A restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy to prevent myocardial injury in patients undergoing surgery for fractured neck of femur: a feasibility randomised trial (RESULT-NOF).

BACKGROUND: The optimum transfusion strategy in patients with fractured neck of femur is uncertain, particularly if there is coexisting cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-centre, randomised feasibility trial of two transfusion strategies. We randomly assigned patients undergoing surgery for fractured neck of femur to a restrictive (haemoglobin, 70-90 g L-1) or liberal (haemoglobin, 90-110 g L-1) transfusion strategy throughout their hospitalisation. Feasibility outcomes included: enrolment rate, protocol compliance, difference in haemoglobin, and blood exposure. The primary clinical outcome was myocardial injury using troponin estimations. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events, postoperative complications, duration of hospitalisation, mortality, and quality of life. RESULTS: We enrolled 200 (22%) of 907 eligible patients, and 62 (31%) showed decreased haemoglobin (to 90 g L-1 or less) and were thus exposed to the intervention. The overall protocol compliance was 81% in the liberal group and 64% in the restrictive group. Haemoglobin concentrations were similar preoperatively and at postoperative day 1 but lower in the restrictive group on day 2 (mean difference [MD], 7.0 g L-1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-12.4). Lowest haemoglobin within 30 days/before discharge was lower in the restrictive group (MD, 5.3 g L-1; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0). Overall, 58% of patients in the restrictive group received no transfusion compared with 4% in the liberal group (difference in proportion, 54.5%; 95% CI, 36.8-72.2). The proportion with the primary clinical outcome was 14/26 (54%, liberal) vs 24/34 (71%, restrictive), and the difference in proportion was -16.7% (95% CI, -41.3 to 7.8; P=0.18). CONCLUSION: A clinical trial of two transfusion strategies in hip fracture with a clinically relevant cardiac outcome is feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03407573.

Adolescent tracheal intubation in an adult urban emergency department: a retrospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Tracheal intubation is the cornerstone of advanced emergency airway management in children and adults and there is good-quality data characterizing intubation in both groups. There are, however, few published studies on emergency tracheal intubation in adolescents. We carried out an observational study to characterize tracheal intubation in adolescents. METHODS: We analysed data from a previously collected Emergency Department Intubation Registry. We included all attempts at tracheal intubation performed in our adult emergency department between 1999 and 2011. We recorded the indication for intubation, the staff involved, the technique and drugs used, and the rates of successful intubation and adverse events. We classified patients into three age groups: 13-16 years (adolescent), 17-24 years (young adult) and at least 25 years (older adult). RESULTS: Trauma was the most common indication for intubation in adolescents, and rapid sequence induction was used in 88% of cases. Ninety-nine percent of tracheal intubations in adolescent patients were successful on the first or the second attempt, no adolescent underwent more than three attempts and none required a surgical airway. The initial intubation attempt in adolescents was more likely to be performed by an anaesthetist (P<0.005). The first attempt success rate was higher (P<0.01) and adverse event rate was lower (P<0.05) in adolescents than in adults. Hypotension was the only adverse event recorded in adolescents; this occurred in three patients (4.5%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the airway in adolescent patients can be managed successfully and safely in an adult emergency department where there is close collaboration between anaesthetists and emergency physicians.

Tracheal intubation in an urban emergency department in Scotland: a prospective, observational study of 3738 intubations.

AIM: The emergency department (ED) is an area where major airway difficulties can occur, often as complications of rapid sequence induction (RSI). We undertook a prospective, observational study of tracheal intubation performed in a large, urban UK ED to study this further. METHODS: We reviewed data on every intubation attempt made in our ED between January 1999 and December 2011. We recorded techniques and drugs used, intubator details, success rate, and associated complications. Tracheal intubation in our ED is managed jointly by emergency physicians and anaesthetists; an anaesthetist is contacted to attend to support ED staff when RSI is being performed. RESULTS: We included 3738 intubations in analysis. 2749 (74%) were RSIs, 361 (10%) were other drug combinations, and 628 (17%) received no drugs. Emergency physicians performed 78% and anaesthetists 22% of intubations. Tracheal intubation was successful in 3724 patients (99.6%). First time success rate was 85%; 98% of patients were successfully intubated with two or fewer attempts, and three patients (0.1%) had more than three attempts. Intubation failed in 14 patients; five (0.13%) had a surgical airway performed. Associated complications occurred in 286 (8%) patients. The incidence of complications was associated with the number of attempts made; 7% in one attempt, 15% in two attempts, and 32% in three attempts (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A collaborative approach between emergency physicians and anaesthetists contributed to a high rate of successful intubation and a low rate of complications. Close collaboration in training and delivery of service models is essential to maintain these high standards and achieve further improvement where possible.

