): 174-189, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33499580

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide. It is still a pandemic and poses major health problem across the globe. In our review, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of COVID-19 patients were compiled systematically, with special reference to pregnant women in order to understand the disease course. An extensive literature search on various scientific databases for relevant manuscripts was conducted, which yielded 7 manuscripts for final analysis. The most common symptoms were fever (85%), cough (70.63%), chest tightness (37.36%), expectoration (33.27%), fatigue (32%), dyspnea (31.95%), and shortness of breath (31.19%), while hemoptysis (1.0%) was the least common. The associated comorbidities were hypertension (21.6%) and diabetes (10.0%). In terms of hematological parameters, lower total leukocyte counts were observed in 65% of cases and biochemical parameters, patients demonstrated elevated levels of albumin (53.72%), lactate dehydrogenase (45.71%), and natriuretic peptide (34.84%); however, total bilirubin was elevated in only 8% of cases. In the acute inflammatory cytokine profile, C-reactive protein (59.0%), tumor necrosis factor (58.0%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (57.0%), interleukin-2 (IL- 2, 54.0%), and IL-6 (52.0%) levels were increased, while prolactin levels (6.5%) were minimally elevated. The recovery rate was approximately 41%, and mortality was about 6.5%. The study also concluded that the clinical symptoms of COVID-19 were similar among pregnant and non-pregnant women. There was no evidence of vertical transmission of COVID-19 infection. This review critically analyzed COVID-19 as a public health hazard in order to help policy makers, health care givers, and primary physicians to promote early diagnosis and prevention.

15.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 153: 103015, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32563131

ABSTRACT

Efficacy of neo-adjuvant therapy depends on the used regimens. There are contradictory findings regarding relative efficacy of these regimens. Accordingly, present study assessed the relative efficacy of Anthracyclines, Taxanes and added targeted therapies in neo-adjuvant setting simultaneously with a focus on tumor response and breast conserving surgery among breast cancer patients. The network meta-analysis model was used. Ranking of treatment was done by surface under cumulative ranking curve for each regimen. Out of 1286 screened records obtained by searching PubMed and Cochrane register of controlled trials, a total of 34 studies randomizing 12,630 breast cancer patients were included. Network meta-analysis for pathological complete response (pCR) revealed Addition of targeted therapies especially Trastuzumab for HER2+ breast cancer and Bevacizumab for HER2- breast cancer along with Anthracyclines and/or Taxanes based chemotherapy significantly improves pCR but with increased haematological toxicities. All the regimens performed similar in terms of breast conserving surgery rates.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use
17.
Indian J Med Res ; 152(5): 468-474, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33707388

ABSTRACT

This document aims to assist oncologists in making clinical decisions encountered while managing their patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), specific to Indian practice, based on consensus among experts. Most patients are staged by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system which comprises patient performance status, Child-Pugh status, number and size of nodules, portal vein invasion and metastasis. Patients should receive multidisciplinary care. Surgical resection and transplant forms the mainstay of curative treatment. Ablative techniques are used for small tumours (<3 cm) in patients who are not candidates for surgical resection (Child B and C). Patients with advanced (HCC should be assessed on an individual basis to determine whether targeted therapy, interventional radiology procedures or best supportive care should be provided. In advanced HCC, immunotherapy, newer targeted therapies and modern radiation therapy have shown promising results. Patients should be offered regular surveillance after completion of curative resection or treatment of advanced disease.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Consensus , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Staging
18.
Int J Dermatol ; 59(4): 494-505, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extraocular sebaceous carcinoma (EOSC) is an aggressive malignancy of the sebaceous gland. Surgery is considered the cornerstone of treatment, but there is lack of clarity about extent and adjuvant treatment. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and analysis of individual patient data of all published cases of EOSC to look into demography, pattern of care, importance of type of surgery, and other adjuvant treatment and survival outcome. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar was done with the key words sebaceous carcinoma, extraocular sebaceous carcinoma, and Muir-Torre syndrome till December 2017. The data were compiled in an Excel chart and analyzed using SPSS IBM software. RESULTS: Data of 206 patients were retrieved. Median age at presentation was 65 years (range: 11-96 years). Surgery was performed in all except 13 patients. Of these 13, eight were deemed inoperable for extensive disease, and five had metastatic disease. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 84 months (95% CI: 10-158 months) and 92 months (95% CI: 59-126 months). Univariate analysis revealed significantly poor survival for patients with a metastatic disease, regional nodal metastasis, and those with Mohs micrographic or incomplete surgery. CONCLUSION: EOSC is a disease of elderly patients with good prognosis. Complete surgery with regional lymph node dissection is standard treatment. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy is debatable but can be considered in patients with incomplete surgery or high-risk factors.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous/therapy , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/therapy , Sebaceous Glands/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Mohs Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/mortality , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Sebaceous Glands/pathology , Young Adult
19.
Lancet Oncol ; 20(11): e637-e644, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31674322

ABSTRACT

Efforts are being made to scale up human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescent girls in India. Bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines were licensed in the country in 2008, and a nonavalent vaccine was licensed in 2018. Demonstration projects initiated in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat in 2009 introduced HPV vaccination in public health services in India. Following a few deaths in these projects, although subsequently deemed unrelated to vaccination, HPV vaccination in research projects was suspended. This suspension by default resulted in some participants in a trial evaluating two versus three doses receiving only one dose. Since 2016, the successful introduction of HPV vaccination in immunisation programmes in Punjab and Sikkim (with high coverage and safety), government-sponsored opportunistic vaccination in Delhi, prospects of a single dose providing protection, and future availability of an affordable Indian vaccine shows promise for future widespread implementation and evaluation of HPV vaccination in India.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication , Immunization Programs , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination , Female , Health Policy , Humans , India/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Policy Making , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects
20.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 15(5): 1005-1010, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31603102

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In a previous study, we demonstrated clinical and dosimetric feasibility of single partial arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for accelerated hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to lumpectomy cavity for early breast cancer. In this dosimetric study, we compared dual partial arcs versus single arc. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients for treatment with hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy with SIB using VMAT were planned with single partial arc in an earlier study, initial result of which is published elsewhere. The comparative dosimetric plan was created using two partial arcs. Skewness and kurtosis test, Paired Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Most planning targets are better achieved with dual arc technique. Coverage of planning target volume (PTV) whole breast (PTVWB) and PTV lumpectomy cavity (PTVBOOST) was significantly improved with dual partial arc without significant difference in conformity index and homogeneity index. Dual arc improved dosimetric parameter significantly. Mean dose (Dmean) and maximum dose (Dmax) of whole breast PTV as well as Dmax of PTVBOOST; ipsilateral and contralateral lung Dmean, Dmax, 5 Gy volume (V5); contralateral lung Dmean, Dmax, V5; Heart V25 and V18; Dmean of 5 mm thickness skin; Dmean and Dmax of ribs; and Dmean and Dmax of contralateral breast were improved with dual arc. CONCLUSION: This is first of its kind study establishing the advantage of dual partial arcs in the current context. Dual partial arcs improved dosimetry over single partial arc. Significant dose reduction can be achieved for multiple crucial organs at risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast/radiation effects , Breast/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Lung/radiation effects , Lung/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Radiometry/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...