The association between health utility and joint status among people with severe haemophilia A: findings from the KAPPA register.

INTRODUCTION: People with severe haemophilia A have reportedly impaired health related quality of life (utility) mainly due to recurrent bleeding, arthropathy and treatment burden. AIM: To estimate utilities and evaluate their potential correlates - most importantly the joint status - among people with severe haemophilia A. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, eligible participants had severe haemophilia A, were aged ≥15, negative for factor VIII inhibitor and included in the KAPPA register of Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Data on demographics, treatment history, haemophilia joint health score, and EQ-5D utility were obtained from the register. We used box plots to present utilities and joint status and ordinary least squares regression to evaluate correlates of utilities. Participants were consecutively enrolled in the KAPPA register between April 2013 and June 2016. RESULTS: Overall, 173 participants with median age of 34 (interquartile range: 25-45) were included. Twelve (6.9%) participants were on episodic treatment while 161 (93.1%) were treated using prophylaxis. Concomitant diseases and positive inhibitor history were reported for 73 (43.2%) and 21 (12.1%) participants, respectively. The highest median utility (1.0) was observed among those aged <29 on prophylaxis and those aged 30-44 who had started prophylaxis by age 3. In the multi-variable regression, joint scores of 16-25 (Coef. -0.18, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.06), 26-35 (Coef. -0.21, 95% CI: -0.36, -0.06) and >35 (Coef. -0.37, 95% CI: -0.52, -0.23) were associated with lower utilities. CONCLUSION: Moderate to severe joint manifestations are associated with reduced utilities among persons with severe haemophilia A.

Hypertension, haematuria and renal functioning in haemophilia - a cross-sectional study in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional, epidemiological study sought to assess the prevalence and extent of potential risk factors for hypertension, particularly renal function related to haematuria and their associations in people with haemophilia. METHODOLOGY: Demographic and medical data were collected at a single time-point in patients with haemophilia over 40 years of age from 16 European centres. Associations with diagnosis of hypertension were tested in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We enrolled 532 patients (median age 52 years, range 40-98) with haemophilia A (n = 467) or haemophilia B (n = 65). Haemophilia was severe (<0.01 IU mL-1 ) in 313 patients (59%). Hypertension was diagnosed in 239 patients (45%). In multivariate analyses, age and body mass index (BMI) were significantly and independently associated with hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 18.1, P < 0.001, in elderly patients and OR = 25.1, P < 0.001, in patients with BMI >30 kg m-2 ). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <70 mL min-1 (OR = 2.7, P = 0.047) was significantly associated with hypertension, but mean eGFR was significantly higher for severe than mild haemophilia. Further variables with OR > 2.8 were diabetes (OR = 2.8, P = 0.04), coronary artery disease (OR = 3.3, P = 0.052) and family history of hypertension (OR = 4.4, P < 0.001). Neither severity of haemophilia nor history of haematuria was significantly associated with hypertension in univariate or multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: As in the general population, age and BMI were major risk factors for hypertension in people with haemophilia. Renal dysfunction was associated with hypertension, but the prevalence of renal dysfunction was not extensive and furthermore not significantly correlated with haematuria. The associations of other variables with hypertension require further studies to confirm causal relationships over time.

How to compare cardiovascular disease and risk factors in elderly patients with haemophilia with the general population.

