Vertical Relationship Ratio (VRR): A High Reliability and Accuracy Radiographic Measurement for Basilar Invagination in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND Previous radiographic measurements for diagnosis of a basilar invagination or impression (BI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were used as reference values based on anatomical reference distances. Due to the obscured anatomical landmarks, our group proposed a new radiographic measurement based on anatomic ratios to identify BI. MATERIAL AND METHODS The vertical relationship ratio (VRR) was developed and evaluated. The VRR is the relationship between the distance obtained with the modified Ranawat method and the C3 vertebral body height. VRR was used to assess its ability to distinguish BI in 3 patient groups (28 RA with BI, 37 RA without BI, and 56 non-RA patients). The intra- and inter-observer reliability, the sensitivities, and specificities of all measurements were analyzed. The cutoff value of VRR measurement was calculated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS The VRR measurement showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliabilities. The VRR could significantly distinguish RA patients with BI from RA patients without BI. The mean VRR of RA patients with BI (1.82±0.20) was less than for the non-RA patients (2.26±0.19) and the RA patients without BI (2.24±0.19). The cutoff value of VRR from the ROC curve was below 2.025. Its sensitivity was 92.85%, specificity was 97.85%, positive predictive value was 92.86%, and negative predictive value was 97.84%. CONCLUSIONS VRR has excellent intra-/inter-observer reliability and can distinguished BI in RA patients. We recommend using VRR in preference to the other available methods for assessment and screening BI in rheumatoid arthritis.

How Adductor Hallucis Reattachment Affects Outcomes Following Scarf Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Correction: A 4- to 8-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Comparative Study.

This study observed the differences between 2 adductor hallucis release techniques (nonreattachment vs reattachment) in 4- to 8-year follow-up outcomes of scarf osteotomy combined with distal soft tissue release (DSTR) in moderate to severe hallux valgus correction. A retrospective review of moderate to severe hallux valgus patients treated with scarf osteotomy with DSTR was conducted. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on adductor hallucis release techniques (without and with reattachment to the metatarsophalangeal joint capsule). The demographic-matching process divided the samples into 27 patients per group. A comparison of last follow-up of clinical foot ankle ability measure (FAAM) for activity of daily living (ADL) and numerical rating scale for pain during 2 hours of ADL and radiographic outcomes (hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was analyzed. A p < .05 was considered a statistically significant difference. The final follow-up of FAAM for ADL was statistically better in the reattachment group as the median was 79.0 (IQR = 4.00) versus 76.0 (IQR = 4.00), p = .047. However, this difference did not achieve minimal clinical importance difference (MCID). The last follow-up of IMA was also statistically better in the reattachment group as the mean was 7.67 (SD = 3.10) versus 10.5 (SD = 3.59), p = .003. DSTR with adductor hallucis reattachment has statistically better IMA correction and maintenance than nonreattachment for moderate to severe hallux valgus correction using scarf osteotomy at 4- to 8-years follow-up. However, the better clinical outcomes did not achieve MCID.