ABSTRACT
Surface layer optical turbulence values in the form of the refractive index structure function C n2 are often calculated from surface layer temperature, moisture, and wind characteristics and compared to measurements from sonic anemometers, differential temperature sensors, and imaging systems. A key derived component needed in the surface layer turbulence calculations is the sensible heat value. Typically, the sensible heat is calculated using the bulk aerodynamic method that assumes a certain surface roughness and a friction velocity that approximates the turbulence drag on temperature and moisture mixing from the change in the average surface layer vertical wind velocity. These assumptions/approximations generally only apply in free convection conditions. To obtain the sensible heat, a more robust method, which applies when free convection conditions are not occurring, is via an energy balance method such as the Bowen ratio method. The use of the Bowen ratio--the ratio of sensible heat flux to latent heat flux--allows a more direct assessment of the optical turbulence-driving surface layer sensible heat flux than do more traditional assessments of surface layer sensible heat flux. This study compares surface layer C n2 values using sensible heat values from the bulk aerodynamic and energy balance methods to quantifications from sonic anemometers posted at different heights on a sensor tower. The research shows that the sensible heat obtained via the Bowen ratio method provides a simpler, more reliable, and more accurate way to calculate surface layer C n2 values than what is required to make such calculations from bulk aerodynamic method-obtained sensible heat.
