Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Benef Microbes ; 8(4): 563-567, 2017 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28726512

ABSTRACT

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are structurally diverse unconjugated glycans with a composition unique to each lactating mother. While HMOs have been shown to have an impact on the development of infant gut microbiota, it is not well known if HMOs also already affect milk microbial composition. To address this question, we analysed eleven colostrum samples for HMO content by high-pressure liquid chromatography and microbiota composition by quantitative PCR. Higher total HMO concentration was associated with higher counts of Bifidobacterium spp. (ρ=0.63, P=0.036). A distinctive effect was seen when comparing different HMO groups: positive correlations were observed between sialylated HMOs and Bifidobacterium breve (ρ=0.84, P=0.001), and non-fucosylated/non-sialylated HMOs and Bifidobacterium longum group (ρ=0.65, P=0.030). In addition to associations between HMOs and bifidobacteria, positive correlations were observed between fucosylated HMOs and Akkermansia muciniphila (ρ=0.70, P=0.017), and between fucosylated/sialylated HMOs and Staphylococcus aureus (ρ=0.75, P=0.007). Our results suggest that the characterised HMOs have an effect on specific microbial groups in human milk. Both oligosaccharides and microbes provide a concise inoculum for the compositional development of the infant gut microbiota.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Colostrum/microbiology , Microbiota , Milk, Human/chemistry , Oligosaccharides/analysis , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Colostrum/chemistry , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lactation , Male , Milk, Human/microbiology , Probiotics/administration & dosage
2.
Acta Paediatr ; 106(7): 1103-1109, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28316118

ABSTRACT

AIM: Preterm infants display aberrant gut microbial colonisation. We investigated whether the differences in gut microbiota between late preterm and full-term infants results from prematurity or external exposures. METHODS: This study comprised 43 late preterm infants (340/7 -366/7 ) and 75 full-term infants based on faecal samples collected following birth and at two to four weeks and six months of age. We assessed clinically relevant bacteria using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether the observed differences in gut microbiota were attributable to prematurity or perinatal exposure. RESULTS: The prevalence of bifidobacteria differed in the intestinal microbiota of the full-term and late preterm neonates. Differences in the presence of specific species were detected at the age of six months, although the microbiota alterations were most prominent following delivery. As well as prematurity, the mode of birth, intrapartum and neonatal antibiotic exposure, and the duration of breastfeeding had an additional impact on gut microbiota development. CONCLUSION: The gut microbiota composition was significantly different between late preterm and full-term infants at least six months after birth. Antibiotic exposure was common in late preterm infants and modulated gut colonisation, but preterm birth also affected gut microbiota development independently.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Infant, Premature , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Young Adult
3.
Benef Microbes ; 7(3): 353-62, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26839074

ABSTRACT

Successful human reproduction requires microbial homeostasis in the female reproductive tract, and colonisation of the newborn with beneficial microbes. In order to prevent several complications associated with dysbiosis, the administration of probiotics is more often being considered. The objective of the enclosed review was to examine the rationale for probiotic utility before and during pregnancy and in the early phase of infant life. The conclusions emerged from a panel of researchers who met during the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) workshop held in Washington, DC, USA in 2015. The group concluded based upon the current literature, that a case can be made for the use of a specific sets of probiotic organisms during the first 1,500 days of life, with the goal of a healthy pregnancy to term, and a healthy start to life with lowered risk of infections and inflammatory events. The key to successfully translating these recommendations to practice is that products be made available and affordable to women in developed and developing countries.


Subject(s)
Dysbiosis/prevention & control , Infant Health , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Probiotics/administration & dosage , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome , United States
4.
J Dev Orig Health Dis ; 7(1): 5-14, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26051698

ABSTRACT

The significance of contact with microbes in early life for subsequent health has been the subject of intense research during the last 2 decades. Disturbances in the establishment of the indigenous intestinal microbiome caused by cesarean section delivery or antibiotic exposure in early life have been linked to the risk of immune-mediated and inflammatory conditions such as atopic disorders, inflammatory bowel disease and obesity later in life. Distinct microbial populations have recently been discovered at maternal sites including the amniotic cavity and breast milk, as well as meconium, which have previously been thought to be sterile. Our understanding of the impact of fetal microbial contact on health outcomes is still rudimentary. Breast milk is known to modulate immune and metabolic programming. The breast milk microbiome is hypothesized to guide infant gut colonization and is affected by maternal health status and mode of delivery. Immunomodulatory factors in breast milk interact with the maternal and infant gut microbiome and may mediate some of the health benefits associated with breastfeeding. The intimate connection between the mother and the fetus or the infant is a potential target for microbial therapeutic interventions aiming to support healthy microbial contact and protect against disease.


