Evaluation of a dedicated outpatient hip fracture clinic.

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of guidance on how to manage the multiple post-discharge issues of older people following minimal trauma hip fracture. We developed a geriatrician-staffed outpatient service for people aged ≥65 years admitted with a hip fracture who were not discharged to a nursing home. We aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of the addition of a dedicated hip fracture follow-up clinic by measuring the actions performed by such a clinic. METHODS: We evaluated the potential benefit of the clinic through a retrospective review of the medical records of all those referred to the clinic over a 2-year period. RESULTS: A total of 80 people were provided a clinic appointment, with 43 (54%) attending. The median age of clinic attendees was 81 years. A total of 40/43 (93%) of attendees received inpatient rehabilitation in a sub-acute facility before discharge. At the dedicated outpatient clinic, multiple issues were identified and managed including further fall reduction strategies (n = 12), commencement of anti-resorptive medications (n = 11) and medication deprescribing (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the introduction of a dedicated hip fracture outpatient clinic identified and managed a broad range of issues. It is unclear if these needs would have been met by previously existing services. Further work is required to clarify whether managing these issues translates into improved patient outcomes and whether a dedicated clinic is a cost-effective practice of achieving this.

Laboratory-derived early warning score for the prediction of in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit admission, medical emergency team activation and cardiac arrest in general medical wards.

BACKGROUND: General medical wards admit a varied cohort of patients from the emergency department, some of whom deteriorate during their hospital stay. Currently, we use vital signs based warning scores to predict patients at risk of imminent deterioration, but there is now a growing body of literature that commonly available laboratory results may also help to identify those at risk. AIM: To assess whether a laboratory-based admission score can predict in hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, medical emergency team (MET) activation or cardiac arrest in a cohort of Australian general medical patients admitted through the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of all general medical admissions to hospital through the ED in 2015. Admission pathology was used to calculate a risk score. In-patient outcomes of death, ICU transfer, MET call activation or cardiac arrest were collected from hospital records. RESULTS: We studied 2942 admissions derived from 2521 patients, with a median age of 81 years. There were 143 in-patient deaths, 82 ICU admissions, 277 MET calls and 14 cardiac arrest calls. The laboratory-based admission score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.80) for inpatient death, an AUC-ROC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66-0.93) for inpatient cardiac arrest, an AUC-ROC of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58-0.70) for ICU transfer and an AUC-ROC of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.55-0.62) for MET call activation. When patients aged over 75 were analysed separately, the AUC-ROC for prediction of in-patient death was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.78) and increased to 0.86 (95% CI: 0.73-0.98) for the prediction of in-patient cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: A simple laboratory-derived score obtained at patient admission is a fair to good predictor of subsequent in-patient death or cardiac arrest in general medical patients and in the older patient cohort. Prospective interventional studies are required to ascertain the clinical utility of this admission score.