ABSTRACT
Background: Proper vascular injury risk stratification (VIRS) methods for L4-L5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery have not been well-described. The objective of this study was to propose a novel VIRS method for L4-L5 LLIF surgery via the transpsoas approach. Methods: Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of adult patients were obtained and analyzed. The VIRS scores were assessed using anterior disc line to posterior vessel wall distance, the disc vessel angle (DVA), and the disc edge to vessel distance at the level of L4-L5 disc space. Results: Ninety-one consecutive adult patients were included in the study. The right common iliac vein (CIV) had a high risk of injury with both right- and left-sided approaches. The left CIV had a moderate risk with a left-sided approach when the iliocaval confluence was above the L4-L5 disc space but had a high risk when the confluence was at the L4-L5 disc space. The left CIV had a high risk with a right-sided approach when the confluence was above the L4-L5 disc space but had a moderate risk when the confluence was at the L4-L5 disc space. The inferior vena cava (IVC) had a high risk with both right- and left-sided approaches. The aorta had a moderate risk regardless of the right or left-sided approaches. The left common iliac artery (CIA) had a moderate risk with a right-sided approach and a low risk with a left-sided approach. The right CIA had a low risk with both right- and left-sided approaches. Conclusions: There are significant vascular anatomic variations at the L4-L5 disc level and a proper VIRS can be performed utilizing a combination of anterior disc line to posterior vessel wall distance, DVA, and disc edge to vessel distance, on the axial MRI.
ABSTRACT
Background Since posterior cervical fixation with lateral mass screws was introduced in 1979, multiple techniques have been described in the literature. However, no study to date has determined whether pre-drilling all lateral masses prior to screw insertion has a benefit over the traditional sequential drilling and screw insertion on the alignment of the screw-rod construct. This study sought to determine the efficacy and efficiency in achieving alignment with a novel pre-drilling technique compared to the traditional sequential drilling technique. The authors hypothesized that the novel pre-drilling technique could be applied more quickly and precisely than the traditional sequential drilling technique. Methods Eight cervical spine sawbones models were utilized to place 64 lateral mass screws by two surgeons. The pre-drilling technique was utilized to place 32 screws in four models, and the sequential drilling technique was utilized to place the 32 screws in the remaining four models. In the traditional sequential drilling technique, each lateral mass underwent screw tract preparation and insertion before proceeding to the subsequent vertebra. In the pre-drilling technique, all lateral masses were marked and drilled sequentially before screw placement. CT imaging with 3D reconstructions was generated for all models. Variability in screw placement and time taken to fully instrument the models were compared. Results The mean time to completion of the pre-drilling technique was 337 ± 22 seconds compared to 490 ± 22 seconds with the traditional technique (p<0.01). There was a significantly higher variability in the coronal plane within the traditional group between C5 and C6 compared to other adjacent vertebrae (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the start point variability and the overall tightness of line fit between the techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that a novel pre-drilling technique for lateral mass screw insertion may be more efficient and reliable than the traditional sequential drilling technique. In addition, this technique may reduce the need for rod contouring or additional implants to optimize the alignment of cervical instrumentation. However, further clinical studies are necessary to validate the potential clinical and radiologic benefits of this described technique.
