Coherent compounding in doppler imaging.

Coherent compounding can provide high frame rates and wide regions of interest for imaging of blood flow. However, motion will cause out-of-phase summation, potentially causing image degradation. In this work the impact of blood motion on SNR and the accuracy of Doppler velocity estimates are investigated. A simplified model for the compounded Doppler signal is proposed. The model is used to show that coherent compounding acts as a low-pass filter on the coherent compounding Doppler signal, resulting in negatively biased velocity estimates. Simulations and flow phantom experiments are used to quantify the bias and Doppler SNR for different velocities and beam-to-flow (BTF) angles. It is shown that the bias in the mean velocity increases with increasing beam-to-flow angle and/or blood velocity, whereas the SNR decreases; losses up to 4 dB were observed in the investigated scenarios. Further, a 2-D motion correction scheme is proposed based on multi-angle vector Doppler velocity estimates. For a velocity of 1.1 v(Nyq) and a BTF angle of 75°, the bias was reduced from 30% to less than 4% in simulations. The motion correction scheme was also applied to flow phantom and in vivo recordings, in both cases resulting in a substantially reduced mean velocity bias and an SNR less dependent on blood velocity and direction.

Methods for reverberation suppression utilizing dual frequency band imaging.

Reverberations impair the contrast resolution of diagnostic ultrasound images. Tissue harmonic imaging is a common method to reduce these artifacts, but does not remove all reverberations. Dual frequency band imaging (DBI), utilizing a low frequency pulse which manipulates propagation of the high frequency imaging pulse, has been proposed earlier for reverberation suppression. This article adds two different methods for reverberation suppression with DBI: the delay corrected subtraction (DCS) and the first order content weighting (FOCW) method. Both methods utilize the propagation delay of the imaging pulse of two transmissions with alternating manipulation pressure to extract information about its depth of first scattering. FOCW further utilizes this information to estimate the content of first order scattering in the received signal. Initial evaluation is presented where both methods are applied to simulated and in vivo data. Both methods yield visual and measurable substantial improvement in image contrast. Comparing DCS with FOCW, DCS produces sharper images and retains more details while FOCW achieves best suppression levels and, thus, highest image contrast. The measured improvement in contrast ranges from 8 to 27 dB for DCS and from 4 dB up to the dynamic range for FOCW.