Evaluation of Endpoints Used in Clinical Trials on Adenomyosis - A Systematic Review.

Adenomyosis lacks approved pharmacological treatment even after decades of its identification. We performed this study to review the status of clinical research on adenomyosis for finding an effective drug therapy and to identify the most common endpoints used in adenomyosis trials. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov registries to identify interventional trials for analysis without any time and language restrictions. Our search revealed that barely 15 drugs have been assessed for the management of adenomyosis from 2001 to 2021. Among these, LNG-IUS was found to be the most evaluated drug, followed by dienogest. In these trials, the most commonly assessed endpoints included VAS, NPRS for pain, haemoglobin and PBAC for menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, and serum estradiol. There appears to be a need for developing a comprehensive score that takes into consideration all disease symptoms as well as incorporates some objective elements to evaluate the disease.

Evaluation of pharmacological interventions in the management of adenomyosis: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Medical management of adenomyosis largely revolves around symptom management, with very few drugs having received regulatory approval for the disease. However, the level of evidence supporting the use of pharmacological interventions is low, making it difficult to establish their efficacy in the treatment of adenomyosis. Hence, the aim of our systematic review is to identify the strength of evidence currently available and evaluate the effectiveness of different medical interventions in the management of adenomyosis. METHODS: The search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles published between 1 January 2010 and 30 November 2020 were considered. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed the efficacy of medical interventions in patients with adenomyosis were included. The quality of the data was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: LNG-IUS (levonorgestrel intrauterine system), dienogest and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues were effective in reducing pain, uterine volume and menstrual bleeding. However, these data were largely obtained in the non-trial setting and were fraught with issues that included patient selection, short duration of therapy, small sample size, and limited long-term safety and effectiveness data. CONCLUSIONS: Although LNG-IUS, dienogest and GnRH analogues have better evidence for effectiveness in adenomyosis, the need of the hour is to thoroughly evaluate other novel molecules for adenomyosis using well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Phenytoin induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome-toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Overlap Exacerbated by Cephalexin in a 65-Year-old Neurosurgical Patient: A Rare Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: To report a rare case of drug induced overlap of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrosis Syndrome exacerbated by cephalexin. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we present a 65-year-old female who had come to the hospital with complaints of Sloughing of the skin and redness all over the body with raised body temperature. She was on therapeutic Phenytoin to prevent the post-surgical complications of Communicating Hydrocephalus. After a detailed examination, it was found that the patient had misemployed with an overdose of Phenytoin. The patient was found with nikolsky sign and diagnosed as Stevens- Johnson syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrosis overlap. This case report emphasizes phenytoin induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrosis syndrome exacerbated by cephalexin. CONCLUSION: By witnessing this phenomenon, we could figure out the association between cephalexin and Stevens-Johnson syndrome- Toxic Epidermal Necrosis syndrome overlap. The Immediate dismissal of the offending agent and commencement of supportive care was found to be effective.

Role of fluoxetine in pharmacological enhancement of motor functions in stroke patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is the primary cause of disability worldwide, the second most common cause of dementia and the third leading cause of death. Only few studies were conducted to study the role of fluoxetine in motor recovery in either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients with probably less severe paresis. However, the current study evaluates both the effectiveness and safety of fluoxetine in the stroke population with a more severe motor deficit. METHODS: Patients who had acute or subacute stroke with hemiparesis and aged between 18 and 80 years with medical research council (MRC) scale score <4 were included in this randomized, Single-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 1:1 ratio to placebo or fluoxetine 20 mg/day orally for 90 days. The primary outcome measures were changes in barthel index, time taken to complete nine hole peg test and number of hand tapping movements in 30 s by the affected limb between baseline, 45th day and 90th day. The secondary outcome measure was evaluation of the drug tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were assigned to fluoxetine (n = 84) or placebo (n = 84) group. Mean BI score significantly improved at 90th day in fluoxetine group (70.42 ± 10.56) than in placebo group (44.23 ± 8.52). Mean dexterity value decreased significantly at 90th day (2.61 ± 0.81) compared to baseline (3.98 ± 0.53) in fluoxetine group. However higher rate of decrease of mean dexterity value was seen in fluoxetine group when compared to placebo group. Mean number of hands tapping movements in 30 s increased significantly at 90th day (16.33 ± 3.58) compared to baseline (9.83 ± 2.92) in fluoxetine group. Few ADR reported during this study were dizziness, drowsiness and insomnia. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that early prescription of fluoxetine is safe and may enhance motor function in patients presenting with severe motor impairments after stroke. However, the findings of the study should be confirmed in future controlled studies with large sample size.

Pharmacist led intervention towards management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and assessment of patient satisfaction of care - A prospective, randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus, a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia is due to impaired insulin secretion and deficiency. Though effective current drug therapies are available for diabetes, yet glycaemic maintenance remains a challenge without medication adherence. This necessitates a holistic approach to improve clinical outcomes for a better patient health care. METHODS: A prospective, interventional, randomized controlled study was conducted among 97 type 2 diabetic patients for 6 months. The primary outcome measures included patient satisfaction of care assessment by diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) and medication adherence by medication adherence rating scale (MARS). Secondary outcomes included assessment of knowledge, attitude, and perception and laboratory parameters. The collected data was analyzed using paired and unpaired T-test. RESULTS: Of 97 patients randomized to group A (n = 49) and group B (n = 48), there were 3 and 1 drop-out in group A and B, respectively. The mean age of patients was found to be 56.82 ± 4.06 years. At the 6thmonth follow up, significant improvement of glycaemic parameters was observed in group A vs B. Mean MARS and DTSQ scores also improved in group A vs. B (P-value <0.05). CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-provided counselling improves patient compliance, quality of life and satisfaction of care in diabetic patients.

Dupilumab in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Asthma: An Evidence-Based Review.

BACKGROUND: Asthma affects millions of patients across the globe and also accounts for numerous mortalities every year. The current pharmacologic approach to the treatment of asthma includes the use of glucocorticoids and beta-agonists mainly. However, these conventional therapies have poor controllability of moderate-to-severe asthma and also produce several side effects on their long-term use. These limitations had led to the development of biologics targeting the mediators involved in T helper 2-inflammation associated with the pathogenesis of asthma such as interleukin (IL) 4, IL-5, and IL-13. dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, an IL-4 receptor alpha-antagonist targeting IL-13 and IL-4 has a potential role in treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on October 19, 2018. The dual-antagonistic action of dupilumab on IL-4 and IL-13 receptors renders it more efficient in asthma treatment. OBJECTIVES: To review the efficacy and safety profile of dupilumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma. METHODS: Systematic search was performed via PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the key words dupilumab, moderate-to-severe asthma, interleukin, IL-13, IL-4, and monoclonal antibody. Randomized controlled trials that compared between placebo and dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled asthma were included and observational studies were excluded in this review. RESULTS: The review of selected literature reveals that addition of dupilumab to conventional therapy improves forced expiratory volume in 1 second and reduces the risk of severe asthma exacerbations in patients. No significant differences in incidence of adverse drug reactions/adverse drug events were observed between dupilumab and placebo groups except higher rates of injection site reactions in the dupilumab group. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of dupilumab with long-acting beta agonists used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Although dupilumab has a promising role in treatment of patients with asthma, it is still in the emerging stage for its acceptance globally. Ongoing studies will help to determine dupilumab's long-term efficacy and safety for its future extensive use.