Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

PURPOSE: To review the epidemiology, mechanisms, complications, predictors, prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search of English-language reports published between 1966 and 2000 and a search of references of relevant papers. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical and basic research studies on atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant clinical information was extracted from selected articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Atrial fibrillation occurs in 10% to 65% of patients after cardiac surgery, usually on the second or third postoperative day. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and longer, more expensive hospital stays. Prophylactic use of beta-adrenergic blockers reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and should be administered before and after cardiac surgery to all patients without contraindication. Prophylactic amiodarone and atrial overdrive pacing should be considered in patients at high risk for postoperative atrial fibrillation (for example, patients with previous atrial fibrillation or mitral valve surgery). For patients who develop atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery, a strategy of rhythm management or rate management should be selected. For patients who are hemodynamically unstable or highly symptomatic or who have a contraindication to anticoagulation, rhythm management with electrical cardioversion, amiodarone, or both is preferred. Treatment of the remaining patients should focus on rate control because most will spontaneously revert to sinus rhythm within 6 weeks after discharge. All patients with atrial fibrillation persisting for more than 24 to 48 hours and without contraindication should receive anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation frequently complicates cardiac surgery. Many cases can be prevented with appropriate prophylactic therapy. A strategy of rhythm management for symptomatic patients and rate management for all other patients usually results in reversion to sinus rhythm within 6 weeks of discharge.

Effects of laparoscopic vs laparotomy treatment of E. coli peritonitis on hemodynamic responses in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is being used now for increasingly diverse clinical applications, including diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis and bacterial peritonitis. However, some concerns and controversies exist regarding the effectiveness of laparoscopic irrigation of the abdominal cavity compared with that achieved during laparotomy. Of no less importance is concern that establishing a CO(2) pneumoperitoneum in patients with cardiopulmonary insufficiency or endotoxemic shock may compromise hemodynamic function. The objective of this randomized, controlled study was to determine the effects of laparoscopic versus laparotomy intervention on hemodynamic and outcome measurements using a porcine model of Escherichia coli peritonitis. METHODS: For this study, 24 specific pathogen-free Hanford pigs underwent surgical placement of carotid, Swan-Ganz, and peritoneal catheters. After a 24-h recovery period, one subset of pigs (n = 12) received a bolus infusion of 9 x 10(8) CFU/kg E. coli intraperitoneally (septic) and intravenous fluid resuscitation. The remaining 12 pigs were not challenged with E. coli (control). Twenty-four hours later, all 24 pigs underwent either laparoscopic or open peritoneal irrigation with saline, then were reevaluated 48 h after surgical intervention. Standard cardiopulmonary, hematologic, and bacteriologic assessments were obtained both perioperatively and 48 h after surgical intervention. RESULTS: Pigs given E. coli exhibited significantly elevated heart rates and core temperatures and decreased O(2) saturation during the initial 6 h. Within 24 h, these pigs exhibited respiratory alkalosis, altered blood leukocyte profiles, and E. coli-infected peritoneal fluid. Random blood samples from the septic pigs tested negative for E. coli. Mean pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures were lower (p < 0.05) in septic than in control pigs before and after surgical intervention. Septic pigs that underwent laparoscopy had significantly lower (p < 0.05) arterial pH and higher arterial pCO(2) levels than septic pigs after laparotomy. Other cardiopulmonary responses were similar irrespective of the surgical modality used. One of six septic pigs from each surgical group still had E. coli growth in its peritoneal fluid 48 h after surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intervention demonstrated effectiveness equal to that of laparotomy for treating acute E. coli peritonitis in pigs without septic shock.