Predictive value of a pathophysiological score in the surgical treatment of perforated diverticular disease.

Resection is the preferred method of perforated diverticular disease treatment compared to conservative treatment. However, the immediate or deferred timing of bowel continuity restoration for advanced degrees of peritoneal contamination is debatable. This is a retrospective study designed to identify operative mortality predictors and guidelines for safe primary anastomosis. A pathophysiological score (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, APACHE II) was applied to 135 consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for acute inflammatory complication of diverticular disease. A multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors such as age, chronic diseases, neoplastic cancer, Acute Physiology Score (APS), Hinchey's classification and APACHE II scores. Seventy patients underwent primary resection and anastomosis, 35 underwent Hartmann's procedure and 15 conservative treatment. There was a significant correlation between operative mortality and increasing disease severity based on Hinchey's classification, APS and APACHE II scores. The multivariate analysis proved APACHE II scores to be the only prognostic factor of operative mortality. Both single and multivariate analysis of variance failed to identify a factor significantly associated with surgical and/or medical postoperative complications. APACHE II scores were the best predictor for operative mortality in patients with diverticular disease complications, but none of the classification criteria used was effective in predicting postoperative complication. Patients with phlegmonous sigmoiditis can be safely treated with primary resection and anastomosis. Conservative treatment should not be considered an effective method for diverticular disease. A prospective trial comparing resection with and without colostomy should be done for local and diffuse purulent peritonitis treatment. Hartmann's procedure is seen to be the only indicator for faecal peritonitis.

[Open treatment in acute severe pancreatitis]. / Trattamento aperto nella pancreatite acuta severa.

Technical procedures normally used for open packing in our Institute (ICU) are described. Results of this procedure, utilized in thirteen patients suffering from infected pancreatic necrosis and multiple organ failure are reported. The grade of pancreatitis severity has been studied in detail. At admission patients presented a mean Ranson score of 6 and the morphological alteration sec. Balthazar was D in six patients and E in seven. At least two organs were insufficient at the beginning of our observation and the mean number of insufficient organs was 4. The mean APACHE II score was 20. Necrosis was documented in all patients. They were all admitted to ICU and the mean time of treatment was 50 days. Daily debridement was performed and continuous lavage was later added to daily open review. Three patients died, one from local bleeding and two from respiratory insufficiency. No patient died of sepsis and no mortality was observed in the last six cases. According to the severity of Ranson score, APACHE II, the number of insufficient organs and TAC morphological alteration predicted mortality rate should have been 70-80%; on the contrary, it was 25%. In conclusion open packing seems to be the correct treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis, particularly when it is complicated by multiple organ dysfunction.

The choice of surgical procedure for peritonitis due to colonic perforation.

OBJECTIVE: Because the choice of surgical procedure for colonic perforation is still matter of debate, we retrospectively studied peritonitis caused by spontaneous colonic perforation to assess predictors of mortality and the safety of primary resection and anastomosis. DESIGN: Case series. PATIENTS: We investigated one hundred thirty-six consecutive patients with peritonitis due to colonic perforation who were surgically treated in an emergency surgery department. Eighty-one patients underwent primary resection and anastomosis, thirty-three underwent the Hartmann procedure, and twenty-two had simple colostomy. The seriousness of peritonitis was assessed in terms of Hinchey stage, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 20%. The APACHE II scores and MPIs were lower for survivors than for nonsurvivors. The mortality rate was 6% for primary resection and anastomosis, 30% for the Hartmann procedure, and 59% for simple colostomy, but the severity scores were significantly lower in patients who underwent primary resection than those of patients who had the Hartmann procedure and colostomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Since primary resection and anastomosis has been shown to be safe, we suggest that is is proper, even in the presence of peritonitis. In spite of this, we conclude that the surgical procedure does not influence outcome but that the mortality rate is related to the severity of peritonitis, accurately measured by APACHE II score and MPI.