Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Prateek Singh; Rajat Ujjainiya; Satyartha Prakash; Salwa Naushin; Viren Sardana; Nitin Bhatheja; Ajay Pratap Singh; Joydeb Barman; Kartik Kumar; Raju Khan; Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka; Mahesh Anumalla; Amit Lahiri; Susanta Kar; Vivek Bhosale; Mrigank Srivastava; Madhav Nilakanth Mugale; C.P Pandey; Shaziya Khan; Shivani Katiyar; Desh Raj; Sharmeen Ishteyaque; Sonu Khanka; Ankita Rani; Promila; Jyotsna Sharma; Anuradha Seth; Mukul Dutta; Nishant Saurabh; Murugan Veerapandian; Ganesh Venkatachalam; Deepak Bansal; Dinesh Gupta; Prakash M Halami; Muthukumar Serva Peddha; Gopinath M Sundaram; Ravindra P Veeranna; Anirban Pal; Ranvijay Kumar Singh; Suresh Kumar Anandasadagopan; Parimala Karuppanan; Syed Nasar Rahman; Gopika Selvakumar; Subramanian Venkatesan; MalayKumar Karmakar; Harish Kumar Sardana; Animika Kothari; DevendraSingh Parihar; Anupma Thakur; Anas Saifi; Naman Gupta; Yogita Singh; Ritu Reddu; Rizul Gautam; Anuj Mishra; Avinash Mishra; Iranna Gogeri; Geethavani Rayasam; Yogendra Padwad; Vikram Patial; Vipin Hallan; Damanpreet Singh; Narendra Tirpude; Partha Chakrabarti; Sujay Krishna Maity; Dipyaman Ganguly; Ramakrishna Sistla; Narender Kumar Balthu; Kiran Kumar A; Siva Ranjith; Vijay B Kumar; Piyush Singh Jamwal; Anshu Wali; Sajad Ahmed; Rekha Chouhan; Sumit G Gandhi; Nancy Sharma; Garima Rai; Faisal Irshad; Vijay Lakshmi Jamwal; MasroorAhmad Paddar; Sameer Ullah Khan; Fayaz Malik; Debashish Ghosh; Ghanshyam Thakkar; Saroj K Barik; Prabhanshu Tripathi; Yatendra Kumar Satija; Sneha Mohanty; Md. Tauseef Khan; Umakanta Subudhi; Pradip Sen; Rashmi Kumar; Anshu Bhardwaj; Pawan Gupta; Deepak Sharma; Amit Tuli; Saumya Ray Chaudhuri; Srinivasan Krishnamurthi; Prakash L; Ch V Rao; B N Singh; Arvindkumar Chaurasiya; Meera Chaurasiyar; Mayuri Bhadange; Bhagyashree Likhitkar; Sharada Mohite; Yogita Patil; Mahesh Kulkarni; Rakesh Joshi; Vaibhav Pandya; Amita Patil; Rachel Samson; Tejas Vare; Mahesh Dharne; Ashok Giri; Shilpa Paranjape; G. Narahari Sastry; Jatin Kalita; Tridip Phukan; Prasenjit Manna; Wahengbam Romi; Pankaj Bharali; Dibyajyoti Ozah; Ravi Kumar Sahu; Prachurjya Dutta; Moirangthem Goutam Singh; Gayatri Gogoi; Yasmin Begam Tapadar; Elapavalooru VSSK Babu; Rajeev K Sukumaran; Aishwarya R Nair; Anoop Puthiyamadam; PrajeeshKooloth Valappil; Adrash Velayudhan Pillai Prasannakumari; Kalpana Chodankar; Samir Damare; Ved Varun Agrawal; Kumardeep Chaudhary; Anurag Agrawal; Shantanu Sengupta; Debasis Dash.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21267889