INTRODUCTION: Studies on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors in patients with haemophilia (PWH) in comparison to the general population have generated inconsistent results. The ADVANCE Working Group collected data on CV comorbidities in PWH aged ≥40 years (H(3) Study). AIM: Identification of German epidemiological data on CVD for the general population, evaluation for appropriateness, and execution of comparisons with PWH. METHODS: Identification of data sources by structured literature (EMBASE, MEDLINE) searches. INCLUSION CRITERIA: German general population, CVD and risk factors, gender/age stratification, sample size >500 male persons, age groups ≥40 years, current data collection, language English/German. Comparison of data on CVD and risk factors in PWH (H(3)  Study) with published German general population data. RESULTS: Criteria for data source appropriateness were defined. Of five national and three international epidemiological studies, the DEGS1 Study (German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults) was identified as the most suitable comparator. Compared with men from DEGS1, hypertension was significantly more prevalent in PWH aged 50-59 years (41.7% [95% CI: 37.3-46.2] vs. 52.0% [95% CI: 43.7-60.1], P = 0.03). Coronary artery/heart disease (CHD) was significantly less prevalent in PWH aged ≥60 years (60-69 years: 19.5% [95% CI: 15.9-23.7] vs. 8.1% [95% CI: 3.3-16.1], P = 0.02; 70-79 years: 30.5% [95% CI: 25.9-35.5] vs. 11.8% [95% CI: 5.2-21.9], P = 0.002). No statistically significant difference for ischaemic cerebrovascular disease/stroke was detected. CONCLUSION: Increased prevalence of hypertension in PWH should trigger regular screening. CHD does occur in PWH aged ≥60 years though apparently with lower prevalence. Given the growing population of elderly PWH, guidelines for prevention and treatment of CVD should be developed.

Real-life evidence in evaluating effectiveness of treatment in Haemophilia A with a recombinant FVIII concentrate: a non-interventional study in emerging countries.

Some progress has been made regarding availability of recombinant factor VIII concentrates and prophylaxis for haemophilia A in emerging countries, where plasma-derived concentrates were used in the vast majority. Clinical studies to document their introduction and effectiveness are so far not widely available in literature. This non-interventional study evaluates the real-life effectiveness and safety of prophylactic and on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VIII formulated with sucrose (rFVIII-FS) for bleed control and preservation of joints in emerging countries from Eastern Europe, North Africa and Middle East area. One hundred and eighty-six patients from 11 countries were enrolled, mean ± SD age 12.8 ± 12.7 years. At enrolment, majority (79.6%) had severe haemophilia A (<2% IU mL(-1) ), 47.8% had a target joint, 15% had an inhibitor history and one patient was on immune tolerance induction. During the 24-month observation period, 58.1% of the patients were prescribed prophylaxis at every visit, 31.7% were on an on-demand regimen. Patients with severe haemophilia A on prophylaxis (n = 82) had a mean annual rate of treated bleeds of 2.8 ± 4.4, whereas it was 19.1 ± 32.0 for the on-demand group (n = 31), and a mean total Gilbert Score of 9.9 ± 10.3 at baseline and 4.1 ± 6.7 at study end; vs. 15.2 ± 17.3 and 13.7 ± 17.1 for on-demand respectively. The majority of the bleeds (91.1%) were treated with one or two infusions. Four patients without inhibitor history had a first positive inhibitor test during the study. This study demonstrates the effective use of rFVIII-FS in emerging countries and adds to the established safety profile of rFVIII-FS.

Continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIII formulated with sucrose in surgery: non-interventional, observational study in patients with severe haemophilia A.

In haemophilia A, continuous infusion (CI) of FVIII perioperatively provides a more constant FVIII level than conventional bolus injections, avoiding low trough levels that could increase bleeding risk. Due to the low number of surgical cases in clinical trials, especially in haemophilia, more information on the clinical practice of CI from observational studies is helpful. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CI with recombinant factor VIII formulated with sucrose (rFVIII-FS) in a typical surgery practice setting. This was a non-interventional study in 12 centres. Patients with severe haemophilia A who received rFVIII-FS by CI during and after surgery were included in this study if they had more than 150 exposure days (EDs) to any FVIII product and had no history of inhibitors before CI. Patients were observed during the entire course of CI, with monitoring up to 3 months thereafter. Twenty-five patients with 28 surgeries were included in the analysis. Median age was 51.7 (range 10-75). Most (75%; 21/25) patients underwent orthopaedic surgeries. The median dose of rFVIII-FS consumed during CI was 376 IU kg(-1) (range 157.9-3605.6 IU kg(-1)) with a greater median dose for orthopaedic surgeries (424.0 IU kg(-1)) compared to non-orthopaedic surgeries (278.5 IU kg(-1)). 95% of all FVIII measurements (214/224) were on target. Efficacy and tolerability were rated as good/excellent in 89.3% (25/28) of surgeries. No inhibitors were observed during or after surgery. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of CI with rFVIII-FS during surgery in patients with severe haemophilia A in a clinical practice setting.