Subject(s)
Child Health , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Infant, Newborn/immunology , Milk, Human/microbiology , Animals , Breast Feeding , Female , Humans , Immunomodulation , Pregnancy , Probiotics
5.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 17(8): 713-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25885278

ABSTRACT

Overweight and obesity currently constitute a major threat to human well-being. Almost half of the female population are currently overweight. Pregnant overweight women are at risk of gestational diabetes affecting the health of the mother and the child, in both the short and long term. Notwithstanding the extensive scientific interest centred on the problem, research efforts have thus far been unable to devise preventive strategies. Recent scientific advances point to a gut microbiota dysbiosis, with ensuing low-grade inflammation as a contributing element, in obesity and its comorbidities. Such findings would suggest a role for specific probiotics in the search for preventive and therapeutic adjunct applications in gestational diabetes. The aim of the present paper was to critically review recent demonstrations of the role of intestinal microbes in immune and metabolic regulation, which could be exploited in nutritional management of pregnant women by probiotic bacteria. By modulating specific target functions, probiotic dietary intervention may exert clinical effects beyond the nutritional impact of food. As this approach in pregnancy is new, an overview of the role of gut microbiota in shaping host metabolism, together with the definition of probiotics are presented, and finally, specific targets and potential mechanisms for probiotics in pregnancy are discussed. Pregnancy appears to be the most critical stage for interventions aiming to reduce the risk of non-communicable disease in future generations, beyond the immediate dangers attributable to the health of the mother, labour and the neonate. Specific probiotic interventions during pregnancy provide an opportunity, therefore, to promote the health not only of the mother but also of the child.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Diabetes, Gestational/microbiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestines/microbiology , Overweight/complications , Overweight/microbiology , Pregnancy , Probiotics/metabolism
6.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 38(8): 1342-8, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18477013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effects of breastfeeding and probiotics on infant sensitization still remain discrepant. OBJECTIVE: To explore probable explanatory factors in infant sensitization and the protective effect of probiotics. METHODS: Altogether 171 mother-infant pairs from an ongoing placebo-controlled double-blind study with nutrition modulation by dietary counselling and probiotic supplementation were studied. Skin prick testing was done in infants at 6 and 12 months and in mothers at third trimester of pregnancy. The breast milk concentrations of cytokines TGF-beta2, soluble CD14, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-10, IL-6, IL-4 and IL-2 were measured. RESULTS: The risk of sensitization increased in infants with allergic mothers breastfeeding over 6 months [odds ratio (OR=4.83, P=0.005)], or exclusively breastfeeding over 2.5 months (OR=3.4, P=0.018). Probiotic supplementation had a protective effect against sensitization in infants with a high hereditary risk due to maternal sensitization (OR=0.3, P=0.023). The concentration of TGF-beta2 tended to be higher in the colostrum of the mothers in the probiotic group as compared with those on placebo (probiotic/placebo ratio=1.50, P=0.073). A similar result was obtained in the subgroup of allergic mothers (probiotic/placebo ratio=1.56, P=0.094). CONCLUSION: Infants of atopic mothers, specifically when breastfed exclusively over 2.5 months or totally over 6 months, had a higher risk of sensitization at the age of 12 months. This risk could be reduced by the use of probiotics during pregnancy and lactation, partly by resulting in a beneficial composition of the breast milk.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Dietary Supplements , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diet therapy , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/prevention & control , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Cytokines/analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Milk, Human/chemistry , Milk, Human/immunology , Mothers , Pregnancy , Skin Tests
7.
Gut ; 53(10): 1391-3, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15361481

ABSTRACT

The notion of food allergy in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is not new. However, recent evidence suggests significant reduction in IBS symptom severity in patients on elimination diets, provided that dietary elimination is based on foods against which the individual had raised IgG antibodies. These findings should encourage studies dissecting the mechanisms responsible for IgG production against dietary antigens and their putative role in IBS


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/biosynthesis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...