ABSTRACT

Data science has been an invaluable part of the COVID-19 pandemic response with multiple applications, ranging from tracking viral evolution to understanding the effectiveness of interventions. Asymptomatic breakthrough infections have been a major problem during the ongoing surge of Delta variant globally. Serological discrimination of vaccine response from infection has so far been limited to Spike protein vaccines used in the higher-income regions. Here, we show for the first time how statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches can discriminate SARS-CoV-2 infection from immune response to an inactivated whole virion vaccine (BBV152, Covaxin, India), thereby permitting real-world vaccine effectiveness assessments from cohort-based serosurveys in Asia and Africa where such vaccines are commonly used. Briefly, we accessed serial data on Anti-S and Anti-NC antibody concentration values, along with age, sex, number of doses, and number of days since the last vaccine dose for 1823 Covaxin recipients. An ensemble ML model, incorporating a consensus clustering approach alongside the support vector machine (SVM) model, was built on 1063 samples where reliable qualifying data existed, and then applied to the entire dataset. Of 1448 self-reported negative subjects, 724 were classified as infected. Since the vaccine contains wild-type virus and the antibodies induced will neutralize wild type much better than Delta variant, we determined the relative ability of a random subset of such samples to neutralize Delta versus wild type strain. In 100 of 156 samples, where ML prediction differed from self-reported uninfected status, Delta variant, was neutralized more effectively than the wild type, which cannot happen without infection. The fraction rose to 71.8% (28 of 39) in subjects predicted to be infected during the surge, which is concordant with the percentage of sequences classified as Delta (75.6%-80.2%) over the same period.

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21251805

ABSTRACT

Here we report for the first time the SARS-CoV-2 detection in autolysed samples from an exhumed decomposed body post-thirty six days after death. Both naso-oropharyngeal swabs and visceral samples from the lung, intestine, liver, and kidney were collected from the body exhumed post-fifteen days after burial, stored in viral transport medium and in saturated salt solution respectively. Naso-oropharyngeal swabs showed the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome as identified by the amplification of viral E, N, RdRP, or ORF1ab genes by RT-PCR. Subsequent examination of tissues reveal the detection of the virus genome in the intestine and liver, while no detection in the kidney and lung. These results signify the genome stability and implicate the virus survival in decomposed swab samples and in tissues and thereafter in storage solution. Further results also indicate spatial distribution of the virus in tissues during the early stage of infection in the subject with no respiratory distress. Considering the presence of cool, humid, and moist location of the exhumation, the presence of virus genome might also indicate that SARS-CoV-2 can persist for more than seven days on the surface of dead bodies similar to the Ebola virus, confirming that transmission from deceased subjects is possible for an extended period after death. These results further reaffirm the robustness of the RT-PCR aiding in the detection of viruses or their genome in decomposed samples when other methods of detection could not be useful.

3.
Salwa Naushin; Viren Sardana; Rajat Ujjainiya; Nitin Bhatheja; Rintu Kutum; Akash Kumar Bhaskar; Shalini Pradhan; Satyartha Prakash; Raju Khan; Birendra Singh Rawat; Giriraj Ratan Chandak; Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka; Mahesh Anumalla; Amit Lahiri; Susanta Kar; Shrikant Ramesh Mulay; Madhav Nilakanth Mugale; Mrigank Srivastava; Shaziya Khan; Anjali Srivastava; Bhawna Tomar; Murugan Veerapandian; Ganesh Venkatachalam; Selvamani Raja Vijayakumar; Ajay Agarwal; Dinesh Gupta; Prakash M Halami; Muthukumar Serva Peddha; Gopinath M; Ravindra P Veeranna; Anirban Pal; Vinay Kumar Agarwal; Anil Ku Maurya; Ranvijay Kumar Singh; Ashok Kumar Raman; Suresh Kumar Anandasadagopan; Parimala Karupannan; Subramanian Venkatesan; Harish Kumar Sardana; Anamika Kothari; Rishabh Jain; Anupma Thakur; Devendra Singh Parihar; Anas Saifi; Jasleen Kaur; Virendra Kumar; Avinash Mishra; Iranna Gogeri; Geetha Vani Rayasam; Praveen Singh; Rahul Chakraborty; Gaura Chaturvedi; Pinreddy Karunakar; Rohit Yadav; Sunanda Singhmar; Dayanidhi Singh; Sharmistha Sarkar; Purbasha Bhattacharya; Sundaram Acharya; Vandana Singh; Shweta Verma; Drishti Soni; Surabhi Seth; Firdaus Fatima; Shakshi Vashisht; Sarita Thakran; Akash Pratap Singh; Akanksha Sharma; Babita Sharma; Manikandan Subramanian; Yogendra Padwad; Vipin Hallan; Vikram Patial; Damanpreet Singh; Narendra Vijay Tirpude; Partha Chakrabarti; Sujay Krishna Maity; Dipyaman Ganguly; Jit Sarkar; Sistla Ramakrishna; Balthu Narender Kumar; Kiran A Kumar; Sumit G. Gandhi; Piyush Singh Jamwal; Rekha Chouhan; Vijay Lakshmi Jamwal; Nitika Kapoor; Debashish Ghosh; Ghanshyam Thakkar; Umakanta Subudhi; Pradip Sen; Saumya Raychaudhri; Amit Tuli; Pawan Gupta; Rashmi Kumar; Deepak Sharma; Rajesh P. Ringe; Amarnarayan D; Mahesh Kulkarni; Dhanasekaran Shanmugam; Mahesh Dharne; Syed G Dastager; Rakesh Joshi; Amita P. Patil; Sachin N Mahajan; Abu Junaid Khan; Vasudev Wagh; Rakeshkumar Yadav; Ajinkya Khilari; Mayuri Bhadange; Arvindkumar H. Chaurasiya; Shabda E Kulsange; Krishna khairnar; Shilpa Paranjape; Jatin Kalita; G.Narahari Sastry; Tridip Phukan; Prasenjit Manna; Wahengbam Romi; Pankaj Bharali; Dibyajyoti Ozah; Ravi Kumar Sahu; Elapaval VSSK Babu; Rajeev K Sukumaran; Aishwarya R Nair; Anoop Puthiyamadam; Prajeesh Kooloth Valappil; Adarsh Velayudhanpillai; Kalpana Chodankar; Samir Damare; Yennapu Madhavi; Ved Varun Agrawal; Sumit Dahiya; Anurag Agrawal; Debasis Dash; Shantanu Sengupta.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21249713

