Shared Governance Through Bylaws: Transformation Within a College of Nursing.

BACKGROUND: Enhancing faculty voice and promoting shared governance within academia has long been called for but has not been well-reported. A college of nursing in the midwestern United States identified shortcomings in its organizational structure including lack of faculty voice, communication barriers, lack of faculty participation in decision making, and academic programs operating independently. METHOD: A workgroup was formed to transform the bylaws to promote shared governance, including faculty voice, equality, and engagement. RESULTS: The bylaws were revised and presented to faculty for discussion, further revisions, and vote. The revised bylaws were approved and implemented in August 2021. CONCLUSION: Through transformation of the bylaws, the college's 12-committee structure was reconceptualized to five standing committees and 13 subcommittees. Clear communication lines and cross-committee collaboration was established to break down the former academic program silos. Faculty with primary teaching assignments are equally represented throughout the structure with voice, vote, and responsibility. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(5):277-281.].

Nursing interventions in a telemonitoring program.

BACKGROUND: The use of telemonitoring of patients with chronic illness in their homes is growing. Current literature does not describe what types of patient problems are addressed by nurses in these programs and what actions are taken in response to identified problems. This study defined and analyzed patient problems and nursing actions delivered in a telemonitoring program focused on chronic disease management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were drawn from a clinical trial that evaluated telemonitoring in patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension. Using study patient records, patient problems and nursing actions were coded using an inductive approach. RESULTS: In total, 2,336 actions were coded for 68 and 65 participants in two intervention groups. The most frequent reasons for contact were reporting information to the primary care provider and lifestyle information related to diabetes and hypertension (e.g., diet, smoking cessation, foot care, and social contacts). The most frequent mode of contact was the study sending a letter to a participant. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed descriptions of interventions delivered facilitate analysis of the unique contributions of nurses in the expanding market of telemonitoring, enable identification of the appropriate number and combination of interventions needed to improve outcomes, and make possible more systematic translation of findings to practice. Furthermore, this information can inform calculation of appropriate panel sizes for care managers and the competencies needed to provide this care.

Outcomes of a home telehealth intervention for patients with diabetes and hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Home telehealth programs often focus on a single disease, yet many patients who need monitoring have multiple conditions. This study evaluated secondary outcomes from a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of home telehealth to improve outcomes of patients with co-morbid diabetes and hypertension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled clinical trial compared two remote monitoring intensity levels (low and high) and usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension being treated in primary care. Secondary outcomes assessed were knowledge (diabetes, hypertension, medications), self-efficacy, adherence (diabetes, medications), and patient perceptions of the intervention mode. RESULTS: Knowledge scores improved in the high-intensity intervention group participants, but upon further analysis, we found the intervention effect was not mediated by gain in knowledge. No significant differences were found across the groups in self-efficacy, adherence, or patient perceptions of the intervention mode. CONCLUSIONS: Home telehealth can enhance detection of key clinical symptoms that occur between regular physician visits. While our intervention improved glycemic and blood pressure control, the mechanism of the effect for this improvement was not clear.

Effectiveness of home telehealth in comorbid diabetes and hypertension: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Increased emphasis is being placed on the critical need to control hypertension (HTN) in patients with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a nurse-managed home telehealth intervention to improve outcomes in veterans with comorbid diabetes and HTN. DESIGN: A single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial design comparing two remote monitoring intensity levels and usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and HTN being treated in primary care was used. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were hemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure (SBP); secondary outcome was adherence. RESULTS: Intervention subjects experienced decreased A1c during the 6-month intervention period compared with the control group, but 6 months after the intervention was withdrawn, the intervention groups were comparable with the control group. For SBP, the high-intensity subjects had a significant decrease in SBP compared with the other groups at 6 months and this pattern was maintained at 12 months. Adherence improved over time for all groups, but there were no differences among the three groups. LIMITATIONS: Subjects had relatively good baseline control for A1c and SBP; minorities and women were underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: Home telehealth provides an innovative and pragmatic approach to enhance earlier detection of key clinical symptoms requiring intervention. Transmission of education and advice to the patient on an ongoing basis with close surveillance by nurses can improve clinical outcomes in patients with comorbid chronic illness.

Patient perceptions of a remote monitoring intervention for chronic disease management.

