ABSTRACT
Antimicrobial resistance may develop in nature including in hospital wastewater through horizontal genetic transfer. Few studies were conducted on the antimicrobial resistance genes in hospital wastewater and wastewater isolates in Indonesia. The prevalence and abundance of beta-lactam resistance genes in hospital wastewater and Enterobacterales wastewater isolates were investigated. Twelve wastewater samples were collected from an influent wastewater treatment plant. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated from the wastewater samples by culture-based methods. DNA was extracted from wastewater samples and the isolates. Nineteen beta-lactam resistance genes were tested by a high throughput qRT-PCR method. blaGES and blaTEM were the most abundant genes detected in hospital wastewater and Escherichia coli, respectively (p < 0.001). The relative abundance of blaCMY_2, blaCTX-M5, blaCTX-M8, blaGES, blaNDM, and blaSHV11 in Klebsiella pneumoniae was higher than in the wastewater and Escherichia coli (p < 0.001; p = 0.006; p = 0.012; p < 0.001; p = 0.005; p < 0.001). Klebsiella pneumoniae might be associated with resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, and cefepime (p < 0.001; p = 0.001; p < 0.001). In conclusion, ESBL genes showed higher abundance than carbapenemase genes in hospital wastewater samples. The ESBL-producing bacteria that were predominantly found in hospital wastewater may originate from clinical specimens. The culture-independent antibiotic resistance monitoring system might be developed as an early warning system for the increasing beta-lactam resistance level in clinical settings.
ABSTRACT
The most prevalent consequence of diabetes mellitus is diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Prior to the final treatment established by the culture findings, the early identification of infections may be used as a prescription for an empirical therapy. This study examines the microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the bacteria that cause DFI. Methods: This research aims to determine the culture and sensitivity trend of aerobic bacterial isolates of DFI in Asian nations over a 5-year period. The article was searched using PubMed and Google Scholar with the keywords 'Diabetic Foot Infections', 'Antibiotic', 'Microbiological Profile', and their combinations. The author uses publications from 2018 to 2022 in Indonesian and English to select the appropriate journal. Results: The author identified 11 relevant articles with microbiological profiles and sensitivity patterns in DFI. A total of 3097 isolates were found in 2498 patients with DFI. Gram-negative bacteria were the leading source of infection (n=1737; 56%). Totally, 1148 (or 37%) of all isolates were aerobic Gram-positive cocci. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated aerobe (n=608, 20%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=451, 15%). Gram-positive bacteria showed good susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, vancomycin, and linezolid. Gram-negative bacteria displayed excellent susceptibility to aminoglycosides, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems. Conclusions: Gram-negative microorganisms were the most prevalent cause of DFI. This study's findings will facilitate the development of future empirical therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of DFI.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is recognized as an important measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers is associated with their knowledge and perception. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three different educational programs on improving hand hygiene compliance, knowledge, and perception among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in Indonesia. METHODS: The study was performed from May to October 2014 and divided into a pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention phase. This cluster randomized controlled trial allocated the implementation of three interventions to the departments, including role model training-pediatrics, active presentation-surgery, a combination of role model training and active presentation-internal medicine, and a control group-obstetrics-gynecology. Both direct observation and knowledge-perception survey of hand hygiene were performed using WHO tools. RESULTS: Hand hygiene compliance was observed during 2,766 hand hygiene opportunities, and knowledge-perception was assessed among 196 participants in the pre-intervention and 88 in the post-intervention period. After intervention, the hand hygiene compliance rate improved significantly in pediatrics (24.1% to 43.7%; P < 0.001), internal medicine (5.2% to 18.5%; P < 0.001), and obstetrics-gynecology (10.1% to 20.5%; P < 0.001). The nurses' incorrect use of hand rub while wearing gloves increased as well (P < 0.001). The average knowledge score improved from 5.6 (SD = 2.1) to 6.2 (SD = 1.9) (P < 0.05). In the perception survey, "strong smell of hand alcohol" as a reason for non-compliance increased significantly in the departments with intervention (10.1% to 22.9%; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The educational programs improved the hand hygiene compliance and knowledge among healthcare workers in two out of three intervention departments in a limited-resource hospital in Indonesia. Role model training had the most impact in this setting. However, adjustments to the strategy are necessary to further improve hand hygiene.
