Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust Fam Physician ; 30(5): 504-7, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11432027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The General Practice Evaluation Program (GPEP) provided competitive funding for general practice research from 1990-1999. METHODS: Projects funded by GPEP between November 1990 and December 1999 were audited to determine the extent of randomised trials and other interventional studies. RESULTS: Thirty-three (13%) of the 248 projects were interventional studies; of these 21 (8% of all projects) were randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: While GPEP has made a significant contribution toward Australian general practice research, few randomised trials and other interventional studies have been funded. Reasons include the specific evaluative focus and restrictions on project duration and funding. Randomised trials should be supported within future general practice research funding.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Support as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Australia , Female , Health Services Research/economics , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...