Patients with hip fracture admitted to critical care: epidemiology, interventions and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Although there is much current debate about the use of critical care to enhance peri-operative care of patients with hip fracture there are limited supporting data. We investigated the epidemiology, critical care interventions and outcomes of patients with hip fracture admitted to a large UK critical care unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all patients with hip fracture (excluding those with multiple trauma, and those with femoral shaft or peri-prosthetic fracture) who were admitted to our critical care unit during a four year period. We recorded patient characteristics, reason for admission to critical care, interventions and organ support performed, and patient outcome. RESULTS: We identified 99 patients with a mean age of 81 years; this represented 1% of patients admitted to critical care, and 2.4% of patients with hip fracture admitted to hospital during the study period. Fifty-two patients required no organ support; 19 received only respiratory support, 13 only cardiovascular support, 12 received both respiratory and cardiovascular support, and 3 received respiratory, cardiovascular and renal support. Outcome worsened as the level of organ support increased (p=0.01). Fifteen patients died in critical care, acute hospital mortality was 33% and 1-year mortality was 54%. No patient for whom admission was planned before surgery died in critical care and the 30-day mortality for this group was 13%. Outcome was related to the time between surgery and critical care admission: patients admitted before surgery or longer than 2 days after surgery had worse outcomes (p=0.001). The reason for admission to critical care also influenced outcome: patients with sepsis had poor outcome with one-third dying in critical care and a further one-third not surviving to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The major determinants of outcome in this population were reason for admission, and timing of admission to critical care. One year survival was better than that for unselected patients aged >80 years admitted to critical care. Admission to critical care and use of enhanced peri-operative care for selected hip fracture patients is entirely appropriate and beneficial.

Organ donation after circulatory death: an update.

There is an ongoing shortfall of organs for donation in the UK and worldwide. Strategies including donation after circulatory death (DCD), living donation and better identification of potential donors are attempting to increase the number of donors and donated organs. The number of DCD donors in the UK increased by 808% from 37 to 336 between 2001 and 2010 and this is continuing to increase. The most common organs donated from DCD donors are the kidneys, but there is increasing experience of liver, lung and pancreas transplantation. The process of DCD varies between different countries and institutions. The outcome of DCD transplantation has been largely encouraging, particularly for kidneys. The increase in DCD has led to an appraisal of issues that may arise during the donation process; these include the Lazarus phenomenon, the dead donor rule, perimortem interventions, public opinion and conflict of interest for clinicians.

An integrated model for developing research skills in an undergraduate medical curriculum: appraisal of an approach using student selected components.

Student selected components (SSCs), at that time termed special study modules, were arguably the most innovative element in Tomorrow's Doctors (1993), the document from the General Medical Council that initiated the modernization of medical curricula in the UK. SSCs were proposed to make up one-third of the medical curriculum and provide students with choice, whilst allowing individual schools autonomy in how SSCs were utilized. In response, at the University of Edinburgh the undergraduate medical curriculum provides an integrated and sequential development and assessment of research skill learning outcomes, for all students in the SSC programme. The curriculum contains SSCs which provide choice to students in all 5 years. There are four substantial timetabled SSCs where students develop research skills in a topic and speciality of their choice. These SSCs are fully integrated and mapped with core learning outcomes and assessment, particularly with the 'Evidence-Based Medicine and Research' programme theme. These research skills are developed incrementally and applied fully in a research project in the fourth year. One-third of students also perform an optional intercalated one-year honours programme between years 2 and 3, usually across a wide range of honours schools at the biomedical science interface. Student feedback is insightful and demonstrates perceived attainment of research competencies. The establishment of these competencies is discussed in the context of enabling junior graduate doctors to be effective and confident at utilizing their research skills to effectively practice evidence-based medicine. This includes examining their own practice through clinical audit, developing an insight into the complexity of the evidence base and uncertainty, and also gaining a view into a career as a clinical academic.

Etomidate for critically ill patients. Pro: yes we can use it.

Etomidate is used to induce anaesthesia in critically ill patients in many environments, including pre-hospital care, in the emergency and critical care departments and in the operating theatre. It has a favourable cardiovascular profile, but its use has courted controversy because it suppresses adrenal function which some believe is associated with worse outcome, particularly in patients with sepsis. Because there is much evidence of harm associated with hypotension in critically ill patients, it is important to use an anaesthetic induction drug which is less likely to cause hypotension. Etomidate undoubtedly causes adrenal suppression, but the clinical consequences of this remain unclear. There is no convincing or consistent evidence that etomidate is associated with harm, particularly if adjustment is made for pre-existing severity of illness. The etomidate debate is currently in clinical equipoise in which there is genuine uncertainty within the expert medical community. We review briefly the arguments in favour of continuing to use etomidate in critically ill patients.

Rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in elderly patients in the emergency department.