ABSTRACT

To understand the spread of SARS-CoV2, in August and September 2020, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (India), conducted a sero-survey across its constituent laboratories and centers across India. Of 10,427 volunteers, 1058 (10.14%) tested positive for SARS CoV2 anti-nucleocapsid (anti-NC) antibodies; 95% with surrogate neutralization activity. Three-fourth recalled no symptoms. Repeat serology tests at 3 (n=346) and 6 (n=35) months confirmed stability of antibody response and neutralization potential. Local sero-positivity was higher in densely populated cities and was inversely correlated with a 30 day change in regional test positivity rates (TPR). Regional seropositivity above 10% was associated with declining TPR. Personal factors associated with higher odds of sero-positivity were high-exposure work (Odds Ratio, 95% CI, p value; 2{middle dot}23, 1{middle dot}92-2{middle dot}59, 6{middle dot}5E-26), use of public transport (1{middle dot}79, 1{middle dot}43-2{middle dot}24, 2{middle dot}8E-06), not smoking (1{middle dot}52, 1{middle dot}16-1{middle dot}99, 0{middle dot}02), non-vegetarian diet (1{middle dot}67, 1{middle dot}41-1{middle dot}99, 3{middle dot}0E-08), and B blood group (1{middle dot}36,1{middle dot}15-1{middle dot}61, 0{middle dot}001). Impact StatementWidespread asymptomatic and undetected SARS-CoV2 infection affected more than a 100 million Indians by September 2020. Declining new cases thereafter may be due to persisting humoral immunity amongst sub-communities with high exposure. FundingCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (CSIR)

4.
Toxics ; 8(3)2020 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32899560

ABSTRACT

This report summarizes the outcome of a workshop held in Mysuru, India in January 2020 addressing the adverse health effects of exposure to biomass smoke (BMS). The aim of the workshop was to identify uncertainties and gaps in knowledge and possible methods to address them in the Mysuru study on Determinants of Health in Rural Adults (MUDHRA) cohort. Specific aims were to discuss the possibility to improve and introduce new screening methods for exposure and effect, logistic limitations and other potential obstacles, and plausible strategies to overcome these in future studies. Field visits were included in the workshop prior to discussing these issues. The workshop concluded that multi-disciplinary approaches to perform: (a) indoor and personalized exposure assessment; (b) clinical and epidemiological field studies among children, adolescents, and adults; (c) controlled exposure experiments using physiologically relevant in vitro and in vivo models to understand molecular patho-mechanisms are warranted to dissect BMS-induced adverse health effects. It was perceived that assessment of dietary exposure (like phytochemical index) may serve as an important indicator for understanding potential protective mechanisms. Well trained field teams and close collaboration with the participating hospital were identified as the key requirements to successfully carry out the study objectives.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...