Spray Cryotherapy for Benign Large Airway Stenosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of Safety and Practice Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Benign airway stenosis (BAS) represents a significant burden on patients, providers, and healthcare systems. Spray cryotherapy (SCT) has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment to reduce BAS recurrence. We sought to examine safety and practice variations of the latest SCT system when used for BAS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study in seven academic institutions within the Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group. All patients who underwent at least one SCT session with a diagnosis of BAS at the time of procedure at these institutions were included. Demographics, procedure characteristics, and adverse events were captured through each center's procedural database and electronic health record. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients underwent 165 procedures involving SCT from 2013 to 2022. The most frequent etiology of BAS was iatrogenic (n = 36, 35%). In most cases, SCT was used prior to other standard BAS interventions (n = 125; 75%). The most frequent SCT actuation time per cycle was five seconds. Pneumothorax complicated four procedures, requiring tube thoracostomy in two. Significant post-SCT hypoxemia was noted in one case, with recovery by case conclusion and no long-term effects. There were no instances of air embolism, hemodynamic compromise, or procedural or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: SCT as an adjunctive treatment for BAS was associated with a low rate of complications in this retrospective multicenter cohort study. SCT-related procedural aspects varied widely in examined cases, including actuation duration, number of actuations, and timing of actuations relative to other interventions.

Diagnostic Yield vs Diagnostic Accuracy for Peripheral Lung Biopsy Evaluation: Evidence Supporting a Future Pragmatic End Point.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic yield and accuracy endpoints have been used inconsistently in the evaluation of advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy devices and techniques, limiting between-study comparisons. In addition, diagnostic accuracy can be adjudicated only after prolonged clinical follow-up, which delays reporting on the performance of novel devices. RESEARCH QUESTION: Will a conservative diagnostic yield definition result in few false-negative initial results to closely approximate diagnostic accuracy and represent a useful outcome for future studies of diagnostic utility? METHODS: Commonly used definitions of diagnostic yield were applied to a prospective data set of consecutive peripheral pulmonary lesions sampled by navigational bronchoscopy from 2017 to 2019. All consider malignancy to be diagnostic but differ in their classification of nonmalignant biopsy findings, which were subcategorized as specific benign, nonspecific benign, or normal lung. Diagnostic yield calculations were also compared with diagnostic accuracy, defined as the proportion of biopsy specimens deemed diagnostic by each definition that were confirmed accurate through 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 450 biopsy specimens of lesions were analyzed. The prevalence of malignancy was 60.9% (274 of 450). On initial bronchoscopy pathology, there were 227 malignant diagnoses (50.4%), with a single false positive (0.4%). Among 104 biopsy specimens with specific benign findings, only two were false negative for malignancy (1.9%). There were 119 nonspecific benign biopsy specimens, with 46 false negatives for malignancy (38.7%). The discrepancy between diagnostic yield and accuracy was 0.7% for the conservative definition, which only considered malignant or specific benign findings as diagnostic. INTERPRETATION: A conservative diagnostic yield definition excluding nonspecific benign diagnoses closely approximated diagnostic accuracy through 2 years' follow-up, with a less than 1% discrepancy. Using this conservative yield definition may allow for dissemination of reliable diagnostic utility data without protracted delays needed for follow-up data in this era of rapid technological change in advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy.

Inter-rater reliability of a novel objective endpoint for benign central airway stenosis interventions: Segmentation-based volume rendering of computed tomography scans.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a novel segmentation-based volume rendering approach for quantification of benign central airway obstruction (BCAO). DESIGN: A retrospective single-center cohort study. SETTING: Data were ascertained using electronic health records at a tertiary academic medical center in the United States. PARTICIPANTS AND INCLUSION: Patients with airway stenosis located within the trachea on two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) imaging and documentation of suspected benign etiology were included. Four readers with varying expertise in quantifying tracheal stenosis severity were selected to manually segment each CT using a volume rendering approach with the available free tools in the medical imaging viewing software OsiriX (Bernex, Switzerland). Three expert thoracic radiologists were recruited to quantify the same CTs using traditional subjective methods on a continuous and categorical scale. OUTCOME MEASURES: The interrater reliability for continuous variables was calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using a two-way mixed model with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria, and fifty CT scans were selected for measurement. The most common etiology of BCAO was iatrogenic in 22 patients (58%). There was an even distribution of chest and neck CT imaging within our cohort. The average ICC across all four readers for the volume rendering approach was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.93), suggesting good to excellent agreement. The average ICC for thoracic radiologists for subjective methods on the continuous scale was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.55), suggesting poor to fair agreement. The kappa for the categorical approach was 0.26, suggesting a slight to fair agreement amongst the raters. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, agreement was good to excellent for raters with varying expertise in airway cross-sectional imaging using a novel segmentation-based volume rendering approach to quantify BCAO. This proposed measurement outperformed our expert thoracic radiologists using conventional subjective grading methods.

Current practices in the management of central airway obstruction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Airway obstruction continues to cause substantial pulmonary morbidity and mortality. We present a review of classic, current, and evolving management techniques, highlighting recently published studies on the topic. Recommendations have historically been primarily based on anecdotal experience, case reports, and retrospective studies, but more solid evidence has emerged in the last decade. RECENT FINDINGS: Novel endobronchial stents are being developed to mitigate the issues of stent migration, mucus plugging, fracture, and granulation tissue formation. Endobronchial drug delivery has become an active area of translational and clinical research, especially with regards to antineoplastic agents used for malignant airway stenosis. Even classic or updated techniques such as spray cryotherapy, injections of mitomycin-c, and balloon dilation have recently been examined in methodologically sound studies. Finally, recently published data have confirmed that patient breathlessness and quality of life improve significantly with therapeutic airway interventions. A multimodal and multidisciplinary approach to patient care is key to achieving the best outcomes. SUMMARY: The treatment of central airway stenosis is often multimodal and should focus on patient-centric factors, taking into account risks and benefits of the procedure, operator, and center expertise, and always occur in the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Evidence-based clinical research is increasingly driving patient management.

Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease and outcomes after hospitalization: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hospitalization on patient outcomes is increasingly recognized and considered in the prognostication of many pulmonary disorders. We sought to evaluate the impact of hospitalization on survival in connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) patients. METHODS: A chart review of patients with CTD-ILD followed at a tertiary care center was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups based on hospitalization status. Outcomes of the groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses as well as multivariate competing risk analysis. RESULTS: There were 137 patients identified with confirmed CTD-ILD. Patients who underwent hospitalization for any reason had a significant decrease in transplant-free survival compared to the never hospitalized cohort (3-year survival 60% vs. 94%; p = 0.0001). Hospitalization for ≥7 days was associated with worse outcomes than those hospitalized for <7 days (median survival 1.59 years vs. 7.17 years, p = 0.0012). Based on multivariate competing risk analysis, factors associated with death, with lung transplantation as a competing risk, were age (HR = 1.05 [95% 1.01-1.09]; P = 0.0443), male gender (HR = 4.94 [95% CI: 1.58-15.41]; P = 0.006), and all cause hospitalization (HR = 11.97 [95% CI: 1.36-105.49]; P = 0.0253). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the impact of hospitalization on subsequent outcomes in the CTD-ILD population with a significantly reduced transplant-free survival demonstrated, especially after cardiopulmonary hospitalization events.