AIM: Our primary objective was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of elderly (≥ 80 years) patients undergoing rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia and intubation (RSI) in our emergency department (ED). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data collected prospectively between January 1999 and December 2007. We retrieved age; gender; presenting diagnosis; indication and urgency for RSI; complications related to RSI; hospital destination; and outcome. RESULTS: 1686 patients underwent RSI in the ED during the study period; 107 (6%) were aged ≥ 80 years. The mean age (range) was 84 (80-91) years. 94 patients (88%) were living in a private residence before presentation to the ED. Intracerebral haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke and head injury were the commonest presenting diagnoses. Forty-one patients were admitted to intensive care, 55 were admitted to a ward (31 for palliative care) and 11 died in the ED. Seventy-two patients (67%) died; of the 35 survivors, 21 (60%) made a good recovery with no requirement for increased social care. Outcome was worse after neurological diagnoses, sepsis and trauma than after cardiac or respiratory failure, seizures or drug overdose. Presenting diagnosis predicted outcome on univariable analysis (p<0.001), but it was not possible to calculate risk for individual diagnoses. RSI-related complications, of which hypotension was commonest, occurred in 15% of patients. CONCLUSION: A small number of patients who undergo RSI in our ED are aged ≥ 80 years. They generally have high mortality with only 20% surviving to hospital discharge with no increase in dependency; however 60% of survivors make a good recovery. In this highly selected elderly population age is not the main determinant of outcome which is influenced more by presenting diagnosis.

Controlled organ donation after cardiac death: potential donors in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND.: The continuing shortfall of organs for transplantation has increased the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD). We hypothesized that some patients who undergo tracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED) and who are assessed for, but not admitted to, critical care might have potential for controlled DCD. METHODS.: We identified all patients who underwent tracheal intubation in the ED between 2004 and 2008 and studied their records to identify those not admitted to an intensive care unit. We reviewed the notes of patients extubated in the ED to ascertain the diagnosis, management, outcome, and potential exclusion criteria for controlled DCD. RESULTS.: One thousand three hundred seventy-four patients had tracheal intubation performed in the ED; 1053 received anesthetic drugs to assist intubation. Three hundred seventy-five patients were not admitted to intensive care unit; 235 died during resuscitation in the ED. Of the 49 patients extubated in the ED to allow terminal care, 26 were older than 70 years and 18 had comorbidities precluding organ donation. Fourteen patients could have been considered for DCD, but in eight, the time from extubation to death exceeded 2 hr. Thus, six patients might have been missed as potential controlled DCD from the ED in this 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS.: Identification of potential donors after cardiac death in the ED with appropriate use of critical care for selected patients may contribute to reducing the shortfall of organs for transplantation, although numbers are likely to be small. This area remains controversial and requires further informed discussion between emergency and critical care doctors and transplant teams.

Induction drug and outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit after emergency laparotomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Etomidate is often used to induce anaesthesia in sick patients owing to its relative cardiovascular stability. However, etomidate affects adrenal cortical activity, and there is concern that this could impair outcome in patients undergoing emergency surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 176 patients admitted to an ICU after emergency laparotomy. We retrieved ASA status, surgical diagnosis, induction drug use, blood pressure before and after induction and any vasopressor administration, steroid and vasopressor therapy in ICU and patient outcome. Choice of induction drug was at the discretion of the attending anaesthetist. RESULTS: The drugs (numbers of patients) used to induce anaesthesia were etomidate (52), thiopental (90), propofol (16), midazolam (12) and ketamine (4). Fifty-two patients (30%) died in hospital. ASA status was the only independent predictor of hospital outcome (P < 0.001). Choice of induction drug was related to ASA status. As ASA status worsened, the likelihood of using etomidate or midazolam/ketamine increased (P = 0.001). We found no association between etomidate and dying in hospital, though our study might not have had sufficient power to show a difference between induction drugs. The relative risks [95% confidence interval (CI)] of dying in hospital were etomidate 1.16 (0.72-1.87), thiopental 0.82 (0.52-1.30), propofol 0.40 (0.11-1.49) and midazolam/ketamine 1.84 (1.09-3.12). Vasopressor and steroid therapy in the ICU was not related to induction drug. The risk of developing hypotension at induction or of receiving vasopressor to treat hypotension was least with etomidate. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that etomidate is associated with worse outcome than thiopental or propofol in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, but we cannot be certain that etomidate is well tolerated in this group of patients. More data are required to address this issue definitively.

Endocrine measurements in survivors and non-survivors from critical illness.

OBJECTIVE: To compare measurements of thyroid and adrenal function between survivors and non-survivors in critical illness. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational study at the medical/surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland. PATIENTS: 163 patients admitted to the intensive care unit over a 4-month period. INTERVENTIONS: We took blood samples within 1 h of ICU admission, and at 08:00 hours on the subsequent 2 days of ICU admission. We measured serum total (TT(4)) and free (fT(4)) thyroxine, total (TT(3)) and free (fT(3)) tri-iodothyronine, thyrotropin (TSH) and plasma cortisol concentrations. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: TT(3) and TT(4) concentrations were significantly less in non-survivors than in survivors on admission and on day 1 but not on day 2. Cortisol concentrations were higher in non-survivors on admission and on day 1 but not on day 2. TSH, fT(3) and fT(4) concentrations did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors at any time. Only TT(4) and cortisol were independent predictors of outcome. Prediction of outcome from the admission sample values was not better than using APACHE II scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid hormone and cortisol concentrations differ between survivors and non-survivors on admission to intensive care, but the values overlap. These differences do not allow accurate prediction of outcome from critical illness.