Use of telecommunications technology to provide remote monitoring for people with chronic disease is becoming increasingly accepted as a means to improve patient outcomes and reduce resource use. The purpose of this project was to evaluate patient perceptions of a nurse-managed remote monitoring intervention to improve outcomes in veterans with comorbid diabetes and hypertension. Postintervention evaluation data were collected using a 12-item questionnaire and an open-ended question. Participants rated the program as generally positive on the questionnaire, but responses to the open-ended question revealed criticisms and suggestions for improvement not captured on the questionnaire. Interviewing participants in these programs may offer richer data for identifying areas for program improvement.

Outcomes of a home telehealth intervention for patients with heart failure.

We evaluated the efficacy of two telehealth applications, delivered by telephone and videophone, for improving outcomes of patients following hospital discharge for an acute exacerbation of heart failure. The outcomes measured were patient self-efficacy, satisfaction with care and knowledge of and compliance with prescribed medications. At hospital discharge, patients were randomly assigned to either control (usual care), telephone or videophone groups. Study nurses contacted the intervention patients each week for 90 days after discharge. A total of 148 patients were enrolled: 49 were randomized to usual care, 52 to the videophone intervention and 47 to the telephone intervention. At 90 days, 126 patients (85%) had completed follow-up; at 180 days, 109 patients (74%) had completed follow-up. There were no significant differences between the groups in medication compliance, self-efficacy or satisfaction with care. The intervention group patients were more likely to have had their medications adjusted during the 90-day intervention period. Knowledge scores improved in the intervention group patients, although these scores were lower at enrolment compared to the control group. It is possible that routine monitoring of symptoms by the study nurses led to medication adjustments and accounted for the intervention patients' significantly delayed time to readmission relative to the control patients.

Evaluation of home telehealth following hospitalization for heart failure: a randomized trial.

Previous studies have found that home-based intervention programs reduce readmission rates for patients with heart failure. Only one previous trial has compared telephone and videophone to traditional care to deliver a home-based heart failure intervention program. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a telehealth-facilitated postdischarge support program in reducing resource use in patients with heart failure. Patients at a Midwestern Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center were randomized to telephone, videophone, or usual care for follow-up care after hospitalization for heart failure exacerbation. Outcome measures included readmission rates; time to first readmission; urgent care clinic visits; survival; and quality of life. The intervention resulted in a significantly longer time to readmission but had no effect on readmission rates or mortality. There were no differences in hospital days or urgent care clinic use. All subjects reported higher disease-specific quality of life scores at 1 year. There was evidence of the value of telephone follow-up, but there was no evidence to support the benefit of videophone care over telephone care. Rigorous evaluation is needed to determine which patients may benefit most from specific telehealth applications and which technologies are most cost-effective.

Nurse and patient communication profiles in a home-based telehealth intervention for heart failure management.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared differences in nurse and patient communication profiles between two telehealth modes: telephone and videophone, and evaluated longitudinal changes in communication, nurse perceptions, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Subjects were enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating a 90-day home-based intervention for heart failure. Telephone (n=14) and videophone (n=14) interactions were audio taped and analyzed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. RESULTS: Nurses were more likely to use open-ended questions, back-channel responses, friendly jokes, and checks for understanding on the telephone compared to videophone. Compliments given and partnership were more common on the videophone. Patients were more likely to give lifestyle information and approval comments on the telephone, and used more closed-ended questions on the videophone. Nurses perceptions of the interactions were not different between the telephone and videophone, nor did their perceptions change significantly over the course of the intervention. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction between the telephone and videophone. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study did not support use of a videophone over the telephone. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is critical to match technologies to patient needs and use the least complex technology possible. When considering use a videophone, health care providers should critically examine the trade-offs between additional complexities with the added value of the visual interaction.

Nurse and patient communication via low- and high-bandwidth home telecare systems.

We examined nurse-patient communication on two videoconferencing systems: a video-phone (PSTN video) and a PC-based system (IP video). The former used data transmission via a modem at 33.6 kbit/s and the latter via a local-area network at up to 512 kbit/s. Twenty-six nurses and 18 volunteers (simulated patients) participated. On each video system nurse-patient dyads completed scripted interactions; they then completed questionnaires to assess communication. Of the participants, 84% (n=37) preferred IP video and 14% (n=6) preferred PSTN video (one expressed no preference). IP video was rated significantly higher in all communication quality areas except self-consciousness/embarrassment. Although participants' overall ratings were higher for the IP video system, two important advantages of the PSTN video system were identified by both nurses and patients: first, it provided superior visualization of the medication bottle, insulin syringe and the patient's skin; and second, it was easier to use. Video quality and audio quality are important determinants of patient and provider perceptions, but ease of use, clinical appropriateness, and the need for training and support must not be forgotten.